Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol"
2016 Apr 19
2
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
I am accessing the new member server. All my other servers are still on
3.6.x.
Both settings are set to "default".
Will look at logs now.
Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:39 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com <
lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/19/2016 2:08 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I just setup a new server and added it to my domain
2016 Apr 19
2
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
*testparm -v | grep "client min protocol"*
client min protocol = CORE
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:50 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com <
lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/19/2016 2:43 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
>
> I am accessing the new member server. All my other servers are still on
> 3.6.x.
>
> Both settings are set to "default".
>
> Will look at
2016 Apr 19
2
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
Just saw that, as well.
After running the commands to enable SMB2 & SMB3 and rebooting...no luck.
Will keep searching for other registry settings.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:27 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com <
lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/19/2016 3:24 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
>
> When I search for "smb2", I get nothing in my log file for the NT1 limited
>
2016 Apr 19
3
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
When I search for "smb2", I get nothing in my log file for the NT1 limited
system. If it is a workstation issue, that would be great. I'll search
around for what settings to change. Maybe SMB2 was inadvertently disabled.
Thanks for all of your help on this!
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:20 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com <
lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/19/2016 3:11
2016 Apr 19
2
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
That does indeed show "default".
For logs, I tested with my system and a system that gets SMB2. Any tips
for what I might be looking for?
Early on in the logs, I see this for the NT1 system (no mentions of smb2
anywhere)
[2016/04/19 14:48:37.738460, 3, pid=21479, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
../source3/smbd/negprot.c:395(reply_nt1)
using SPNEGO
[2016/04/19 14:48:37.738476, 3,
2016 Apr 19
0
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
On 4/19/2016 2:51 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
> /testparm -v | grep "client min protocol"/
> client min protocol = CORE
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:50 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com
> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com
> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 4/19/2016 2:43 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
>>
2016 Apr 19
0
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
On 4/19/2016 2:43 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
> I am accessing the new member server. All my other servers are still
> on 3.6.x.
>
> Both settings are set to "default".
>
> Will look at logs now.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:39 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com
> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com
>
2016 Apr 13
3
Badlock bad luck
I'm seeing the exact same behavior in my environment (NT4 PDC, not AD). I
had to downgrade samba get systems working again.
The full error message is:
"The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain
failed".
Did you have any luck finding a solution?
2016 Apr 19
0
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
I tried disabling SMB1 and enabling SMB2/3 and after reboot, I can't
connect to any of my Samba servers...so looks to definitely be a
workstation issue.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Bill Baird <bill.baird at phoenixmi.com>
wrote:
> Just saw that, as well.
>
> After running the commands to enable SMB2 & SMB3 and rebooting...no luck.
> Will keep searching for other
2016 Apr 19
0
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
On 4/19/2016 3:24 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
> When I search for "smb2", I get nothing in my log file for the NT1
> limited system. If it is a workstation issue, that would be great.
> I'll search around for what settings to change. Maybe SMB2 was
> inadvertently disabled.
>
> Thanks for all of your help on this!
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:20 PM, lingpanda101
2018 Sep 16
3
ClassicUpgrade: ERROR(<type 'exceptions.ValueError'>): uncaught exception - zero length field name in format
Hi All,
Attempting to do a classicupgrade and getting this error:
*Adding groups*
*Importing groups*
*Committing 'add groups' transaction to disk*
*Adding users*
*Importing users*
*Adding users to groups*
*Committing 'add users to groups' transaction to disk*
*ERROR(<type 'exceptions.ValueError'>): uncaught exception - zero length
field name in format*
* File
2018 Sep 16
3
ClassicUpgrade: ERROR(<type 'exceptions.ValueError'>): uncaught exception - zero length field name in format
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 10:51:25 -0400
Bill Baird via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I ran the same thing with 4.8.5 and it work without any issues:
>
> Adding groups
> Importing groups
> Committing 'add groups' transaction to disk
> Adding users
> Importing users
> Committing 'add users' transaction to disk
> Adding users to groups
>
2016 Apr 13
3
samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 - The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed
Hi All,
I am running Samba 3.6 in PDC mode (i know, i know...AD upgrade is in the
works).
The most recent update for CentOS 6 (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64) appears
to have caused issues and I was forced to downgrade back
to samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64.
When 3.6.23-30 is installed, users running Windows 7 x64 receive the
following error when trying access shares:
"The trust relationship
2016 Apr 19
0
Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
On 4/19/2016 2:08 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just setup a new server and added it to my domain last week and it has
> been working well. We are running a NT4-style Samba PDC for our domain
> controller. This server is running the CentOS packages for Samba 4.2.10-6
> as a domain member. My issue is that I have one Windows 7 workstation that
> will only auto-negotiate
2006 Jun 30
1
Intel VT-x & Xen
Hi All, Just curious if anyone is currently using Xen 3on any of the new Intel Xeon processors that support the VT-x extentions. With the VT-x (or AMD's Pacifica) you can run unmodified guest operating systems...so we are looking into buying a new server to run a few virtual machines of CentOS & a few with Windows. If anyone has done this, I would love to hear about their
2018 Sep 16
1
ClassicUpgrade: ERROR(<type 'exceptions.ValueError'>): uncaught exception - zero length field name in format
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:28:56 -0400
Bill Baird <Bill.Baird at phoenixmi.com> wrote:
> Python is 2.6, but why wouldn't it throw an error during
> configure/make?
No, the python code isn't compiled.
>
> I'm using Amazon Linux.
Would you like to raise a bug report ?
Here:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/
Rowland
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 11:22 AM Rowland Penny
2018 Sep 14
2
kpasswd_samdb_set_password: domain\user (S-...) is changing password of user@domain
I have dsdb_password_audit:5 & dsdb_password_json_audit:5 enabled, but I
don't get the message I included.
I instead get an audit log that a password was changed...but not by who.
Was hoping to get more info in a single log entry, so I can track who on my
staff is doing password resets and setup email alerts via my logging system.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:49 PM Andrew Bartlett
2018 Sep 14
2
kpasswd_samdb_set_password: domain\user (S-...) is changing password of user@domain
Is there a way to translate the userSid into a human readable format, so I
don't have to look it up each time?
For now, my workaround for now is to set my log level to 5, but then turn
lots of stuff down to 1 manually. Like this:
log level = 5 tdb:1 printdrivers:1 lanman:1 smb:1 rpc_parse:1 rpc_srv:1
rpc_cli:1 passdb:1 sam:1 auth:1 winbind:1 vfs:1 idmap:1 quota:1 acls:1
locking:1 msdfs:1
2018 Sep 24
1
List of Expired Accounts?
Hi All,
Is there a built-in command to get a list of all expired accounts, or
output a list of all users and expiration date? All the scripts I find seem
to be PowerShell scripts that relay on some "Web Service" that I don't have
or do one user at at time.
Or if anyone has a script they are willing to share, that would be greatly
appreciated. I'm primarily looking for a way to
2018 Sep 14
2
kpasswd_samdb_set_password: domain\user (S-...) is changing password of user@domain
Hi All,
I'm prepping for a classicupgrade and noticed that if I set log level = 5,
I get a log like this when we update a password for a user:
*kpasswd_samdb_set_password: DOMAIN\username(S--x-x-x-xxx-xxx-xxxx) is
changing password of username at domain*
I can't seem to figure out what debug class I need to enable to still get
this alert, but still set my default logging to 1.
Thanks