similar to: NS Records for AD-Integrated Zones

On 4/25/2016 9:50 PM, Isaiah Olson wrote: > Hello, > > My domain was provisioned using a Windows 2008R2 server as the first DC, > and I then subsequently joined a Samba 4.4.2 DC running on Ubuntu 14.04.4 > and using BIND 9.9.5 as the DNS backend. Everything seems to be working > properly after I added an NC replica for the zones as per the > troubleshooting page. All zones

Anyway NS records are used when DNS server speak to DNS server, not by clients. So AD would work just fine without them. NS are used when a client ask something the configured resolver can't resolve by himself and when the resolver is not configured to forward request to relevant DNS server. IE: client search for toto.org and its resolver does not know anything about that zone. Resolver will

Hey everyone. I've had an AD domain running on a samba server for years now. I recently decided to add a second samba DC. (both 4.4.5) I ran through all the DNS checks mentioned here... https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Check_and_fix_DNS_entries_on_DC_joins All the entries were there! However, I noticed that the domain only has one NS record present. "host mydomain.com" returns both

Hi Denis, thanks a lot! > you said that the zone is empty. It is not a problem per se but for some > time Bind-DLZ has been a bit more strict and ask for a NS record for > every zone. So you just have to create a NS field in your zone pointing > to one of your DC and you should be fine. Internal DNS does not have > this requirements. > > samba-tool dns mydc

I have just joined a second DC to my Samba based AD, with Bind9_DLZ providing the DNS on DC2 (samba internal on DC1). I notice that the AD zone has not acquired an NS entry pointing to DC2. I presume that ideally such an entry should exist? I have tried to add something, but I cannot work out how to use samba-tool to add an RR for the root of a zone. If I miss the name argument out, or if I

--On Monday, October 05, 2015 10:46 AM -0400 "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > So, is there any convenient way to construct an IPTables rule to block > all IPs associated with a given Domain Name server? IPs have the reversed lookup "assosiated" with a NS. What do you mean with "associated"? Do mean all IPs that this DNS server

Yes I shut down the original DC, and noticed most of the AD relient services were hanging, and I think the culprit was DNS on the new DC. Would you guys recommend waiting for 4.5, or switching to the BIND backend? The only reason that I chose the internal DNS server in the first place was that I thought Kai said the BIND side wasn't getting as much love these days. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at

Hi everyone, So, I am working with an AD environment where there is one 2008R2 DC (which holds the PDC emulator FSMO role) and one Samba DC running on Ubuntu 14.04 (Samba Version 4.1.6-Ubuntu). I have been trying to set up the rsync workaround for SYSVOL replication, but I've been unable to get it working properly due to the inability to compile rsync with xattr support under Windows. My

Following: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC i've demoted and removed a DC. Seems all went as expected: root at vdcud1:~# samba-tool domain demote --server=vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it -U gaio Using vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it as partner server for the demotion Password for [LNFFVG\gaio]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it to synchronize

On 30/04/2020 13:47, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Aahh, how could i miss that one.. The server ip in resolv.conf .. Slapping head.. > Good you're here also Rowland :-) > I am more worried that he doesn't seem to have a smb.conf file Rowland

Dear Roland, and here we have one reasons / prove regarding Debian and current Samba BIND DLZ issues : http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/bind9/bind9_9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u3_changelog MSG >> " * disable dlz until we get a patch to make it build again" Well Debian Maintainers seems seeking missing the dlz patches that RHEL & SLES maintainers created

Last month I struggled with a severe DLZ issue and today I could solve it. Credits for the important idea go to Peter Serbe, thanks! I checked the DNS contents using RSAT. There was nothing wrong with SOA nor NS entries, but the reverse zones were actually forward zones with proper names in the in-addr.arpa. domain. I built proper reverse zones and deleted the forward-reverse zones and Bind

I just upgraded bind9 on my backup DC to 9.9.5-7-Debian and restarting the service failed: Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: starting BIND 9.9.5-7-Debian -u bind -4 Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: built with '--prefix=/usr' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var'

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:59:51 +0200 mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I never had a look on MS AD regarding that, to check if NS record is > created for each DC running DNS service or not. I couldn't find anything that explicitly says that each DC should have its own SOA in AD. What I could find was that each AD-integrated zone on a DC

Hi, I have to add a second DC to a Zone. I use the sernet packages Version 4.11 on a debian 10 host. The bind refuses to start: root at addc-zone02:~# systemctl status bind9 ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-04-30 14:51:58 EEST; 5s ago Docs:

And some more information about this strange effect apparently no-one has seen before. I now added the missing zone: samba-tool dns zonecreate verdandi 10.16.172.in-addr.arpa -U Administrator and it claims that the zone is okay, but the next one is missing: Dec 29 10:31:12 verdandi named[2601]: Loading 'ad.microsult.de' using driver dlopen Dec 29 10:31:12 verdandi named[2601]:

2016-10-18 15:25 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:59:31 +0200 > mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Anyway NS records are used when DNS server speak to DNS server, not by > > clients. So AD would work just fine without them. > > > > NS are used when a client ask

Thanks for the tip. I have still "zone has no NS records" This is the output (anonymized) of the script -- sorry, I will post it directly next time ;) Collected config? --- 2020-04-30-15:25 ----------- Hostname: addc-jor02 DNS Domain: example.com FQDN: addc-jor02.example.com ipaddress: 192.168.40.24 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com record verified ok, sample

This is the same origin that I reported on earlier. Apparently asking for an explanation of why they were probing our sites only encouraged them to make additional attempts. sshd: Authentication Failures: unknown (ip-173-201-178-18.ip.secureserver.net): 2 Time(s) unknown (ip-97-74-196-33.ip.secureserver.net): 2 Time(s) unknown (ip-97-74-202-95.ip.secureserver.net): 2

On 31/08/2020 19:59, Peter Pollock wrote: > Yes, it is 192.168.2.0/24 <http://192.168.2.0/24> > > Thank you. OK, try these files: /etc/bind/named.conf -----------start--------------- // This is the primary configuration file for the BIND DNS server named. // // Please read /usr/share/doc/bind9/README.Debian.gz for information on the // structure of BIND configuration files in