similar to: Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not

Hello. Anyone else experiencing Problems with this update ? We do have W2k AD. And Samba Member-Server. This is done via Winbind without using Kerberos. After installing the Update to our AD-Servers. It seems that winbind lost its connectivity. wbinfo -t worked. wbinfo -u showed errors. After removing the update from all our servers, winbind works again. Should I move our configuration to

All, After upgrading to samba 3.0.30 on gentoo amd64 because of my recent best friend CVE-2008-1105 My winbind daemon is 'hanging up', and refusing to respond to pings after a few minutes of activity. Wbinfo -u, getent passwd all work successfully, then after a bit wbinfo -p just tells me winbind dies. I have 3.0.30/winbind on another machine, also amd64 that is working.... So

Hello list, a samba server serves the home directories for about 100 Windows 2000 clients. We had samba 3.0.7 (on debian woody) installed, and upgraded to 3.0.14a (we used the sernet packages on debian sarge). Now access to files from windows 2000 clients is extremely slow, especially on .exe files. Simply selecting a exe file from windows explorer may freeze it for 2-10 seconds. Other file

Hello, Samba Gurus ..... I have a Samba server running on a pair of SUN servers (server-a and server-b). The samba shares are NFS mounted from a third SUN server (server-c). I installed Samba 2.2.7a on the paired SUN servers under /usr/local/samba (Samba 2.2.7a is locally installed on server-a and server-b, since /usr/local/samba is local on the rootdisk.) The failover environment works like

On 04/04/15 03:29, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Rowland Penny! > >>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>>>>>>>> classic >>>>>>>>>> migration. >>>>>>>>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that.

> On 15/04/16 10:33, Oktay Akbal wrote: > > [global] > > workgroup = DOMAIN > > realm = DOMAIN.DE > > netbios name = HOST > > server string = HOST > > security = ADS > > encrypt passwords = Yes > > map to guest = Bad User > > password server = * > > log

On 03/04/15 21:29, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Rowland Penny! > >>>>>>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>>>>>> classic >>>>>>>> migration. >>>>>>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that. >>>>>>>> I've edited the

Hi. Does winbind has limitations with lots of users in domain? I'm compiled samba 4.3.1 and created 40 users, so winbind and getent works fine, but when created 26.000 users and "wbinfo -u" doesn't show users. On DC Member Server, "wbinfo -u" and "getent passwd" doesn't show users to. On log.wb-CORP appears: [2016/02/23 18:46:46.319393, 1]

I have upgraded to version 3.0.27a on ubuntu 7.10 server and now the getent command wont display the active directory users, but wbinfo will. It worked fine with 3.0.26a and I have not changed my configuration. I do however have this in my winbind log: [2007/12/04 13:39:01, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:request_len_recv(544) request_len_recv: Invalid request size received: 2084 (expected

Greetings, Rowland Penny! >> # cat /etc/resolv.conf >> nameserver 192.168.17.4 >> search ads.ccenter.lan >> >> # host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.ads.ccenter.lan. >> _ldap._tcp.ads.ccenter.lan has SRV record 0 100 389 dc1.ads.ccenter.lan. >> >> # nslookup dc1 >> Server: 192.168.17.4 >> Address: 192.168.17.4#53 >> >>

Hi, All! I Have Samba (3.5.6) domain witch have trust relations with ADS (Named TEST) Win2008 (2008 domain mode) On PDC all working very good. I have also Domain Member server in my samba Domain. When i trying type wbinfo -u, or getent passwd on samba PDC (Named BINKLG) I see all, including ADS users. When I trying do it on Domain Member Server I don't see users from ADS Is it possible to

On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Oktay Akbal wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Hsu, Cheng (Consultant) wrote: > > > But my experiment shows that I MUST > explicitly join the > > NT domain > > in order for everything to work. > > Just a guess: Make sure that the server do not only have the same > smb.conf, but also the same SID (MACHINE.SID or whatever > setup of samba

On 16/04/16 21:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > New update. > > > > I now have done about 6 machines. > > 2 with samba 4.2.10 work fine, 2 not. > > 1 with samba 4.3.7 works fine, 1 not. > > > > I saw Jelmer updated the samba to 4.3.8 in sid, so i recompiled these to jessie. > > I upgraded the 4.3.7 to 4.3.8 Hi Louis, debian 4.2.10 is the same as

On 03/04/15 19:33, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Rowland Penny! > >>>>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>>>> classic >>>>>> migration. >>>>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that. >>>>>> I've edited the smb.conf and nsswitch.conf as suggested in

Greetings, Rowland Penny! >>>>>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>>>>> classic >>>>>>> migration. >>>>>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that. >>>>>>> I've edited the smb.conf and nsswitch.conf as suggested in Wiki article,

Hi, I have Samba 3.0.21b running on Solaris 10 with ADS authentication. I get the following in log.winbindd when I do "getent passwd" but wbinfo -u lists all the users. Does anyone know why and how to fix it? Thanks, Vahid. [2006/02/04 13:37:02, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c:query_user_list(234) ads query_user_list gave 9926 entries [2006/02/04 13:37:04, 3]

On 04/04/15 18:28, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Rowland Penny! > >>> # cat /etc/resolv.conf >>> nameserver 192.168.17.4 >>> search ads.ccenter.lan >>> >>> # host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.ads.ccenter.lan. >>> _ldap._tcp.ads.ccenter.lan has SRV record 0 100 389 dc1.ads.ccenter.lan. >>> >>> # nslookup dc1 >>> Server:

Greetings, Rowland Penny! >>>>>>>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>>>>>>> classic >>>>>>>>> migration. >>>>>>>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that. >>>>>>>>> I've edited the smb.conf and nsswitch.conf as

Dear samba list, For some time we've had servers connecting to a w2k3 r2 server via ADS setup. Wins was working fine and users were able to authenticate. Recently we've added a GFS like system. This required getting the UID/GID's unified. Suggestions were made on the samba IRC channel to install SFU on the PDC. I'm receiving some very strange output. Usernames/pwd have

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Robert M. Martel wrote: > I've followed the steps as listed in the manual. Log onto a > windows 2000 client as a user listed as a printer admin. Load the > printer driver and make the changes to reflect installed options on the > printer. Just as listed in section 6.2.2 of the "how-to" manual >