similar to: Problems with OS X 10.11.5

I'm actually seeing from the Apple Support Communities thread that this might all be due to the fact that OS X 10.11.5 clients are requiring SMB signing. Curiously, I noticed that my SMB4.conf file on my FreeBSD server didn't even possess a `client signing` flag. Might all this be resolved if I just add a `client signing = auto` flag for the server's SMB4.conf file, so that the OS X

Would signing cause a performance hit by an order of magnitude though? Is that expected behavior? If so, then it seems worth it to disable signing from the client, given that this is just a NAS on a LAN, not connected to the Internet. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:20 PM Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:08:40PM -0400, Seth Goldin wrote: > > I'm

I disabled client signing from the client side, via OS X's global nsmb.conf file: https://discussions.apple.com/message/30282470#30282470 The performance was back to over 600 MB/s, as compared to 60 MB/s with signing. It just seems a bit weird to me that Apple, in response to the Badlock bug, would have changed the OS X client default to something with such drastic performance implications,

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:44:26PM +0000, Seth Goldin wrote: > I disabled client signing from the client side, via OS X's global nsmb.conf > file: https://discussions.apple.com/message/30282470#30282470 > > The performance was back to over 600 MB/s, as compared to 60 MB/s with > signing. > > It just seems a bit weird to me that Apple, in response to the Badlock bug, >

2016-06-02 8:48 GMT+02:00 Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de>: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:44:26PM +0000, Seth Goldin wrote: > > I disabled client signing from the client side, via OS X's global > nsmb.conf > > file: https://discussions.apple.com/message/30282470#30282470 > > > > The performance was back to over 600 MB/s, as compared to 60 MB/s

Hi all ! I have a little problem here mounting or browsing samba shares. I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 running samba, and a share on that called public. when I try to mount that share it asks for password, and then gives an error: ex. libra# mount_smbfs //maxi@samba/public /mnt Password: mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) libra# I can list the shares with

Thanks to Will Saxon I'm finally able to mount Samba shares on my 5.1-R box using the command mount_smbfs -I 129.197.36.34 -W acct01 //bfosdick@129.197.36.34/net-11 /sp/net-11 which then prompts me for my password. So now the question is...how do I put this in /etc/fstab? What do I do about the password?

I can't seem to be able to mount any windows shares all I get is this error smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) a quick search on google leads me to believe it is broken, can anyone help me get this fixed?

Hi all, I am trying to come up with an architecture that has some redundancy. The idea is to hook up the two GbE LAN interfaces of a CentOS server to two Gigabit Ethernet switches. In case one switch goes down, there is a redundant path (the server is redundant too). Here is the idea: ----------- | GbE | PCs

Hi, The CirrOS image in the virt-builder default repository is quite outdated - 0.3.1. 0.3.5 was released two months ago. Are there any plans to update it? Thanks, Nadav.

Subject: [Sharing] CentOS 8.2 (2004) Linux Server is Compatible with Dell PowerEdge R640 1U Server Good day from Singapore, I have just installed CentOS 8.2 (2004) Linux Server on Dell PowerEdge R640 1U Server for "Donald Trump and Xi Jinping Investment Company LLP" (fictitious/fictional company name used) in Singapore on 11 August 2020 Tuesday. I can confirm that CentOS 8.2

Hi folks, I have an issue at a weird confluence of macOS Mojave's "nsmb" client, Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop, and Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu. Since I don't have much control over Apple or Adobe software, I'm hoping there's some smb.conf magic (or other sage advice) that might help me out of this jam. For reference, Samba is configured for SMB2-only access (i.e. durable file

Dear LLVM community, I am affiliated with the design and development of the Pony<http:/www.ponylang.org> programming language, which was recently published and has since been discussed on hacker news<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482483>, reddit [1]<http://www.reddit.com/r/ponylang>

Hello everyone, Quoting from Samba Team Blog #2 (25 Sept 2009): "Volker showed how to get more than 700MB/sec from Samba using smbclient and a modern Samba server, which shows what you can really do when you understand the protocol thoroughly and don't feel you have to invent a new one (SMB2 :-)." Would it be possible to get a complete accounting of how this was achieved? Thanks,

Am 15.06.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Ralph B?hme: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:57:52PM +0200, Sascha Kasch wrote: >> dear list, >> >> thanks for the great fruit speed-improvements. but... >> >> server config: >> debian 8 jessie >> sernet samba 4.2.2 packages >> >> here we see a problem that might not only be fruits problem but >> results in

Unfortunately, the GUI isn't quite set up to tell you what the error would be. When you use `$ sudo yum install whatever.rpm`, the output in the shell will often give you a clue as to what's going wrong--a missing dependency, etc. -- Seth. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:51 AM Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca> wrote: > Toralf Lund <toralf.lund at pgs.com> wrote: > >

Is there anyway to get gigabit networking for a fully virtualized guest? I''ve tried searching for this one, but all I get are results about gigabit networking for the host / dom0, nothing for domU. Thanks, Gordon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello, I have a little problem which I can't solve with Samba used under Debian Squeeze. (version of Samba : 3.5.6) I made a transfer speed between Samba server and a samba mount on the same PC copy to RAM and the same file directly to RAM. 1. HDD to RAM => 105-115Mo/s 2. Shared the same HDD directory with samba and mount to "/media" locally with (mount -t smbfs) : Samba to RAM

Hi, We''re setting up fairly large Lustre 2.1.2 filesystems, each with 18 nodes and 159 resources all in one Corosync/Pacemaker cluster as suggested by our vendor. We''re getting mixed messages on how large of a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster will work well between our vendor an others. 1. Are there Lustre Corosync/Pacemaker clusters out there of this size or larger? 2.

I've been planning to build a dual Opteron server for awhile. I'd like to get people's suggestions on a suitable motherboard. I've looked at the Tyan K8SE (S2892) and K8SRE (S2891) but would like to find more Linux-specific experiences with these boards. Some features I expect are at least 4 SATA (SATA-300?) ports, serial console support in the BIOS, USB 2.0 and IEEE-1394