similar to: access to share without authentication when security=ads

On 19/05/16 16:09, J. Scott Berg wrote: > I have samba configured with security=ads, and want to keep that so I can > have properly authenticated access to file shares. However, I also would > like to have anonymous access, even from non-domain accounts, to a printer. > This latter part is giving me trouble. My (edited) smb.conf is at the end of > this message. When I try to connect

Thank you Rowland! I guess that's part of my confusion, I'm not sure how to best debug where Centrify ends and Samba begins. But if these log.smbd errors indicate Centrify vice Samba, I'm good with that. My global smb.conf is (didn't bother with the commented out stuff): [global] security = ADS realm = <our domain name> workgroup = <our workgroup name> netbios name =

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:19:03 +0000 Scott Z. <sudz28 at hotmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Rowland! I guess that's part of my confusion, I'm not sure > how to best debug where Centrify ends and Samba begins. But if these > log.smbd errors indicate Centrify vice Samba, I'm good with that. My > global smb.conf is (didn't bother with the commented out stuff): I have

Hello, I have a CentOS 7 system configured as a samba server using ADS security. I am able to get users to login from PC's that are part of the AD domain but users coming from systems that are not part of the AD domain are not able to access the smb shares. Here is more information about the enviornment and issue: -- # rpm -qa | grep -i samba samba-client-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64

I probably should have lead with this, but I did not create or deploy this particular setup, I was charged with keeping it going after the main person left. I have zero experience with Samba or Centrify, or I should say *had* no experience until this. So, I frankly have very little idea of what most of these options are for or why they're set the way they are. I can certainly edit per your

I'm terribly sorry if this isn't the proper place/method by which to get help with troubleshooting Samba errors/issues, but it's the best one I could find. I have an instance of Samba 4.8.3 running on a Centos 7.6 VM server (kernel 3.10.0-957.1.3), along with Centrify 5.5.2-578, that will allow folks to map a shared drive from their Windows 10 machines generally fine, but quite

> a <- 0 ; for(i in (1:200000000)) a <- a + 1/i > b <- 0 ; for(i in (200000000:1)) b <- b + 1/i > c <- sum(1/(1:200000000)) > d <- sum(1/(200000000:1)) > order(c(a,b,c,d)) [1] 1 2 4 3 > b<c [1] TRUE > c==d [1] FALSE I'd expected b being the largest, since we sum up the smallest numbers first. Instead, c is the largest, which is

Hi, Is it possible to have non-authenticating shares on an server with security=ADS ? I have a RHEL server, with Centrify Express, and joined to a domain, but I would like to have a samba share that doesn't request a username/password for machines not on the domain. When I have a plain windows XP machine (not on the domain) attempt to connect, I get asked for a username/password. Is

Hi, Is it possible to have non-authenticating shares on an server with security=ADS ? I have a RHEL server, with Centrify Express, and joined to a domain, but I would like to have a samba share that doesn't request a username/password for machines not on the domain. When I have a plain windows XP machine (not on the domain) attempt to connect, I get asked for a username/password. Is

Details: Ubuntu 12.10 Samba version - Version 3.5.11-cdc-4.5.3-573 CentrifyDC version - CentrifyDC 5.0.2-396 Hi all, I am using Centrify Express to connect to my work domain, and I am using their version of Samba, hence the version listed above. I already posted this query to them, and they directed me to here, stating that this may be a Samba issue: Centrify forum

Hi everybody, i'm getting mad configuring samba to join an ADS, resolve domain users and groups and set ACLs via windows explorer on a share mounted with POSIX ACL and extended attributes. At the point where i am, i've managed to get Samba join correctly the domain with idmap_rid backend working fine. I can correctly set (add, remove, modify) file acls and extended attributes

Hello all, I was recently trying out NUMA placement for my guests on both x86_64 and ppc64 machines. When booting a guest on the x86_64 machine, the following specs were valid (obviously, just notable excepts from the xml): <memory unit='KiB'>8388608</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>8388608</currentMemory> <vcpu

Hi, Couldn't is.unsorted() bail out immediately here (after comparing the first 2 elements): > x <- 20000000:1 > system.time(is.unsorted(x), gcFirst=TRUE) user system elapsed 0.084 0.040 0.124 > x <- 200000000:1 > system.time(is.unsorted(x), gcFirst=TRUE) user system elapsed 0.772 0.440 1.214 Thanks! H.

Hi, I get strange code when using regalloc=greedy. A value spill is redundant and cleared, as another spill of same value is inserted. The former spill is however not NOP:ed, but KILL:ed, thus the operands get a kill status. The code becomes: %vreg301<def> = mv32Imm 200000000, pred:0, pred:%noreg, %CCReg<imp-def,dead>, %ac0<imp-use>, %ac1<imp-use>; aN32_0_7:%vreg301

Hello What is sequence for "auth methods" running in ADS mode ? How I can find this ? With best regards Martynas

Hi My Samba configuration uses ADS for user authentication. I have a request to grant users access who are not members of ADS. Is it possible to set up both smbpasswd and ADS authentication? I've looked through the archives without any success. If Samba 3.0 doesn't support this, can someone tell me how they have resolved this situation? Thank you for your help. Regards, Cathy ---

> > I love diving : ) > Ok mathias, Can you explain this. This i dont get.... Why is this output so different, and i dont mean the difference with NTDOMAIN\.. See the groups differences... between a ADDC and a member server.. Samba 4.4.3 ADDC id someusername uid=10002(NTDOMAIN\someusername) gid=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain users) groups=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain

Hi Rowland, Yes, thats done, the domain user exist on both servers in local sudo group. But why do i see much more groups on the ADDC, and even groups where this user is NOT member of, like 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group). See .. 2x 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group Greetz, Louis >

Hi everybody, i'm getting mad regarding a very serious (since it's happening on a production server) issue with a samba domain joined installation. This machine has worked perfectly for an year and the last configuration tune up and version upgrade (3.0.23c) went along fine in the first days of January. It's been two weeks approximately now since we started to have a bad issue, a

And dont forget : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad I also noticed and incorrect mapping, which "looks" like rights issues like in the thead here. ( it is imo not a right issue.. ) read on.. NTDOMAIN\enterprise read-only domain controllers:x:3000202: NTDOMAIN\domain admins:x:10001:NTDOMAIN\administrator NTDOMAIN\domain users:x:10000: NTDOMAIN\domain guests:x:10002: