similar to: trust relationship - a bit of a puzzle

Hello In 2 different subnets I have setup 2 identical samba servers (RH 6.5) as fileservers for windows clients. Each is a member of it's own AD Domain (Windows 2003 Servers). The problem: one of them only is accessible and sharing locally. On the windows-client, trying to mount a share gives this error: C:\Users\testuser>net use y: \\samba_server\topfolder /user:testuser System

No takers thus far. These are the Samba 4.2 changes to which I previously referred (https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.2.0.html) : For the client side we have the following new options: "require strong key" (yes by default), "reject md5 servers" (no by default). E.g. for Samba 3.0.37 you need "require strong key = no" and for NT4 DCs

Hi. I we are migrating form domain ad.adc.com to ad.xyz.com , there is a trust between the two domains. Before the move the file server was work perfectly, post migration I get the following in the samba logs [2013/08/19 08:07:15.961679, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:342(reply_spnego_kerberos) Failed to verify incoming ticket with error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE! [2013/08/19 08:07:25.983662, 1]

You may have included this in another email however I will ask anyway, did you set DNS to your server in the Linux and Windows clients? Can you check if a Windows Server can join? Can you use DNS management to check the DNS on you samba server? On Mar 28, 2016 2:15 PM, "Dale Schroeder" <dale at briannassaladdressing.com> wrote: > No takers thus far. These are the Samba 4.2

I have an NT domain on Debian Stretch. It's been upgraded numerous times, but has been running for almost a decade. Since upgrading from 4.1.17 to 4.3.3 (huge Debian jump), then to 4.3.6, clients cannot connect to shares. Prior to upgrading, I found the changes mentioned for 4.2 regarding NT domains and applied them. Even so, I still cannot connect to network shares nor print to

Hai, Im wondering here.. If the client is a windows 10 pc connecting, > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:419(reply_nt1) using SPNEGO > ../source3/smbd/negprot.c:761(reply_negprot) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > ../source3/smbd/process.c:554(receive_smb_talloc) > receive_smb_raw_talloc failed for client > ipv4:10.55.66.82:59271 read error = NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_RESET. And i

hi guys I have classic nt-style samba and windows 10 clients (one even updated to 1803 and works okey) but(as there always have to be a but).. I've just got new installation off a 1709 build but this time it's "Education N" (where Pro 1709 does not have this problem) and the problem is: I cannot get to shares, on that "Education N" I get no login/credentials

Hi, I got no replies to my last post "win 7 client can't map drive: getpeername failed" Anyway I've dug a little deeper on the server side by setting log level 10 and found the error: "Transport endpoint is not connected" Basically I compared the logs (several thousand lines!) from two windows 7 clients, one of which always works (the good client) and one which

I have a toshiba copy machine that is also used as a scanner. The scanner can be set to store files to a SMB UNC. So I create a username/password for the scanner to login with, then configured a unc path for to store to. All was working well for a while. Then the scanner stopped storing to the samba share. Initial analysis seemed to indicate that the username/password was failing. So I reset it

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:03:57PM -0700, David Bear via samba wrote: > I have a toshiba copy machine that is also used as a scanner. > The scanner can be set to store files to a SMB UNC. So I create a > username/password for the scanner to login with, then configured a unc path > for to store to. All was working well for a while. > > Then the scanner stopped storing to the

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2019 12:13 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:38:58 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>

I am seeing these errors every night in the logs. Should I be worried about any of them? The only thing I have noticed is slow log ons. Jonn CentOS 5.6 x86_64 Samba 3.5.8 CTDB 1.0.114 DRBD/GVFS --------------------- samba Begin ------------------------ **Unmatched Entries** auth/token_util.c:525(debug_nt_user_token) NT user token: (NULL) : 1 Time(s)

Hello, list; This is my second try asking for help. One person responded and provided help, but I still can't seem to work this out. I've searched, but have failed. I'm not new to Samba, but I can and do make mistakes...so here I am. I have a fresh install of Ubuntu 13.10 with Samba 3.6.18. I have Kerberos properly configured and have successfully joined the domain, and can list

Excuse me if I bother you, but I badly need help. Let me describe the situation. In my network there is a group of Windows boxes in a Windows domain (THE_DOMAIN), three computers with Debian 9.x not linked to the domain (in a workgroup named TECHNOLOGY, and the parameter security=user) one of which I use, and other three computers with Debian 7.x in another workgroup (and security=share, so no

Hello all. We are running Samba 3.6.6 on a Debian 6.0.6 server. We made the upgrade from 3.6.5 to 3.6.5 about a week ago and ever since we have lost the ability to map Samba shares from our Windows XP SP3 and Windows 7 clients: Here's an example from my workstation (logging verbosity set at 10): [2012/11/29 15:23:58.120087, 3] smbd/process.c:1467(switch_message) switch message

Hi, I've been fighting against a file server with samba 3.6.9-151.el6 authenticating from a windows 2003 server. I've read a thousand posts and howtos with all kind of samba versions without success. It looks like windbind is not processing things right. I've set the unix permissions on the folder to CANAL4\graficos right and the parent folder is world readable so this should not be

El vie, 12-07-2019 a las 21:05 +0100, Rowland penny via samba escribi?: > On 12/07/2019 20:23, Alberto Jos? Garc?a Fumero via samba wrote: > > Excuse me if I bother you, but I badly need help. > > > > Let me describe the situation. In my network there is a group of > > Windows boxes in a Windows domain (THE_DOMAIN), > What is the Windows DC ? > > three

hi everyone to experts, all experienced sambians - when one uses HA cluster one deems CTDB needless, redundant? Or you somehow team those two together? Or maybe ctdb is so superior that it is ruling this domain and if HA exists it leaves Samaba to ctdb? many thanks, L.

Using samba 3.5.12 on aix 6.1 when I set "server signing = mandatory" nothing can connect to my server. Included the smb.conf followed by errors showing up in the level 10 debug output. Thanks, >cat /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf [global] workgroup = somename netbios name = someserver server string = somename Samba Server %v security = user

On 12/07/2019 20:23, Alberto Jos? Garc?a Fumero via samba wrote: > Excuse me if I bother you, but I badly need help. > > Let me describe the situation. In my network there is a group of > Windows boxes in a Windows domain (THE_DOMAIN), What is the Windows DC ? > three computers with > Debian 9.x not linked to the domain (in a workgroup named TECHNOLOGY, > and the parameter