similar to: Nonfunctional linux/CIFS mounts after update (ADS / windows DC auth)

Failure for me is always: SMB PACKET: SMBsesssetupX (REPLY) > SMB Command = 0x73 > Error class = 0x6D > Error code = 49152 (0xc000) > Flags1 = 0x80 > Flags2 = 0x3 > Tree ID = 0 (0x0) > Proc ID = 12056 (0x2f18) > UID = 29165 (0x71ed) > MID = 3 (0x3) > Word Count = 0 (0x0) > NTError =

Both answered in my initial post; see below: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Glomski, Patrick wrote: > > I have been running in loglevel 10 and looking at the logs, but as I said > > in my initial post the credentials function fine with nautilus. Appended > is > > a connection log

I think I'm having the exact same issue using sssd. All symptoms described by Patrick exists in my system except for the .com thing. I haven't tried it yet. Using ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS, samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu, sssd 1.12.5-1~trusty1 -JGC > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Glomski, > Patrick > Sent: Tuesday, April

I have been running in loglevel 10 and looking at the logs, but as I said in my initial post the credentials function fine with nautilus. Appended is a connection log snippet where samba walks through a cascade of authentication methods and finally fails. Earlier in the log, samba successfully determines which domain controller to talk to and pulls its information. However, just before the

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:06:39PM -0400, Glomski, Patrick wrote: > Greetings, > > We use samba to share files to windows and linux machines and are in the > same boat as several others recently posting to the list. When badlock > patches came out, we updated our CentOS7 samba server (everything from > samba to sssd to krb5 to nss was updated) and immediately had problems with

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Glomski, Patrick wrote: > I have been running in loglevel 10 and looking at the logs, but as I said > in my initial post the credentials function fine with nautilus. Appended is > a connection log snippet where samba walks through a cascade of > authentication methods and finally fails. > > Earlier in the log, samba successfully

Hi, I updated our servers to 4.2.11, and I have a problem, but I'm not sure if the problem is related to the update. I am trying to use mount.cifs: > mount -t cifs -o username=username,password=super_secret,domain=WRKGRP //ip.of.our.samba/share /mnt > mount error(112): Host is down > Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) Host is up, i can use smbclient to

On 04/19/2016 3:49 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Dale, > > Du meintest am 19.04.16: > >>>>> As for smb.conf options: similar on the DCs and the smbserver, >>>>> with: >>>>> >>>>> server signing = mandatory >>>>> ntlm auth = yes >>>>> server min protocol = SMB2 >>>>> client max

L.S., Excerpt from my smb.conf on Samba 2.2.5: [global] ... security = share ... [BenD] public = no guest ok = no user = bzt only user = yes path = <...> writeable = yes browseable = yes printable = no ... Now, according to the manpage for smb.conf, I should only be able to log in and use service BenD as user bzt. Nevertheless, I can log in as any user as long as I know the password.

R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the ?Manual? html links are dead (although the ?Reference? and ?Miscellaneous Materials? html links do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. I?d like to get pointy-clicky html manuals working, to help migrate users from SAS to R. I do see R manuals on this system from the EPEL R rpm's in info and pdf form, for example at

On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: >> R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the ?Manual? html links >> are dead (although the ?Reference? and ?Miscellaneous Materials? html links >> do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. >> >> >> I?d like to get pointy-clicky html manuals

Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? Thanks, Sam

Hi all, A - I thought badlock mitigation was about encrypting SMB traffic, at least most part of it. And this encryption of most part of data transfer could (or should) lower performances. It seems I was wrong: smallest part (something like commands) are encrypted but not SMB traffic (ie file transfer). This for SMB protocol prior to SMB3 (which comes with windows 8). B - According to what I

Hi all About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and samba3x-client, samba3x-common, samba3x-doc, samba3x-domainjoin-gui,

On 20/06/16 19:53, Dale Schroeder wrote: > On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote: >> Hi all >> About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 >> server >> with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. >> Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would >> normally do I checked for Centos

I disabled client signing from the client side, via OS X's global nsmb.conf file: https://discussions.apple.com/message/30282470#30282470 The performance was back to over 600 MB/s, as compared to 60 MB/s with signing. It just seems a bit weird to me that Apple, in response to the Badlock bug, would have changed the OS X client default to something with such drastic performance implications,

Hi, Due to "Red Hat Vulnerability Response: BADLOCK", an automatic samba package RHEL5 update was apply on our system. This broke "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed" (error message logon client) in my environnement production. So, I use now 3.6.23-12.el5_11, I see they are new directive for smb.conf and some others more restrict

So happy for BadLock bug it finally pushed Ubuntu to upgrade samba :-) So many things work better * I can now sudo without having to newgrp first * I can now run id and get a list of all groups I am in * I can now run getent group and get a list of the domain groups but I now have two unexpected groups running the following I get id | sed 's/,/\n/g' | sort > id_without.txt id $USER

I'm seeing these problems with a samba-4.5.x that I wish to be a member of a samba-3.6.x PDC (NT4 style domain controller). =========================== net rpc join -S PDC ... smb_signing_good: BAD SIG: seq 1 Failed to join domain: failed to lookup DC info for domain 'EXAMPLE' over rpc: Access denied =========================== =========================== net rpc info ...

We applied latest MS security patches on our Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers. That had unexpected consequence of breaking all our Samba servers. They no longer can authenticate with our domain controllers. Looking into this we think it has to do with the BADLOCK security patch. We tried installing the latest Samba, version 4.4.5 which is supposed to be patched for the BADLOCK, but it is