similar to: How Badlock Was Discovered and Fixed

Am 22.02.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 20:05 +0000, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much >> underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be >> made? >> >> After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a >> Samba Active Directory

Hi, We support an older version SMB1 server (propietary implementation) which does not support extended security . Mapping a share from that server, using smbclient, was working before applying badlock patches (to the smbclient) , with default settings in smb.conf. However, after applying badlock patches, smbclient fails to map with default settings. When I set the option : "client ntlmv2

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 19:30:42 +0100 Miguel Medalha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Your problem probably comes from using the AD DC as a file server. > The file server should be separated, as recommended by the Samba > team. I get close to wire speed on dedicated member servers. > > With version 4.4.2, changes in behaviour for the "server signing" and

Hi Rowland The 4.5.10 was the newest of 4.5x series on that time, but the 4.5x series is still supported isn't it ? What shares are configured unproperly or like old samba way ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 3:50:56 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] SMB

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================================================= "There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works." Alan J. Perlis ================================================================= Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest bugfix release release of the Samba 3.3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================================================= "There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works." Alan J. Perlis ================================================================= Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest bugfix release release of the Samba 3.3

Hello again, I am using samba 3.5.6. I have another though maybe this problem occurs due to my OpenLDAP service? My /etc/openldap/slapd.conf is using: [...] access to dn.base="" by * read access to dn.base="cn=Subschema" by * read access to attrs=userPassword,userPKCS12 by self write by * auth access to attrs=shadowLastChange by self

Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? Thanks, Sam

Do you know why Red Hat updated libtdb as part of their remediation for Badlock on Samba4? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Sam Gardner wrote: > > Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba > 3.x > > imply an

Dear all, I am trying to install Samba 3.0.30 on a new Centos 5 machine and I am getting following error. Samba has been downloaded form setnet. Could some please let me know how to fix this? rpmdb: Program version 4.3 doesn't match environment version error: db4 error(-30974) from dbenv->open: DB_VERSION_MISMATCH: Database environment version mismatch warning: cannot open Solve

Hi, Microsoft some time ago introduced Hardened UNC Paths, and in April published the Badlock security fixes, which seem to be related to that. Samba at the same time published versions 4.4.1 (and 4.4.2). Even after reading the release notes of Samba 4.4.1 several times, I still do not know whether I must manually adjust smb.conf to be protected from these vulnerabilities. What I do know is

================================================================ "Your background and environment is with you for life. No question about that." Sean Connery ================================================================ Release Announcements ===================== This is a maintenance release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major enhancements in 3.2.12 include: o

================================================================ "Your background and environment is with you for life. No question about that." Sean Connery ================================================================ Release Announcements ===================== This is a maintenance release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major enhancements in 3.2.12 include: o

>* Am 13.04.2016 um 07:51 schrieb Mogens Kjaer <mk at lemo.dk <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>>: *> >* Hello, *> >* I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users with samba running as an NT-like PDC. *> >* After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.), nobody can log in. *> >* They all get the

Hai Marcio, > Can I remove Unix Attributes of the Administrator user and > other administrator groups (set up NIS Domain to "none") ? Yes, GID on Domain Admins, is not a problem, but UID on Administrator is a big problem. So yes, user Administrator remove all unix tab settings. ( Dont forget to run : net cache flush ) And dubble check with : id Administrator. A tip. For

I will follow this, I have the same issue, I had to downgrade...centos 5.11 latest. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Johan GLENAC <johan.glenac at ac-guyane.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > Due to "Red Hat Vulnerability Response: BADLOCK", an automatic samba > package RHEL5 update was apply on our system. > This broke "The trust relationship between this workstation and

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Sam Gardner wrote: > Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x > imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? > > If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? There were no tdb vulnerabilities in the badlock code release.

Hi, Samba has released patch for CVE-2016-2118 from 3.6.x release onwards. We use samba 3.0.35 in our product. Is there any patch available for 3.0.35? -- Regards Madhu

On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 19:37 +0200, Stefan Kania wrote: > Hello everybody, > > since the patch for all the badlock bugs it is not possible to access > a Samba 4 ADDC-database with ldb-tools. Everytime I try it, I get the > following error: ... > When I add: > ---------------------- > tls verify peer = no_check > ---------------------- > to smb.conf I will get the

Hi, Due to "Red Hat Vulnerability Response: BADLOCK", an automatic samba package RHEL5 update was apply on our system. This broke "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed" (error message logon client) in my environnement production. So, I use now 3.6.23-12.el5_11, I see they are new directive for smb.conf and some others more restrict