similar to: on symbolic links

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: > I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent > or received to the server. > > Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. > > Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified mount.cifs. > > When I send utf-8 it gets received as dos. > > "é" for instance is #c3a9 in utf-8, and

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:19:37AM +0200, Xen wrote: > Jeremy Allison schreef op 12-07-2016 0:58: > >On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: > >>I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent > >>or received to the server. > >> > >>Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. > >> > >>Client: Older Synology

Hi, i have a rather weird and also problematic use case. My NAS provides permissions but I don't know how. The share is mounted using unix extensions and I am seeing user IDs. However my /local/ filesystem refuses me to allow to do anything unless I am root or set the noperms flag (ostensibly). This means that locally write access is denied but not remotely. The local user is UID 1000.

I run a Samba4 AD and joined a Synology NAS running Samba 3.6.9. I can access the shares using smbclient or mount -t cifs from all Linux machines (usually running Samba 3.6.6 clients). I can mount the shares from WinXP home and Win7 home. However, with a Win7 Ultimate machine joined to the AD most of the time it doesn't work. I can logon to the machine with my AD credentials, but I am

I set-up a basic AD DC using samba 4.1.9 successfully. I joined my NAS to the domain, i.e. I saw no errors and see the users and groups of my AD listed in the GUI of the NAS. When I try to connect to a share of the NAS the following happens: mgr at ws1:~$ smbclient -U 'AD\mgr' //nas/Test Enter AD\mgr's password: Domain=[AD] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.9] tree connect failed:

My Synology NAS runs Samba 3.6.9 and maps accounts using winbind. It is joined to my samba4 AD. I set "winbind use default domain=yes" and have no entry for "winbind normalize names". Strangely a group like "Domain Users" appears as "domain users", i.e. in all lower case. A translation which breaks idmapd for NFSv4. My Debian Wheezy 3.6.6 behaves the

I was transferring a file from a (slow) smbd server running on some NAS. The transfer speed is only 1MB/s but the NAS uses 100% CPU. Normally the NAS can handle 60MB/s download (from the NAS). Could it be that the connection uses encryption or something? What could be causing this slow speed? I have internet download speeds over this same connection surpassing 5MB/s. I cannot imagine why

Hai, My advice would be get a cable tester. Or see if you can loan some cable to test, with what your saying im almost sure you have a bad cable/connector/ethernet port somewhere. And check if you synoligy supports gigabit networks and put in a gigabit swich. Then see if you wifi is still faster then you ethernet. If you model is a 1xx, what happens when you disable https? DSM version is?

unlink fails to remove symbolic links. This is more prominent now -- when a package creates symbolic links during installation, 00LOCK is not removed. Martin > setwd(tempdir()) > fl <- tempfile(); file.create(fl) [1] TRUE > lnFile <- tempfile(); system(paste("ln -s", fl, lnFile)) > list.files() [1] "file19495cff" "file74b0dc51" > unlink(fl);

Hi, I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the client side. Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory: 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it: $ touch a $ ln -s a b $ ls -l total 0 -rw-rw-r--. 1 andi andi 0 Jan 6 14:42 a lrwxrwxrwx. 1 andi andi 1

Hello all, I have 2 identical Dell r510 servers with 10gig card, running centos 6 with samba-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.x86_64. I setup 16G ramdisk samba share on both and ran cp from local ramdisk to samba ramdisk mount. If I cp 12 1-gig files, I get combined 100MB/s transfer rate. Single file cp maxes out at about 15MB/s. Ftp transfer give me over 300MB/s. Running with 9000 MTU. Most smb.conf is

Hi All, I am using samba 3.5 on Synology NAS and I have just found out that I cannot copy from Windows7 large files (~100MB+) into a folder which is "under" a symbolic link on the samba server. The folder is on another volume than the original shared folder, therefore I am using "wide links=yes" in the settings. There is no problem when copying files from Linux or Mac machine.

Thanks Larry, no problem. I appreciate the input. Whenever you get a chance I’d really like to compare notes with someone who has NUT and a Synology to see why the heck mine doesn’t work! ;). I’m also using my Pi as the master like you. Thanks. Todd -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 14, 2020, 11:55 AM -0400, Larry Fahnoe <fahnoe at fahnoetech.com>, wrote: > On Fri, Aug

So I finally got a test in after I changed my RPi to the master and everything else (including my Synology) to slaves.  Before I did that though, I timed the shutdown of my Synology since it is the slowest slave to shutdown.  It took 40 seconds to shutdown, so I changed HOSTSYNC in upsmon.conf on the master (“Proton”) to 60.  I then did a test ("sudo upsmon -c fsd”). The slaves shutdown, then

Hello, Recently, the following problem started happening with a particular samba server: If i have a file open for reading (say, a pdf in xpdf) and then try to write to it (say, through recompiling a latex document) it complains that it cannot open the file for writing. this seems like a file lock issue but I am unsure where it is happening. My previous usage should be perfectly safe since

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:58:32PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 06.01.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Maier: > >Am 06.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > >>Can't reproduce this on latest 4.3.x (and I just tried). We did have > >>such a bug, but I remember fixing it :-). What Samba version is > >>running on the Synology ? > > >

On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > APC Back-UPS NS 650M1 UPS ---USB---> Synology NAS (DS416 - Master?) > ---Ethernet---> Netgear Managed Switch w/ uplink to router <---Ethernet--- > Servers (Ubuntu 20.04 - Plex, Pulsar, Proton - All three set as slaves) I'm guessing that the UPS supplies only the NAS, not the 3 Ubuntu machines. Do they have their own UPS's?

Hi, Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology since that is what they are already using and some of the nice out-of-the-box admin features. From what I can tell Synology runs a custom linux flavor so it should be possible to compile gluster on it. Any first hand experience with it? Thanks, Ben

On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > synoups: https://hastebin.com/xexafofiha.bash Wow! What a mess. It looks as if Synology wanted to write their own "NUT", but decided it would be easier to put their ideas in a script when they saw they could use upssched.conf to call it. NUT intends such a script for timer management. Synology use it for general system management.

>> I am running NUT on a Synology NAS with attached a USB APC UPS. > > Do you have upsd and upsmon running as daemons on the Synology DSM? > Yes I have them both running on the Synology DSM: root 7236 1 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:16 /usr/sbin/upsd root 7741 1 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/upsmon root 7744 7741 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:12