Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "SRV-records not replicated with BIND9_DLZ"
2016 Jun 24
0
SRV-records not replicated with BIND9_DLZ
On 24/06/16 12:23, Stefan Kania wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I just set up a Domain with two DCs. I use Debian jessie the
> debian-pakages. And bind9 also from the debian repositories.
>
> After setting up the first DC everything was working fine. The
> nameresolution of hosts ans SRV-records worked.
>
> Then I set up a
2018 Oct 15
1
bind9 and samba 4.9.1
Hello,
I have the following problem with my bind9 together with samba 4.9
SerNet. If I start the bind9 I got the following error-message:
---------------
Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen
Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: started for DN
DC=zfd,DC=forumzfd,DC=de
Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: starting configure
Oct 15
2016 Jun 13
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
Rowland:
I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
A few years ago around 2.
We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later.
The problem is that at that time by not having infrastructure had to be
used as fileserver and this was a problem because all directories are UID
of 3000000 onwards.
2020 Mar 05
2
Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS still say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"
Hi, I'm doing some tests of samba DC 4.12.0 + MIT (experimental)
Kerberos + Bind DNS + Dhcpd + Chronyd on Fedora 32 beta.
All work fine except this issue:
The dhcp work, and the script for record the name of clients into dns
is disable (like Rowland suggest).
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2020-February/134875.html
If I join a new windows client to domain all work fine and
2016 Jun 13
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
On 13/06/16 20:14, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 13/06/16 19:37, Juan Ignacio wrote:
>> Rowland:
>>
>> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
>>
>> A few years ago around 2.
>>
>> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
>> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later.
>>
2016 Jun 14
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
On 14/06/16 15:36, Juan Ignacio wrote:
> I go to answer all, here I go.
>
> Have you given your users a uidNumber attribute ?
>
> Not all, but im set it in my user and not work.
>
> Have you given 'Domain Users' (at least) a gidNumber attribute ?
>
> Not all, but im set it in my user and not work.
>
> If you have done the above, have you run 'net cache
2016 Jun 14
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
On 14/06/16 16:16, Juan Ignacio wrote:
> Sorry, this is the Domain Member smb.con
> Im using Debian last version.
> Samba compiled from the sources.
>
> [global]
> netbios name = XXXXX
> security = ADS
> workgroup = XXXXXX
> realm = XXXXXXX
>
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> log level = 1
>
> # idmap
2015 Jan 19
3
strange: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
Hai,
?
Im seeing something very strange.? ( Debian wheezy, sernet-samba 4.1.14 )
?
after update-ing my debian servers and restarting them, im see-ing the following on my ADDC2.
?
[2015/01/19 11:09:10.422641,? 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done)
? ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
?
I?checked the SOA's of the DNS and
2015 Oct 07
1
Working configuration for Apache 2.4 auth vs Samba 4 AD
Hello,
had some problem to authenticate users with AD with my Apache 2.4 website
following the wiki page:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Apache_against_Active_Directory#Basic_LDAP_authentication
Here is my working configuration (thanks to
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/mod_authnz_ldap.html)
First you need authnz_ldap module for Apache.
<Location />
AuthName
2019 Dec 18
3
DNS replication issue
Hi Rowland,
Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a
possible tip:
_kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com.
output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV
_kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the list.
Kind regards.
Collected config? --- 2019-12-18-20:30 -----------
Hostname: addc-new
DNS Domain:
2019 Jul 09
3
Adding new DC causes samba.join.DCJoinException
Hi,
I have a primary DC that I provisioned with this command:
samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --realm={{ samba_default_realm }} --domain={{ samba_default_realm_domain }} --adminpass={{ samba_ldap_adminpw }}
I am now trying to provision a second DC in the same domain with the command:
samba-tool domain join {{ samba_default_realm |
2019 Aug 29
2
Permission Issue
Hi,
sorry to bother you:
I have three AD in the domain.
They all deliver different IDs:
root at addc2:~# id testuser
uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users)
Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users)
root at addc3:~$ id testuser
uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users)
2016 Jun 13
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
On 13/06/16 19:37, Juan Ignacio wrote:
> Rowland:
>
> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
>
> A few years ago around 2.
>
> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later.
>
> The problem is that at that time by not having infrastructure had to
> be used
2016 Jun 14
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
I go to answer all, here I go.
Have you given your users a uidNumber attribute ?
Not all, but im set it in my user and not work.
Have you given 'Domain Users' (at least) a gidNumber attribute ?
Not all, but im set it in my user and not work.
If you have done the above, have you run 'net cache flush' on the DC ?
Yes :-(
Is PAM set up correctly on the DC and domain member ?
2020 Mar 05
1
Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS still say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"
Il giorno gio, 05/03/2020 alle 15.07 +0000, Rowland penny via samba ha
scritto:
> I think I said use either the dhcp script or allow your clients to
> update their own records. The problem is, if you previously used the
> DHCP script, the clients records no longer belong to the clients, so
> they will not be able to update them. Try deleting the records and
> allow
> the
2016 Jun 14
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
Sorry, this is the Domain Member smb.con
Im using Debian last version.
Samba compiled from the sources.
[global]
netbios name = XXXXX
security = ADS
workgroup = XXXXXX
realm = XXXXXXX
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
log level = 1
# idmap config used for your domain.
# Click on the following links for more information
# on the
2016 Jun 14
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
Rowland, a question.
"is to copy idmap.ldap from the first DC to all others and then keep them
in sync, the other is to use RFC2307 attributes."
I can do the same with my member server? Maybe it works, or not for beign a
member server.
Maybe i can change my Member Server to a Domain Controller and after use
idmap, sync.
Its ok?
Analista Inf.
Juan Ignacio Pazos
2019 Feb 22
2
lookup_name_smbconf for <user> failed
Hi
I have a Red Hat 7.6 server with samba-4.8.3 which report
lookup_name_smbconf failed when running "smbclient -L" from another console
on the same server. smbclient works fine on an old server running Suse and
samba version 3 and thew the
user.
Any ideas of where to look or what to try?
I got this in the logfile:
# grep "^ " /var/log/samba/log.172.23.10.25
init_oplocks:
2014 Jun 02
1
Fresh ADC: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
I hopefully cleared all SAMBA files and set up a fresh ADC using:
samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --domain=UAC --realm=UAC.MGR
--server-role=dc --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --targetdir=/srv/files
--adminpass="secret" --option="dns forwarder=172.16.6.11"
The provisioning seemed okay, i.e. nothing hints at any errors and I see
a DOMAIN SID as the final entry as
2019 Dec 18
0
DNS replication issue
On 18/12/2019 14:07, Ilias Chasapakis forumZFD via samba wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a
> possible tip:
>
> _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com.
>
> output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV
> _kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the