similar to: smbpasswd stops working post-upgrade

"cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and the server doesn't support it" Should mean that your Samba is too old for your clients. See badlocks bug to better view of your issue. See man smb.conf looking for "sign" into it. I believe - but I'm not sure - that the option you are looking for are: client ldap sasl wrapping = sign client use spnego = yes

Hello, I have been playing with the XCP for a while now, and must say I''m very exited about the technology. I had no prior experience with Xen so it has taken me a while to understand the concepts, but now I feel most important issues are solved and I''ve purchased some hardware to build my (tiny) cloud on. The box is a Supermicro 1026TT-IBXF, so I have 2 x Ethernet and 1 x

Hey I have just installed Samba 3.2.7 on my Debian 4.0 with compile. But I'm trying to to join my Windows AD, and samba returns Using short domain name -- UNDERVISNING Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'UNDERVISNING.LOCAL' return code = 0 First I got return code = -1 I just assumed that this was bad, so I powered on, but now I get return code = 0 but I still can't get any user

Hi! I have a problem with my new Xen setup. I have installed Debian etch with netinstall and I''m using 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel in my dom0 and 3.0.3-0-4 version xen hypervisor. I''m using four network cards on my system and using three of them as xen bridges and dom0 is using the fourth one only for it''s own. So basicly both of my virtual servers use a network card

Hi have what might be some elementary questions. Really, what I"d love would be for someone who has had good success to publish his/her configuration files and, maybe, the output from ifconfig. At this point, when I see the not-so-good performance I"m getting, I don't realistically know if I'm in the right ballfield. It seems to me, that with so many mellanox cards out

Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0

Hello Tom! After i read and analyze some docs about IFB i decide that for implement this feature in Shorewall not need more efforts (of course i may be wrong). If we have 'ifb0' device then we must activate ingress discipline on real device (f.e. eth2) and redirect 'egress' from it to 'ifb0'. tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip

Hi there, I manage a Samba installation which has been operating very well on Debian Wheezy for a number of years. Up until last week I was running 3.6.25, which (as always until now) I compiled myself. Because of the large number of changes in the recent security patches, I opted to try the Debian 'samba' and 'winbind' packages. I was a little horrified to find that Debian is

Hi all, I''m having a hell of a time getting my IFB to work. I know I''ve done this before, so I''m missing something stupid. Can anybody tell me what it might be? Configs as follows: -------- #!/bin/sh modprobe ifb numifbs=1000 modprobe act_mirred modprobe 8021q brctl addbr br0 brctl setfd br0 0 brctl stp br0 off brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl addif br0 eth2 ifconfig eth1

Hi all, I''m getting my feet wet in the infiniband lake and of course I run into some problems. It would seem I got the compilation part of sles11 kernel 2.6.27 + Lustre 1.8.3 + ofed 1.4.2 right, because it allows me to see and use the infiniband fabric, and because ko2iblnd loads without any complaints. In /etc/modprobe.d/lustre (this is a Debian system, hence this subdir of

Hi All I am fighting this for 3 days and could not find any reason it is not working the way I want to (or I the way think it should). Internet output interface = eth2 (htb qdisc) Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc) main class = imq0 1:1 sub1 = 1:ffff (default) sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp) sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )

Hi! I so far succeeded in setting up a Samba NT4 DC with OpenLDAP backend. Unfortunately I get the following error message connecting a Windows XP client to the domain (translated from german): [...] The error was: "DNS name does not exist." (error code 0x0000232B RCODE_NAME_ERROR) The query was for the SRV record for _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.lohrmann.de [...] This is surely due to a

Hello, after having no problem with four Windows 2000 workstations and one Samba 2.something server for several years in a medical practice the practice software (DocComfort) dropped support for Windows 2000 beginning of this year. So I bought new hardware for the workstations and servers and installed from scratch. Now there are four Windows 7 Professional 32bit Workstations (with UAC disabled)

Em 10-09-2018 10:43, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:56:46 -0400 > spiderslack via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, all >> >> >> I trying setting domain samba with bind9-DLZ. I followed the tutorial >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller, >> but not

Hi!, My problem is this: I''m searching, in kernel code, the code that implement thi command: tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate $1 burst $2 drop flowid :1 I thought that this code was police.c but seem that it isn''t i must implement a proc file in the code and recompiling the kernel. Please send eventual response to my

Hi, I've a really big problem with my SAMBA 4.1.11 production server.... it doesn't want to start smbd anymore.... nmbd starts fine but not smbd. I've tried to start smbd in interactive mode to see what's happened : # /srv/progs/samba4/sbin/smbd -i -d9 produce a lot of lines about configuration (all fine), some last lines are : added interface lo ip=::1

Hello, I've been using samba for a few years but I use it only occasionally. Today, I've found out that since the upgrade to 4.9.2, smbd wouldn't start. I use Arch Linux. The command that starts samba on the systemd service is this: /usr/bin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group These are my configuration file's [global] parameters: bind interfaces only = Yes domain master =

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin

2017-06-21 14:29 GMT+02:00 Prunk Dump <prunkdump at gmail.com>: > Thank you very much Louis, Rowland, Mike ! > > I have made all the changes proposed by Louis but still have the same problem. > > -> kinit works now with /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab > ------------------------ > ~# kinit -k -t /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab FICHDC$ > ~# >

[root at samba ~]# su - testuser1 Last login: Thu Apr 16 11:36:01 EEST 2015 on pts/0 -bash-4.2$ passwd Changing password for user ABCD/testuser1. Changing password for ABCD/testuser1 (current) NT password: New password: Retype new password: passwd: Authentication token manipulation error -bash-4.2$ smbpasswd added interface ens192 ip=172.16.0.4 bcast=172.16.0.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 added