similar to: NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID in a SDC

Hi All I have a running SAMBA PDC on Debian Jessie on a PowerPC. I have backported Samba 4.3.18 and is working well. I have installed a SDC (if I may use that name) on a different network, the same version of Samba but on a Debian Jessie on AMD64. I followed every instruction in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_an_additional_Samba_DC_to_an_existing_Active_Directory. So every test

Hi More info: The log.smbd shows the following lines when tryied to login as Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2016/05/11 08:09:36.411968, 2] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:2686(lp_do_section) Processing section "[netlogon]" [2016/05/11 08:09:36.412108, 2]

Hi Thanks for you answer 1. Sorry It was a mistype: The version is samba_4.3.8+dfsg-1~bpo80+1. I backported from stretch to jessie as I want to keep my Debian environment clean. I do not fancy to compile it from source. I am a bit old fashion :-) :-) :-) 2. I use PDC and SDC as a legacy from previous versions. I Undestand why it is outdated but actually, even in Samba4, It is kind of true:

On 10/05/16 18:22, Kasandra Padisha wrote: > > Hi All > > I have a running SAMBA PDC on Debian Jessie on a PowerPC. I have > backported Samba 4.3.18 and is working well. Hi, where did you get 4.3.18 from ??? or do you mean 4.3.8, if so, try again with 4.3.9, this has some updates for regressions that 4.3.8 introduced. Oh and a 'PDC' is something else entirely, you have

On 10/05/16 20:36, Kasandra Padisha wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for you answer > > 1. Sorry It was a mistype: The version is > samba_4.3.8+dfsg-1~bpo80+1. I backported from stretch to jessie as I > want to keep my Debian environment clean. > I do not fancy to compile it from source. I am a bit old fashion :-) > :-) :-) OK, how about trying to backport 4.4.3 from

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:39:21 +0100 Kai via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second > system which should work as file share (filesrv01). > I was setting it up using this manual: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs > > Somehow, I broke

Hello everyone, I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second system which should work as file share (filesrv01). I was setting it up using this manual: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs Somehow, I broke the administrator's account. After I set up a test share, I got RPC server unavailable errors. I started investigating and

>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about a month >>>>>>>>>>> now. It >>>>>>>>>>> still works for all users except "Administrator". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I login to a Windows box with the

Il 17/01/15 17:10, Rowland Penny ha scritto: > On 17/01/15 14:39, Carlo wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about a month >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. It >>>>>>>>>>>>> still works for all users except "Administrator".

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:57:30 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I just found this in a log. It is the smbd log, to be exact. > > [2016/10/27 16:54:11.689360, 0] > ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:107(security_token_to_unix_token) > Unable to convert SID (S-1-5-11) at index 9 in user token to a GID. That is Authenticated Users, have you given any

Rowland, no domain user can authenticate on any system and running sysvolreset followed by sysvolcheck results in a crash. If the sysvol permissions are correct, sysvolcheck does not crash. If I attempt to join a NAS or workstation to the domain I get NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. Researching these symptoms turns up a thread about a corrupt idmap.ldb where a group SID and user SID may be the same or

Welcome everyone, I have to bother you and pick up your brains as I struggle to configure samba the way I want. It's the first time I deal with Samba4 as I'm trying to migrate boxes running on Centos 5 with Samba3 to Centos 7 with Samba4. The configuration I use works great on Samba 3 however when I use the same config on Samba4 I manage to authenticate as the user but once I want to

OK, I am both panicked and lost now. I stopped Samba, uninstalled, removed the source directory, removed every Samba directory on the system (/var/lib/samba, /var/log/samba, /var/cache/samba, /var/run/samba, /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba), rebooted, cloned 4-5-stable, configured, built, installed, provisioned a new domain, and this is what I get. I am following the guide to the letter.

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:52:09 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Slightly off-topic, but I thought setting those set the limits for > going into the NIS attributes tab in Windows. I understood the Samba > wiki to explain that using those lines is how you set the upper and > lower limits that Windows sees and uses. Is this incorrect? > > Lead

OK, I have now tried three versions of Samba and all react the same way. This tells me that I physically have an issue with a database or something. Is it going to be faster for me to simply wipe the entire AD, restore my Windows Server clean install image, and start over? I have until midnight to make this work. It is 1810hrs now. Lead IT/IS Specialist Reach Technology FP, Inc On 10/27/2016

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

I started getting NT_STATUS_INVALID at a client location recently and now everything has stopped working. Upon a day of searching and testing, I realized that my idmap.ldb is likely corrupt. How can I recover from this, shy of creating a new domain from scratch? The NAS devices no longer authenticate users so files are inaccessible, computers cannot access the sysvol, and sysvolreset/sysvolcheck

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, > except for 300000. Below is an example. > > root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ > total 16 > drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies > drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp

Hello, I have a strange problem with Samba AD member: It is accessible via \\server or \\server.domain.local But when I try to access it with its IP address, ex. \\10.15.10.1 I get access denied error and prompt for user and pass. Entering username and password with or without DOMAIN\ has no effect. The server is FreeBSD 10.1. It behaves the same way with Samba 4.1.18 and now with Samba 4.2.2

Am 2017-07-10 um 12:08 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > I would change /etc/hosts to this: > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 127.0.1.1 pre01svdeb01.my.tld pre01svdeb01 > > ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback > ff02::1 ip6-allnodes > ff02::2 ip6-allrouters > > But replace '127.0.0.1' with the real ipaddress of pre01svdeb01.my.tld > if