similar to: [Half OT?] Waiting for completion of Startupscript before logon

Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> schrieb: > Can you be a bit more specific, it sounds like you mean users can logon > somewhere even though Samba isn't running, or do you mean that windows > users are not running a logon script when they log in. No, of course Samba runs... I mean, Windows boots and starts a Startup-Script (or will shutdown and call a Shutdown-Script).

On 12/04/16 15:41, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Hi list! > > I'm pretty sure, that this topic is at least half OT, but I really > don't know where otherwise I can ask... > > So, I got my Network with Samba 4.1.6 as AD-Controller to work. > I configured Startup-, Shutdown- and Logon-Scripts and they run well. > > The only problem is, that the user can logon where

Hi list! I have a very strange problem... I configured Samba 4.1.6 on a Ubuntu 14.04 Server to act as AD-Controller. It works without any problem. Then I wanted to join the AD two other Servers with Ubuntu 14.04 and Samba 4.1.6. The first works without any problem, the second (same configuration!) not... Here my smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CCH realm =

Hi list! I have an Ubuntu 14.04 Server with Samba 4.1.6 acting as Active Directory controller. I worked 'till today, now I tried to join a new PC to the domain and it does not work... Problems: start and shutdown scripts are NOT called at all, logon scripts are called on the first PC, but not in the new one. The new PC did not receive the policies and did not mount the shares. gpupdate

Hi! I have a little problem with the given phone... Do someone know it? My problem is that I'd like to display the name of the caller (if it is saved in the address book, of course), but it always display just the number... Thanks Luca Bertoncello (lucabert at lucabert.de)

Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: Hi Remko, > Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in > someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the > info@ credentials with the other > people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. That is self-evident and it is not a problem. I can't understand what you

Hi list! I deleted completely Samba on my Server and reinstalled it again. Now it seems to work, but I have a little problem: if I try to access the home directory of a user and write something, the owner of the created directory/file is a UID, but not the user itself... Could someone help me? This is the definition of the share in my smb.conf: [homes] comment = Home Directories

Patrick Laimbock <patrick at laimbock.com> schrieb: > On 12/30/15 12:24, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > > Ishfaq Malik <ish at pack-net.co.uk> schrieb: > > > >> Do you have a link to the user guide for your exact phone model? > > > > Unfortunately not... > > I have a Thomson ST2022, but I can just find in Internet manual for the > > ST2030...

Ashwin Surendran <Ashwin.Surendran at now-health.com> schrieb: > What settings have you got for directmedia? > > Could you try > > nat=force_rport,comedia > directmedia=no Tried. Peer always unreachable, call not possible... :( Other idea? Thanks Luca Bertoncello (lucabert at lucabert.de)

Hi again! I always try to get my mobile phone work with my Asterisk. I tried to install Asterisk on my PC (with public IP), but it has problems, too... I think, my UMTS-Provider doesn't want to connect to dynamic IP or my DSL-Provider does not want it, too, since I have no problem to connect and get a very good audio quality if I connect to other SIP-Provider or to an Asterisk (SAME

Zitat von Luca Bertoncello <lucabert at lucabert.de>: > I removed the double browseable, but the situation didn't change... > > But I have notice something stranger: the problem just happen with two users > in the "Domain Admins"-group. > With another user, not in this group, new created files and directories have > the right owner... Well, I noticed right

Hi again I'm trying to authenticate a user against an LDAP Server (well, our AD, but it can LDAP). This is my configuration: hosts = my.server.local auth_bind = yes ldap_version = 3 base = CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=company,DC=local scope = subtree user_attrs = \ =home=/home/imapproxy/%u, \ =mail=maildir:/home/imapproxy/%u pass_attrs = uid=%u, userPassword=%w

Hi again! About my previous E-Mail... I though about it and I think, that maybe I'm just very stupid... Since I called an INTERNAL number, Asterisk tried to call it. I tried right now to call an EXTERNAL number (using my context [myproxy]) and the behavior is NOT the same... Not 100% correct, but it tries the right way... Now my problem is to check in my dialplan if the peer, that

Zitat von Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com>: > If you the c option in the dial command it will send answered > else where sip message to the phone and most ip phones understand that > The cell will always display a missed call? I'm very sorry, but I can't understand what you mean... Could you explain, maybe with an example? Thanks Luca Bertoncello (lucabert at

Hi! I have a Asterisk installation to manage my phones at home (provider is Deutsche Telekom). It works, but very often the voice is "broken"... Yesterday during a call it was very difficult to understand what my partner sayd... It can NOT be a problem of other downloads/uploads, since in that moment there were no ones... I already had the problem in the past, solved it enabling the

Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> schrieb: > Hmm, not what I thought, but if that is the case, two more questions: > > Why are you using the depreciated ntvfs ? So I found in an HowTo (I don't have the address anymore...) > If you joined as a DC, why do you have this in smb.conf: server role = > MEMBER SERVER What have I to use? Thanks Luca Bertoncello (lucabert

Zitat von A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk>: > On Monday 06 Jul 2015, Luca Bertoncello wrote: >> Well, but for voice quality, which codec is better? >> alaw or gsm? > > A-law is better for voice quality (sorry, thought my original > explanation was > obvious). But note that if the destination is a mobile phone, GSM will be > used anyway, at

Am 23.06.2020 08:43, schrieb Luca Bertoncello: And another thing, I discovered right now... > Could you suggest me something to restrict the problem? > Currently, I think the problem can be: > > 1) on Asterisk > 2) on my Gateway/Firewall A couple of years ago I added this entry in my firewall: /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS

Am 23.06.2020 09:28, schrieb Marek Greško: Hi > if you need clampmss then it is highly probable there is a PMTU > discovery problem. The clampmss does not work for UDP. Is there a way to check if I have this problem? > I probably counted the size incorrectly. So you are able to ping with > size 1464 and not with 1466. How about trying same ping sizes from the > internet towards

Hi list! I configured Asterisk to forward the incoming call for a number to both phones. I wrote that: exten => _00493512222222,n,Dial(SIP/00493512222222&SIP/00493511111111,,R) of course it works... Now the problem is, that when a phone get the call, on the other phone I get "1 missed call"... Is it possible to avoid that and signaling the other phone, that the call was