similar to: Multi tenancy and/or Hosted AD like solution

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:18 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:39:02PM +0200, D Grealish wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been doing some research and testing into implementing SAMBA 4 > > as a > > AD/DC role for offering "AD as a service" to various small > > companies, I've > > been testing SAMBA out in various different

Thanks Andrew, I've a few ideas on the go with a client atm, will need to scrap out some of the data before sharing, But like you said stateless-ness is the way i'm trying to go here. We have a central backend that we hope can build/re-provision samba in a container on a per tenant bases. However migrating and updating SAMBA binary with a "state volume" is something still an

Hi, We have an issue where an existing Win 10 client is already part of the domain, however it's DNS entry isn't updated, Is this bug related? https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 please see details below Ubuntu: 16.04.01 LTS Samba: Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu Samba Internal DNS 'allow dns updates = nonsecure' is not specified >ipconfig /registerdns Samba-Log: sudo

Hi, Tinc expert For use case of multi-tenancy use case, should I use multiple netnames (/etc/tinc/tenant1, /etc/tinc/tenant2/, etc.) for the network, so that even different tenant have overlapped network address will be possible to work in the same physical host? or can not?

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 08:46:45PM +0800, Bright Zhao wrote: > For use case of multi-tenancy use case, should I use multiple netnames (/etc/tinc/tenant1, /etc/tinc/tenant2/, etc.) for the network, so that even different tenant have overlapped network address will be possible to work in the same physical host? or can not? If you have multiple netnames, then you can have overlapping network

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:35:08PM +0800, Bright Zhao wrote: > The use case the shared default gateway for multi-tenant, if that the case the node who own the default gateway will have problem to route with different tenant who has overlapped address scope? Is it true when no any other tools like the namespaces? > > (tenant1)\ > (tenant2)——common node—— shared gw node—— Internet >

Hi, Guus The use case the shared default gateway for multi-tenant, if that the case the node who own the default gateway will have problem to route with different tenant who has overlapped address scope? Is it true when no any other tools like the namespaces? (tenant1)\ (tenant2)——common node—— shared gw node—— Internet (tenant3)/ But if the each tenant have it’s dedicate default gateway, but

Hello, I am trying to figure out, whether there are any best practices how to run a Samba AD DC in a container. First of all: why a container? Because obviously containers require less resources and are easier to update than multiple linux systems ? and I want to spend some of the savings into redundancy (multiple DCs, also distributed to serve different locations). Googling around I found

On 7/3/19 8:21 AM, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > Though I'm not sure if docker is the right tool for the job; samba as a > fat daemon running a bazillion subprocesses orchestrated by a persistent > database that's very sensitive to instances leaving and joining the > domain seems the antithesis to docker's philosophy. > Docker would be a terrible choice for this;

Hi, I was wondering if there was a possibility for remote sites to avoid having a "local" domain controller (Samba 4 AD DC) and still provide share access while WAN link is down. Something like the Windows credential cache on workstation. Regards

Downloaded 6.8 DVD1.iso, dd to stick. Went through same selections I have gone through since 6.2, only this time it got to the end and stated it couldn't find rear, which is under "backup client". OK, try it again without rear. This time it's yum-plugin-ovl from base (?). Then chrony, also in base (?). Then flightrecorder, libreswan, at least 2 of openmpi & co. and

In Samba 4.7.5, the man page for smb.conf contains the following text: " This boolean parameter controls whether smbd(8) will support SMB3            multi-channel.            This parameter has been added with version 4.4.            Warning: Note that this feature is considered experimental in Samba            4.4. Use it at your own risk: Even though it may seem to work well

> Yes. See the following bug for missing part: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11897 Well, then maybe the man page should say: " This boolean parameter controls whether smbd(8) will support SMB3 multi-channel. This parameter has been added with version 4.4. Warning: Note that this feature is considered experimental. Use it at your own risk. Even though it may seem

On 7/4/19 12:49 PM, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > * I am not (yet) familiar with LXD or nspawn. Do you have any pointer on how Samba DC works with LXD? > I've only used LXD for containerizing web applications so far.

KubeVirt is a custom resource (a kind of plugin) for Kubernetes which adds support for running virtual machines. As part of this they have the same problems as everyone else of how to import large disk images into the system for pets, templates, etc. As part of the project they've defined a format for embedding a disk image into a container (unclear why? perhaps so these can be distributed

So if someone has their own hardware and infrastructure but wants a software (not FreePBX but perhaps similar) what options do we have? Would like to virtualize it and not stuck with any one virtualization technology. Discuss... :) Travis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Nov 14, 2023, at 13:44, lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > How do you emulate AMR arch With QEMU: $ uname -r 5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2.x86_64 $ sudo dnf install qemu-user-static-aarch64 $ docker pull --platform=linux/arm64 tangentsoft/iperf3 $ docker export $(docker create --name iperf3 tangentsoft/iperf3) > iperf3.tar $ tar xf iperf3.tar $ file bin/iperf3

1. Thanks for the clarifications. I will stick to non-containerized OS X for now. 2. As an aside, I did try to build a Debian docker container by git cloning into it and using the Dockerfile in LLVM/utils/docker as a starting point: - some changes needed to updated packages (GCC in particular needs to be latest) and the Debian image (Debian 9 instead of Debian 8) pretty much sets up the docker

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:16:01PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:18 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > KubeVirt is a custom resource (a kind of plugin) for Kubernetes which > > adds support for running virtual machines. As part of this they have > > the same problems as everyone else of how to import large disk images

Hi Johannes: 1. Attached is the submitted PDF. 2. I have a notes section where I state: I am still unsure of the GPU extension I proposed as I dont know how LLVM plays into the GPU cross over space like how nvcc (Nvidia's compiler integrates gcc and PTX) does.I dont know if there is a chance that function graphs in the CPU+GPU name spaces are seamless/continupus within nvcc or if nvcc is just