similar to: NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID in a SDC

Hi Upgrading without knowing whats the problem I feel a bit like with Windows or lots of comercial software: "The next version will solve all your problems" and we all know that's never true. I appreciate any help. Cheers -------- Mensaje reenviado -------- Asunto: NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID in a SDC Fecha: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:22:25 -0500 De: Kasandra Padisha

On 10/05/16 18:22, Kasandra Padisha wrote: > > Hi All > > I have a running SAMBA PDC on Debian Jessie on a PowerPC. I have > backported Samba 4.3.18 and is working well. Hi, where did you get 4.3.18 from ??? or do you mean 4.3.8, if so, try again with 4.3.9, this has some updates for regressions that 4.3.8 introduced. Oh and a 'PDC' is something else entirely, you have

Hi More info: The log.smbd shows the following lines when tryied to login as Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2016/05/11 08:09:36.411968, 2] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:2686(lp_do_section) Processing section "[netlogon]" [2016/05/11 08:09:36.412108, 2]

Hi Thanks for you answer 1. Sorry It was a mistype: The version is samba_4.3.8+dfsg-1~bpo80+1. I backported from stretch to jessie as I want to keep my Debian environment clean. I do not fancy to compile it from source. I am a bit old fashion :-) :-) :-) 2. I use PDC and SDC as a legacy from previous versions. I Undestand why it is outdated but actually, even in Samba4, It is kind of true:

On 10/05/16 20:36, Kasandra Padisha wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for you answer > > 1. Sorry It was a mistype: The version is > samba_4.3.8+dfsg-1~bpo80+1. I backported from stretch to jessie as I > want to keep my Debian environment clean. > I do not fancy to compile it from source. I am a bit old fashion :-) > :-) :-) OK, how about trying to backport 4.4.3 from

Welcome everyone, I have to bother you and pick up your brains as I struggle to configure samba the way I want. It's the first time I deal with Samba4 as I'm trying to migrate boxes running on Centos 5 with Samba3 to Centos 7 with Samba4. The configuration I use works great on Samba 3 however when I use the same config on Samba4 I manage to authenticate as the user but once I want to

OK, I am both panicked and lost now. I stopped Samba, uninstalled, removed the source directory, removed every Samba directory on the system (/var/lib/samba, /var/log/samba, /var/cache/samba, /var/run/samba, /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba), rebooted, cloned 4-5-stable, configured, built, installed, provisioned a new domain, and this is what I get. I am following the guide to the letter.

OK, I have now tried three versions of Samba and all react the same way. This tells me that I physically have an issue with a database or something. Is it going to be faster for me to simply wipe the entire AD, restore my Windows Server clean install image, and start over? I have until midnight to make this work. It is 1810hrs now. Lead IT/IS Specialist Reach Technology FP, Inc On 10/27/2016

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:39:21 +0100 Kai via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second > system which should work as file share (filesrv01). > I was setting it up using this manual: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs > > Somehow, I broke

>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about a month >>>>>>>>>>> now. It >>>>>>>>>>> still works for all users except "Administrator". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I login to a Windows box with the

Hello everyone, I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second system which should work as file share (filesrv01). I was setting it up using this manual: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs Somehow, I broke the administrator's account. After I set up a test share, I got RPC server unavailable errors. I started investigating and

Il 17/01/15 17:10, Rowland Penny ha scritto: > On 17/01/15 14:39, Carlo wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about a month >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. It >>>>>>>>>>>>> still works for all users except "Administrator".

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, > except for 300000. Below is an example. > > root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ > total 16 > drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies > drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp

My apologies, Rowland. I thought you wanted the SIDs. I provisioned the domain as follows. samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --realm=MEDARTS.LAN --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --domain=MEDARTS --server-role=dc --interactive I also answered a few questions during interactive provisioning such as password, but the defaults were good. Lead IT/IS Specialist Reach Technology FP, Inc On 10/27/2016

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:06:08 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > My apologies, Rowland. I thought you wanted the SIDs. I provisioned > the domain as follows. > > samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --realm=MEDARTS.LAN > --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --domain=MEDARTS --server-role=dc > --interactive > > I also answered a few questions

Slightly off-topic, but I thought setting those set the limits for going into the NIS attributes tab in Windows. I understood the Samba wiki to explain that using those lines is how you set the upper and lower limits that Windows sees and uses. Is this incorrect? Lead IT/IS Specialist Reach Technology FP, Inc On 10/27/2016 03:42 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016

Try using 4.4.5 vanilla or 4.5.1 with the patch attached. I don't you need to restore, but that's your call. I had the same problem as you and either fixed it for me. Thanks, Arthur On 10/27/2016 05:10 PM, Ryan Ashley via samba wrote: > OK, I have now tried three versions of Samba and all react the same way. > This tells me that I physically have an issue with a database or

On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 22:31:22 +1300 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:23 -0200, Vinicius Bones Silva via samba > wrote: > > Hi Rowland, > > > >      Just to let you know, we removed all the idmap entries we had > > on the smb.conf of our  > > two DCs and the ids reported by getent passwd at the DCs were

On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 16:32:38 +0000 Junior Oliveira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have an instance of samba 4 where users gonna authenticate on it > through a OpenLDAP server. The user from LDAP are already configured > with samba credentials. The issue is that they are set with an SID > different from the one of my machine with samba 4, i guess it's >