similar to: BADLOCK - samba 3.6.23 and Trust relationship

Hi, Finally, I have launched "yum downgrade samba*" too for best effort. I am waiting for news until my samba 4 migration. AC-GUYANE <mailto:Johan.Glenac at ac-guyane.fr> *Johan GLENAC* *DSI* Administrateur Système, Réseaux et Télécom *TROUBIRAN :* Route de Baduel - BP 6011 97306 Cayenne *Tél. :* +594 (0) 594 27 22 08 *Fax :* +594 (0) 594 27 22 20 Rectorat - Académie de la

I will follow this, I have the same issue, I had to downgrade...centos 5.11 latest. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Johan GLENAC <johan.glenac at ac-guyane.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > Due to "Red Hat Vulnerability Response: BADLOCK", an automatic samba > package RHEL5 update was apply on our system. > This broke "The trust relationship between this workstation and

The function tapply is not working in the Windows version of R=20 (Version 0.50 Beta (Sept 29, 1997)) In tapply <- function (x, INDEX, FUN=3DNULL, simplify=3DTRUE, ...)=20 ... The part: if (simplify && all(unlist(lapply(ans, length)) =3D=3D 1)) { ans <- unlist(ans, recursive =3D FALSE) names(ans)<-namelist[[1]] return(ans) } should be replaced by if (simplify

I am having trouble extracting residuals from Major Axis and Standardized Major Axis fits, using the smatr package. I wish to understand the relationship between density of wood in twigs and trunks, and how the slope of their relationship varies among sites, among families, and with tree size. These variance-partitioning desires push the analysis toward a mixed model framework. However,

Hi, I am running Xen 3.0.2 in bridged networking on RHEL4. Everything seems to be working nicely, apart from a worrying issue. I can ping from Dom0 -> DomUs okay. I can ping from DomUs -> Dom0 okay. HOWEVER. I cannot ping DomU -> DomU. --- # ping xxx.xxx.xxx.248 Do you want to ping broadcast? Then -b --- Even when I try with the -b switch, I get no joy. Thoughts? TIA! Y.

On my recently acquired Core2Duo I''ve installed debian etch amd64, Then I''ve pulled the linux-source from since I need newer raid and netcard drivers: http://dk.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux-source-2.6.22/linux-source-2.6.22_2.6.22.orig.tar.gz http://dk.archive.ubuntu.com/pub/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux-source-2.6.22/linux-source-2.6.22_2.6.22-14.46.diff.gz

Hi Folks, XEN seems to me to be the ideal partner to create a complete DMZ with firewall, router, "Bastios Host(s)" etc within a single PC. So far, I haven''t found any cookbook or how to (at least for the beginning). Anyone knows of such thing? Regards Falko _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Please tell me if I am wrong : Xen needs LVM to perform domU snapshots and snapshots must be performed by dom0. By the way, a LVM volume group should not be used by more that one kernel at the same time. So if we use a SAN storage, one volume group should be activated on only one server and deactivated on the others. But if we do that, it should not be possible to perform live migration of

Can anybody tell me if it makes a difference if domU''s have separate LVM volume groups? For instance, the Xen User Manual ( http://tx.downloads.xensource.com/downloads/docs/user/#SECTION03330000000000000000) says, when setting up a domU''s disks with LVM, to do a vgcreate vg /dev/sda10 Should each domU have it''s own volume group, or can all the domU''s share

I'd like to use the VoIP service from Free with Asterisk, but am having a couple of problems. Here are some details: ADSL from Free T?l?com comes bundled with VoIP and TV services. Most users access the VoIP via the supplied Freebox, which is an integrated DSL modem, router, ATA, and media player. It is of course possible to connect the Freebox to Asterisk via an X100P or other FXO

Hello, Is it possible to add some static entries to the WINS database? We would like to add a few (logon-)server entries to it, when wins starts up. Why? We have several Samba servers who act as logon server on different subnets for different domains. Each logon server also acts as a local WINS server. It doesn't seem possible, not even with the options 'remote announce' or

Hello, I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users with samba running as an NT-like PDC. After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.), nobody can log in. They all get the "Trust relationship failed" error message. If I downgrade: yum downgrade samba-common samba-winbind samba-winbind-clients samba-client samba samba-doc

Did you update your Windows clients? On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Mogens Kjaer <mk at lemo.dk> wrote: > Hello, > > I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users > with samba running as an NT-like PDC. > > After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.), nobody can > log in. > > They all get the "Trust

>* Am 13.04.2016 um 07:51 schrieb Mogens Kjaer <mk at lemo.dk <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>>: *> >* Hello, *> >* I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users with samba running as an NT-like PDC. *> >* After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.), nobody can log in. *> >* They all get the

FYI: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199013.html On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bill Baird <bill.baird at phoenixmi.com> wrote: > I'm seeing the exact same behavior in my environment (NT4 PDC, not AD). I > had to downgrade samba get systems working again. > > The full error message is: > > "The trust relationship between this workstation and

Just to follow up, the fix for us was to add "client ipc signing = auto" to our smb.conf configuration file. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Bill Baird <bill.baird at phoenixmi.com> wrote: > FYI: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199013.html > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bill Baird <bill.baird at phoenixmi.com> > wrote: > >>

Another follow up. I have a Centos 6 server running as a Samba NT4/PDC Domain controller and have seen the regression with 3.6.23-30 release. Client is a Windows 2008R2 server. Workaround with smb.conf parameters given here seems to work but it works only for accounts already existing in the domain. New accounts get a "There are currently no logon servers available to service the

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 04:40:50AM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I just read the article. Thank you for your effort, Jeremy, as well as to all the Samba team members involved in this gigantic work! In particular Metze, Guenther, Andreas, Alexander and the SetNet, Red Hat and SUSE Teams deserve all of the credit.

Hi, Samba has released patch for CVE-2016-2118 from 3.6.x release onwards. We use samba 3.0.35 in our product. Is there any patch available for 3.0.35? -- Regards Madhu

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Sam Gardner wrote: > Does mitigation of the so-called BADLOCK CVE (CVE-2016-2118) for Samba 3.x > imply an upgrade to a non-vulnerable version of the tdb library? > > If so, can someone point me to any documentation on the tdb vulnerability? There were no tdb vulnerabilities in the badlock code release.