similar to: Join Windows 2008 R2 SP1

Hello! Bind this as Wiki Samba, this only occurred attempting to add the Windows server when I adicioneo i second samba the problem did not occur. Em 23-06-2016 16:30, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 22/06/16 04:45, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Hello! >> Own two DC Samba 4 version 4.3.3, I'm trying to add a Windows Server >> 2008 SP1, however it is in replication screen

Hello! Any idea ? Thanks Em 24-06-2016 13:30, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: > > More info: > > 192.168.200.66 = Windows Server > > > samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone testelocal.interno > Jun 24 13:27:07 sambadc-01 named[1218]: client 192.168.200.66#61551: > updating zone 'testelocal.interno/NONE': update unsuccessful: > testelocal.interno:

On 14/06/16 17:00, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Correcting previous email > > > Hello! > Own two Dcs Samba 4.4, this all OK, but ids are different: > > > Example DC1: > id tr005 > uid = 3000039 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005) gid = 100 (users) groups = 100 > (users), 3000039 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005), 3,000,009 (BUILTIN \ users) > > Example DC2: > id tr005 > uid =

Hello! Own two Dcs Samba 4.4, this all OK, but ids are different: Example DC2: id tr005 uid = 3000039 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005) gid = 100 (users) groups = 100 (users), 3000039 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005), 3,000,009 (BUILTIN \ users) Example DC2: id tr005 uid = 3000023 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005) gid = 100 (users) groups = 100 (users), 3000023 (TESTELOCAL \ tr005), 3,000,001 (BUILTIN \ users) My smb.conf is the

That's one things to add schema in your AD, that's another thing to use that schema. Adding schema for rfc2307 in AD grant you possibility to set uidNumber, gidNumber, loginShell and others attributes to your AD users. That grant you that possibility but you are free to use that possibility. Next step is to define xidNumber to your users. 2016-06-14 18:31 GMT+02:00 Carlos A. P. Cunha

Understood, I leave dess form, or may have problems As for examples, with fileserver (separately)? But I already was using the RFC2307, because in both I am with the option: idmap_ldb: use RFC2307 = yes ??? Thank you Em 14-06-2016 13:13, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 14/06/16 17:00, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Correcting previous email >> >> >> Hello! >> Own two

Hi guys, I'm facing a problems with samba4 + bind9_dlz that consuming my time for several days. Everything is working fine until samba4 need to update dns when I'm work with more than one DC server. When samba (or bind) need to reload all zones, the module bind9_dlz is shutting down and then all my environment stops and I need to restart the bind to up again. See my log: ... Jan

Hi Maxence, > Fyi, i've updated to 4.7.1, the dbcheck still not fix the broken links, > is the fix you talk about planned for a future release ? > > Our customer reported me, some users have issues when their logon server > is DC1 but not when it's DC2. > > On DC1 some users have access to all shares, some doesn't have any > access at all. actually this last

Mathias, Thanks for your reply. Please, try to start your bind with some debug level and run commando "rndc reload" and see the end of the log. I saw samba source code and found the destroy dns function in dlz_bind9.c and called by turture blz_bind9.c. When dlz_bind9.c is shutting down, I get this error when I try to update dns. update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2

Using your log parameters, the shutting down message is not showed, but when I reload rndc a get the same effect. Everything is working fine until bond9_dlz needs to reload (and no restart) rndc. When this happens, I need to restart bind and everything works fine again. I'm starting named with named -d 3 -u named and using /var/log/messages. See log using your parameters: # rndc reload

Hai,   I've checked out the log you send and i re-read the complete thread.   Based on thats done and what i did see in you logs now, looks like a  * (wildcard)  entry is giving the problem. But i am not sure of that, the wildcard bugs should be fixed, when i look in bugzilla.  (#10435 #12952 )   I've forwarded the mail to Rowland also before we go throw things at you again. ;-)

-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:32:31 -0800 > Von: Matthieu Patou <mat at samba.org> > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] samba4 binddlz performance > On 11/19/2012 07:11 AM, Thomas Manninger wrote: > > Hello, > > > > i am using samba4rc2. > > > > I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get

Hello Marc I changed the rights back to 600 and root:root to sam.ldb and i think the rights of sam.ldb.d directory are correct. -rw------- 1 root root 16M Apr 2 17:29 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw------- 1 root root 10M Apr 2 17:29 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw-rw---- 2 root bind 26M Apr 2 17:28 DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb

HI As the reported problem occurred, it follows logs of the join attempt in DC with version 4.8.3. ====== samba-tool domain join INTERNO.XXXXXX.COM.BR DC -UAdministrator at INTERNO.XXXXXX.COM.BR --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --option ='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes' Finding a writeable DC for domain 'INTERNO.XXXXXX.COM.BR' Found DC dc-samba-a2.interno.XXXXXX.com.br Password for

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:39:50 +0100 (CET) Maxence SARTIAUX via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > To follow-up this issue, since the upgrade, when i do a named reload > it crash, look like there's duplicated zones. > > Here's the log when i trigger a reload > > > nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: received control >

Hello, I am getting these errors in /var/log/messages : Oct 12 16:36:15 sambadc samba[7147]: [2013/10/12 16:36:15.817541, 0] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_periodic.c:664(kccsrv_samba_kcc) Oct 12 16:36:15 sambadc samba[7147]: Calling samba_kcc script Oct 12 16:36:15 sambadc abrt: detected unhandled Python exception in '/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_kcc' Oct 12 16:36:15 sambadc

On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:02:35 +0200 Karl Heinz Wichmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hallo Marc > > I change the loglevel to 10 > > > database > "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so -d 10"; > > and i get following errors: > > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: > No

Hai.. ? Just tested an upgrade of 4.1.17 to 4.2.1? result... Fail.. ? setup, Debian wheezy, sernet samba packages. 2 clean installed DC's? and 1 windows 7 pc joined. resolv.conf setup? DC1 : namserver DC2 then DC1. DC2:? namserver DC1 then DC2. ? stopped samba on both servers. upgraded the packages on both servers. ? started samba on DC1 ( the one with fsmo roles ) waited 5 min.

Hi samba team ! I'm face with a new problem on a new Samba PDC install (Debian 9). I don't know why, but systemd run multiples "rndc reconfig" commands during the init script. So the bind9 log file show : -> A successful start -> A failed reconfig (samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone) at each boot/reboot. So I need to restart bind9 each time manually. I created a wrapper

The Samba ports are not filtered. The firewall is between STG-DC and SAMBADC (both of them sync correctly). The sync problems happen in VIG-DC3, which is behind the same firewall of STG-DC. Here's nmap output (SAMBADC is 172.16.50.9): root at vig-dc3:~# nmap -Pn 172.16.50.9 Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2024-05-23 08:22 UTC Nmap scan report for SAMBADC.ugt.ldap (172.16.50.9)