similar to: samba 4.2.10 makes shares unusable on XP

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:03:21AM +0300, Владимир Терентьев wrote: > Hi. Try add this to your config in global section. > > socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=262140 > SO_SNDBUF=262140 Sorry to step in, but SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF are almost always bad for performance, unless you know *EXACTLY* what you're doing at a packet level. A general

Hi, we have network performance issues with Samba (Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6) on one of our servers. The maximum throughput from client to server is 110 MB/s (read/write) under Windows 7 x64 (single 10GE NIC). When using NFS on a different Linux workstation we're getting much higher rates, around 500-700 MB/s. I still can't find the problem. Setup server: CentOS 6.6 Samba 4.7.2

Am 02.11.2016 um 03:05 schrieb Saint Germain via samba: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:10:12 +0200, Achim Gottinger via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote : > >> >> Am 28.10.2016 um 08:18 schrieb Saint Germain via samba: >>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:30:09 -0700, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> >>> wrote : >>> >>>> On Thu, Oct

Am 02.11.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Saint Germain via samba: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:44:05 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote : >>>>> I just tried and when I limit samba to SMB2 connections (in >>>>> smb.conf), Nautilus/gvfs cannot connect (it doesn't even see the >>>>> share). >>>>>

Am 02.11.2016 um 20:32 schrieb Saint Germain via samba: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:45:31 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote : >> Am 02.11.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Saint Germain via samba: >>> On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:44:05 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote : >>>>>>> I just

Hi All, I just setup a new server and added it to my domain last week and it has been working well. We are running a NT4-style Samba PDC for our domain controller. This server is running the CentOS packages for Samba 4.2.10-6 as a domain member. My issue is that I have one Windows 7 workstation that will only auto-negotiate to the NT1 protocol. If I run smbstatus, all of my other workstations use

*testparm -v | grep "client min protocol"* client min protocol = CORE On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:50 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com < lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/19/2016 2:43 PM, Bill Baird wrote: > > I am accessing the new member server. All my other servers are still on > 3.6.x. > > Both settings are set to "default". > > Will look at

I am accessing the new member server. All my other servers are still on 3.6.x. Both settings are set to "default". Will look at logs now. Thanks! On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:39 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com < lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/19/2016 2:08 PM, Bill Baird wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I just setup a new server and added it to my domain

just to verify basic facts: Did you cross check vie network sniff, on which SMB protocol versions Server + Win 7 clients agree ? Or did you pin down via registry ? AFAIK only starting with win 8 or win 10 clients you could ask with powershell, which protocol version is in use. Did you also cross check samba logs for a name resolution issue ( windows names, not DNS) if one of your boxes is an

Hello, sorry for the delay, kinit goes fine, here is the output of klist : Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: administrator at RONA.LOC Valid starting Expires Service principal 15.08.2017 13:36:07 15.08.2017 23:36:07 krbtgt/RONA.LOC at RONA.LOC renew until 16.08.2017 13:36:03 ------ here's the output of smbclient -k -L //sambadc.rona.loc -d9

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: > Hi Micha, > > no, I have to this. I'm normally just check what smbstatus shows: > > 33837   BGC\pkoch    users        XXX (ipv4:XXX:51118)    SMB2_10 > > Bye the way - 45 MB/s is not so bad, I just wanted to know if it's > possible to get 90MB/s or at 10G a little bit more. >

Hello, I'm using the latest git 4.2.0 samba version (4.2.0rc4-GIT-93b73bf, to get latest vfs_fruit module). I noticed the following strange behavior with OSX clients (10.10.1, 10.10.2 beta): When they connect using either smb 3.0 or 2.1 (verified on the server with `smbstatus` and the `version` column `SMB3_00` or `SMB2_10` respectively), symbolic links pointing at non existent files are not

Hello: Platform: CentOS 6.7 x86-64 $ rpm -qa | grep samba samba-common-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba4-libs-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 ie-samba-utils-3.6.13-7.x86_64 samba-winbind-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-client-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.i686 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 Problems began after requiring SMB signing (I forgot the specifics but it was

Dne 2017/03/20 v 10:05 Rowland Penny napsal(a): > On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 23:23:58 +0100 > Michal Kavan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> yes, its looks like win7/10 problem (but only on samba 4.x) to me, >> but i have no idea what to do (except downgrade to 3.6.x) >> >> >> server max protocol = SMB3 >> client max protocol = NT1

Hi everyone, I would like to know what configuration do you use to run samba 4 (min/max protocol) with Windows 7,8 and 10 (especially after 1709 update) at the same time ? Regards. Michael. --

hi All, We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. We use this smb.conf: [global] socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072 read raw = yes server string = %h write raw = yes #oplocks = yes max xmit = 131072 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes use sendfile=yes block size = 131072 load printers = no aio read size

After having migrated my machines and user to Samba 4.3.11 on Ubuntu 16.04.1 (no domain upgrade, new provision, all accounts new defined) and old data copied over to the new machines, I have now a broader testbed and notice issues I didn't see prior to that. Having roaming profiles (defined in the user object in LDB)... Seemingly at random smbd keeps locks on NTUSER.DAT and ntuser.ini for a

Hi Rowland > OK, two things jump out at me, I wouldn't use 'EXAMPLE.COM' for the > workgroup name, I would have just used 'EXAMPLE' i.e. no dot in the name. > > I understand, but, change the workgroup involves migrate domain, right ?? Or can I simply change workgroup and restart samba ?? > Your idmap config stack is incorrect, you only have settings for the

I cannot connect as guest from Win10 to Samba anymore, since I removed "server max protocol = NT1" net use \\%IP%\testshare /user:"" "" /persistent:no System error 58 has occurred. The specified server cannot perform the requested operation. It works when I supply a userid and password. It works from Win7. It fails only in the combination Win10, SMB3,

Hello, I have try windows 10 in an Samba 4.4.5 NT4-style domain. With some registry hacks (DomainCompatibilityMode and DNSNameResolutionRequired) it can be an member of the domain. When i try to login with domain member i get the error "There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request" At