similar to: truecrypt on synology as subfolder

Jeremy Allison schreef op 30-04-2016 1:06: >> Copying a file to my mounted samba share did not work, the files are >> created by they remain at 0 size. Then apparently smbd blocks in IO >> and never continues, never recovers. I cannot kill the process, I >> will have to reboot the NAS but it won't unmount filesystems so I >> need a hard reset. > > That

Jeremy Allison schreef op 01-07-2016 19:53: >> So the transition from regular filespace to LUKS filespaces >> (different volume) is not getting this LUKS filespace to appear >> empty to Samba, but not to the linux system itself. Is this to be >> expected? >> >> Is that normal operation, this? > > Hard to tell without logs I'm afraid. We'd need

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 12:18:11PM +0200, Xen wrote: > Jeremy Allison schreef op 30-04-2016 1:06: > > >>Copying a file to my mounted samba share did not work, the files are > >>created by they remain at 0 size. Then apparently smbd blocks in IO > >>and never continues, never recovers. I cannot kill the process, I > >>will have to reboot the NAS but it

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:26:35AM +0200, Xen wrote: > Just a small question. > > ============== > I was really just meaning to ask whether there are issues with > running truecrypt inside a samba share. > > My system had never had any issues but now I was writing to a folder > that is a truecrypt mount inside a samba share and the smbd process > writing into it

Am 02.07.2016 um 17:24 schrieb Xen: > Reindl Harald schreef op 02-07-2016 17:07: >> that's hardly something which can be changed in the application layer >> and you have similar problems when write large data to a slow >> block-device connected with USB > > So do you have any info on whether someone else could fix it? I mean, > there must be kernel people that

Xen schreef op 02-07-2016 17:01: > The most annoying thing about samba (and applies to NFS as well) as a > client, is that when there is some network error; the entire system > may hang as all reads of the root filesystem (or the / directory) can > block until that network mount thing is resolved, practically > rendering your entire system frozen. > > Is there not a solution

Hello, when i mount a truecrpyt volume with truecrypt 5.1a and synchronize data locally with rsync (version 2.6.9 protocol version 29) like this way: $ truecrypt myvolume.tc $ rsync -av /home/oliver/myfolder /media/truecrypt The myfolder is copied to /media/truecrypt like it should. But when i dismount the truecrypt volume and mount it again: $ truecrypt -d /media/truecrypt $ truecrypt

Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I build it it keeps failing here: Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function ?TrueCrypt::SharedPtr<TrueCrypt::EncryptionAlgorithm> TrueCrypt::EncryptionOptionsWizardPage::GetEncryptionAlgorithm() const?: Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp:45: error: no matching

Hi all, Has anyone used TrueCrypt on a XEN based machine before? I'm running CentOS 5.3 with kernel 2.6.18 but when I launch TrueCrypt, it keeps on telling me I need kernel 2.6.24 or later. "Your system uses an old version of the Linux Kernel. Due to a bug in the Linux Kernel, your system may stop responding when writing data to a TrueCrypt volume. This problem can be solved by

I have a WD Elements 2TB USB hard drive. I would like to encrypt the whole drive with TrueCrypt on my CentOS box. Could someone direct me to a tutorial on how to do this? Ideally, I would also like to access it with my WinXP box, but this part is optional. Thanks for your help. Mike.

I have seen people say both that rsync can efficiently copy truecrypt volumes. I got it working once with deltacopy but as I'm trying to get it to work from the command line, I cannot. It just transfers the whole file. I am using -rvs -inplace switches. Does anybody have any suggestions? _____________________________ Stephen Zemlicka Integrated Computer Technologies PH.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: > I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent > or received to the server. > > Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. > > Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified mount.cifs. > > When I send utf-8 it gets received as dos. > > "é" for instance is #c3a9 in utf-8, and

[please use reply-all to include the list.] > On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Daniel Green <ddgreen at gmail.com> wrote: > > I recently connected my UPS to my NAS. The NAS detected the UPS, and I checked the "Enable network UPS server" option and added relevant IPs to the "Permitted DiskStation devices" option. The NAS is running DSM 5.2-5592 Update 4, with a NUT

Jeremy Allison schreef op 12-07-2016 0:58: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: >> I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent >> or received to the server. >> >> Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. >> >> Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified >> mount.cifs. >> >> When I send

On 8/1/20 11:25 PM, Todd Benivegna wrote: > I'm hoping that someone can shed some light on this… I have a Synology > NAS (DS416) that has a feature where you can enable a “Network UPS > Server” which is a NUT server.  I have been trying to get the Synology > to shut down three Ubuntu 20.04 servers that I have. While it does > work when I test it out manually, sometimes when

Just achieved success using syslinux to multi-OS boot, including a WinXP System (boot) partition that's been encrypted with TrueCrypt (TC). You'll need syslinux version 3.81-pre13 or newer to get a working altmbr.bin file. I used: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/syslinux-3.81-pre13.zip Background: I started with a 'normal' multi-OS boot setup as

All, I recently connected my UPS to my NAS. The NAS detected the UPS, and I checked the "Enable network UPS server" option and added relevant IPs to the "Permitted DiskStation devices" option. The NAS is running DSM 5.2-5592 Update 4, with a NUT version of SDS5-2-2015Q1branch-5579-15061. I then attempted to connect my desktop via SNMP. My desktop is running Arch Linux, with a

Roger, I just ran a manual test, killing power and see what happens.  I set the Synology “Time before DiskStation goes into Safe mode” to 5 minutes so I didn’t have to wait like an hour until it powered down.  Here is the log: https://hastebin.com/ovuwilufeb.sql Everything appeared to be normal; the servers powered off and the Synology went into safe mode.  Power was then cut to the Synology

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I was wondering if I could ask this question here. > > Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block > encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I > found out later that most schemes randomize the result by injecting a >

How would I capture with Wireshark when it seemingly happens at random?  Whenever I test, everything appears to work normally.  I wish I could somehow replicate it.  Maybe I need to test manually and see if it’ll happen in front of me; I’ve never actually seen it happen… always happens when I’m away. -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 2, 2020, 12:12 PM -0400, Manuel Wolfshant