similar to: group share problems with winbindd and samba 3.6.23-30.el6_7

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "group share problems with winbindd and samba 3.6.23-30.el6_7"

2016 Apr 25
0
mixed problems with samba 4.2.10
I am the IT administrator for a group of researchers at a university. I have two SAMBA servers. One running CentOS 6 and one running CentOS 7. Both are running Samba 4.2.10 (4.2.10-6.el6_7 and 4.2.10-6.el7_2 respectively). When they were running the previous version of Samba everything worked fine and and both domain bound machines and non-domain bound machines could log in and mount/map both
2016 Apr 13
0
samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 - The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed
On 13/04/16 17:55, Bill Baird wrote: > Hi All, > > I am running Samba 3.6 in PDC mode (i know, i know...AD upgrade is in the > works). > > The most recent update for CentOS 6 (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64) appears > to have caused issues and I was forced to downgrade back > to samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64. > > When 3.6.23-30 is installed, users running Windows 7 x64
2016 Apr 13
3
samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 - The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed
Hi All, I am running Samba 3.6 in PDC mode (i know, i know...AD upgrade is in the works). The most recent update for CentOS 6 (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64) appears to have caused issues and I was forced to downgrade back to samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64. When 3.6.23-30 is installed, users running Windows 7 x64 receive the following error when trying access shares: "The trust relationship
2016 Apr 21
0
Moving from samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64 to samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7 has broken access to our MAC OS X clients
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Rowland penny wrote: > My understanding is that the Badlock patches fixed a multitude of security > problems, That's not disputed, and is why we have persevered in trying to make the patched version work instead of just reverting back to the previous version (you'll note that one response on this thread advocated doing that). >
2016 Oct 20
0
3.6.23-25.el6_7 and 4.2.10 and "Domain Admins" are/not Admins?
hi It can be so help [global] >---admin users = @nt_admins if not then I need 1. root at pdc:~# testparm 2. root at pdc:~# ldapsearch -xLLL -H ldapi:/// -b ou=groups,ou=arkhangelsk,dc=rugion,dc=ru ldap suffix = ou=arkhangelsk,dc=rugion,dc=ru ldap group suffix = ou=groups 3. try log level = 10 max log size = 1000 and go through the authorization in windows pc
2016 Oct 19
2
3.6.23-25.el6_7 and 4.2.10 and "Domain Admins" are/not Admins?
hi all I have two different Samba versions as PDC and BDC and depending on which one is "domain master" users which are domain admins are not recognized as such. Everything seems normal with 3.6.23-25.el6_7 as "domain master" but when I configure them so 4.2.10 is the master then I login to Win7 fine but Windows tells me that the user is not an Admin and I need to supply
2016 Apr 21
0
Moving from samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64 to samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7 has broken access to our MAC OS X clients
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:42:47PM -0500, Karen Magee wrote: > Also tied winbindd and that was a disaster of a > different sort. > > It wouldn't use the local unix groups first, which will cause way too > many issues. > > All along, however, the PCs that connect (when not trying to use > winbindd) have consistently > been able to connect and use
2016 Apr 21
2
Moving from samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64 to samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7 has broken access to our MAC OS X clients
On 21/04/16 12:46, Ian Collier wrote: > I hear your frustration - we've had the same troubles. My understanding > of this (which may be wrong) is: > > - The Badlock patches broke something in the Samba server which > means it's no longer able to contact the Windows AD in order to > authenticate users. My understanding is that the Badlock patches fixed a
2016 Apr 20
3
Moving from samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64 to samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7 has broken access to our MAC OS X clients
I've now tired both client ipc signing = auto or client signing = required server signing = auto --- that did not work...Also tied winbindd and that was a disaster of a different sort. It wouldn't use the local unix groups first, which will cause way too many issues. All along, however, the PCs that connect (when not trying to use winbindd) have consistently been able to connect and
2015 Dec 15
0
CEBA-2015:2642 CentOS 6 samba BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2642 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2642.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6fa40ca76f3ba80ad56ce80b2b2f787148f6d019ec15400e62871d4993bdf527 libsmbclient-3.6.23-21.el6_7.i686.rpm
2016 Jan 07
0
CESA-2016:0011 Moderate CentOS 6 samba Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0011 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0011.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 72950df9a934b10dfa2ba2eda29a9c67fccd7316b23d05374cd61dc7039ee9b9 libsmbclient-3.6.23-24.el6_7.i686.rpm
2016 Mar 15
0
CESA-2016:0448 Moderate CentOS 6 samba Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0448 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0448.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b5decc0e8074aa9e596c96b3323adab98335d5cd675cb9b51ccee1dd26353bed libsmbclient-3.6.23-25.el6_7.i686.rpm
2016 Apr 13
0
CESA-2016:0611 Critical CentOS 6 samba Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0611 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0611.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d5f3744dc798fa513d4856aad3a992e836a3c6b29244fbfef4b0b42da1badbac libsmbclient-3.6.23-30.el6_7.i686.rpm
2016 Mar 16
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 133, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2016 Apr 13
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 7
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2016 Jan 08
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 131, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2015 Dec 16
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 130, Issue 5
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2016 May 26
0
Regression: The 'net' command is now failing to login (UNKNOWN ENUM VALUE 1003?)
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:38 PM, pisymbol . <pisymbol at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello: > > Platform: CentOS 6.7 x86-64 > > $ rpm -qa | grep samba > samba-common-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 > samba4-libs-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 > ie-samba-utils-3.6.13-7.x86_64 > samba-winbind-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 > samba-client-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 >
2016 May 25
2
Regression: The 'net' command is now failing to login (UNKNOWN ENUM VALUE 1003?)
Hello: Platform: CentOS 6.7 x86-64 $ rpm -qa | grep samba samba-common-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba4-libs-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 ie-samba-utils-3.6.13-7.x86_64 samba-winbind-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-client-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.i686 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 Problems began after requiring SMB signing (I forgot the specifics but it was
2016 May 26
2
Regression: The 'net' command is now failing to login (UNKNOWN ENUM VALUE 1003?)
This spnego stuff makes me think about "client ldap sasl wrapping = sign" to be added in some cases. There are threads related to that posted recently. Disabling spnego is, if I'm not mistaken, disabling Kerberos. Disabling Kerberos should not be what you really want with AD : ) 2016-05-26 13:23 GMT+02:00 pisymbol . <pisymbol at gmail.com>: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:38