Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Samba4 quit working after update"
2016 Apr 19
2
Samba4 quit working after update
I set the Samba debug level to 4 a bit ago, so the logs are a bit
noisy--before that, there didn't seem to be much log activity when I
produced that error.
So with the debug level at 4, these entries kind of stand out a bit:
[2016/04/19 09:55:27.662721, 2]
../source4/smbd/process_standard.c:123(standard_child_pipe_handler)
Child 16336 (winbindd) exited with status 1
These entries repeat
2016 Apr 19
3
Samba4 quit working after update
Here's what I get at level 0 right after stopping/starting Samba:
[2016/04/19 12:27:06.043469, 0]
../source4/smbd/server.c:372(binary_smbd_main)
samba version 4.3.8-Ubuntu started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2015
[2016/04/19 12:27:06.157629, 0]
../source4/smbd/server.c:490(binary_smbd_main)
samba: using 'standard' process model
samba: setproctitle not
2016 Apr 19
2
Samba4 quit working after update
There is no winbindd--it was never installed. I don't recall exactly why I
didn't install it, but I seem to recall something about Samba4 in an AD
domain control role not needing it. I ended up using SSS instead.
Sanatized smb.conf:
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DCS
realm = DCS.LOCAL
netbios name = SERVER
server role = active directory domain
2016 Apr 19
4
Samba4 quit working after update
On 19/04/16 21:08, Thomas Smith wrote:
> It was my understanding that winbind wasn't necessary for Samba4. This
> server has been running for months without it.
>
> Sanatized smb.conf:
>
> # Global parameters
> [global]
> workgroup = DCS
> realm = DCS.LOCAL
> netbios name = SERVER
> server role = active directory domain
2016 Apr 19
0
Samba4 quit working after update
On 4/19/2016 1:08 PM, Thomas Smith wrote:
> I set the Samba debug level to 4 a bit ago, so the logs are a bit
> noisy--before that, there didn't seem to be much log activity when I
> produced that error.
>
> So with the debug level at 4, these entries kind of stand out a bit:
>
> [2016/04/19 09:55:27.662721, 2]
>
2016 Apr 19
0
Samba4 quit working after update
It was my understanding that winbind wasn't necessary for Samba4. This
server has been running for months without it.
Sanatized smb.conf:
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DCS
realm = DCS.LOCAL
netbios name = SERVER
server role = active directory domain controller
dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8
idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
debug level =
2016 Apr 19
0
Samba4 quit working after update
Ok, thank you--that worked, but it doesn't make sense.
The server's been operational for months without winbind. Did something
change in Samba that it won't operate now without it?
I specifically remember reading that winbind wasn't necessary and, in fact,
wasn't recommended with Samba 4 AD.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:27 PM Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
2016 Apr 19
0
Samba4 quit working after update
On 4/19/2016 3:39 PM, Thomas Smith wrote:
> Here's what I get at level 0 right after stopping/starting Samba:
>
> [2016/04/19 12:27:06.043469, 0]
> ../source4/smbd/server.c:372(binary_smbd_main)
> samba version 4.3.8-Ubuntu started.
> Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2015
> [2016/04/19 12:27:06.157629, 0]
>
2018 May 24
5
Samba 4.8 RODC not working
Hi,
It's my first try to setup RODC using Samba 4.8. We have latest Samba 4.7 environnement with 2 DC and some file servers.
Joining the DC to the domain is OK using samba-tool domain join command. The domain controller appears in the DC list (MMC)
However, users cannot be authenticated. Samba is running but these ports are closed :
netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NETBIOS session service
2018 Jan 08
1
Switching from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ
On 1/2/2018 4:05 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:52:57 -0500
> lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/2/2018 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:23:18 -0500
>>> lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Actually it looks as if Bind isn't running.
2014 Feb 14
3
smbclient broken after update
Since a bit more than a year I run a Samba4 AD server on a Debian
testing box. During that period I did update and dist-update the
box about twice a week, and also did update and recompile Sambe,
i.e. Samba and Debian Jessie are on their latest stage. I use Bind
9.9.3 as name server, which works absolutely smooth.
But two days ago something got broken, and I am totally clueless,
what went
2020 Jun 08
2
Samba AD-DC on FreeBSD-12.1 Jail
I decided to scrap everything and restart from the very beginning.
I created a new jail.
I installed samba410 samba-nsupdate py37-dnspython as these are current.
I provisioned a domain:
samba-tool domain provision --adminpass=INstall166 --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL
--dnspass=INstall166 --domain=BROCKLEY --host-name=SMB4-1
--host-ip=192.168.8.166 --option="bind interfaces only=yes"
2018 Jan 02
4
Switching from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ
On 1/2/2018 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:23:18 -0500
> lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Actually it looks as if Bind isn't running. Though I could've sworn
>> it did at one point.
>>
>> service bind9 restart
>> * Stopping domain name service... bind9
>> rndc: connect
2018 Dec 31
3
AD bind DNS broken after 4.7.3 -> 4.9.2 upgrade
Can you try to upgrade to any 4.8 version then to 4.9.4?
might work, atleast my guess this will have a better chance get passed this bug.
Greetz,
Louis
> Op 31 dec. 2018 om 18:35 heeft Král Gergely via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
> 2018-12-31 17:29 id??pontban Rowland Penny via samba ezt írta:
>
>>>
>>
>> OK,
2013 May 29
1
Error Message while joining a Domain as a DC
I joined an existing domain according to:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC
My var/log.samba shows the following error message ... and
unfortunately ... I have no idea what that means.
[2013/05/29 20:48:00, 0]
../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: tkey query failed: GSSAPI
error: Major = Unspecified
2016 Sep 21
2
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 9/18/2016 6:23 PM, Garming Sam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the unsorted attributeID values errors, can you first try:
>
> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid'
>
> There's too much going on, and it does look like it might be bailing
> out. Running it with 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' should fix those
> first
2019 Jan 02
2
AD bind DNS broken after 4.7.3 -> 4.9.2 upgrade
On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:09:44 +0100
Král Gergely via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> 2018-12-31 20:50 időpontban L.P.H. van Belle via samba ezt írta:
> > Can you try to upgrade to any 4.8 version then to 4.9.4?
> > might work, atleast my guess this will have a better chance get
> > passed this bug.
> >
>
> I can confirm that an upgrade to 4.7.3 to
2018 Mar 16
2
samba 4.7->4.8 in place upgrade
On 3/16/2018 10:07 AM, barış tombul via samba wrote:
> same problem.
> Never pass the 4.8 version.
>
> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix
> Unable to determine the DomainSID, can not enforce uniqueness constraint on
> local domainSIDs
>
> Searching for dsServiceName in rootDSE failed: operations error at
> ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/rootdse.c:516
> Failed
2016 Mar 22
2
Samba4 - Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm
Good afternoon,
I have installed a fileserver with samba4 environment.
This is configured to works as AD-DC even if I only use it as a
fileserver (at the moment).
All seems to works fine but, every 10 minutes, the log print these messages:
Mar 22 11:53:17 fileserver samba[1946]: [2016/03/22 11:53:17.557554, 0]
../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:324(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
Mar 22 11:53:17 fileserver
2024 Jun 08
1
Fwd: Two DNS issues with samba
Hi,
I have two problems with my 2 Samba AD-DC. I don't know if the two problems
are related.
Both domain controllers show the same error pattern for problem 1.The
second problem only occurs with the second domain controller.
The domain itself seems to work and be in order.
Does someone know where this comes from and how to solve it?
## Issue 1 ##
By doing my random log checking, I saw the