similar to: Filserver in Domain-trusts

Hi All, Here's an interesting one... I need to be able to connect smbclient on a linux machine to a dos based machine, which is running MSCLIENT and the WG1049 patch. I can browse to the machine and see all the files from Network Neighbourhood in Windows, but if I try and go in with: smbclient \\GAUGE1\C, or even just smbclient -L GAUGE1 all I get is: Added interface ip=10.0.1.1

Hi Karthik and Ben, I'll try and reply to you inline. On 21 December 2017 at 07:18, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com> wrote: > Hey, > > Can you give us the volume info output for this volume? # gluster volume info virt_images Volume Name: virt_images Type: Replicate Volume ID: 9f3c8273-4d9d-4af2-a4e7-4cb4a51e3594 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 2 Number of Bricks:

Hi Henrik, Thanks for providing the required outputs. See my replies inline. On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Henrik Juul Pedersen <hjp at liab.dk> wrote: > Hi Karthik and Ben, > > I'll try and reply to you inline. > > On 21 December 2017 at 07:18, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com> > wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Can you give us the

Hey, Can you give us the volume info output for this volume? Why are you not able to get the xattrs from arbiter brick? It is the same way as you do it on data bricks. The changelog xattrs are named trusted.afr.virt_images-client-{1,2,3} in the getxattr outputs you have provided. Did you do a remove-brick and add-brick any time? Otherwise it will be trusted.afr.virt_images-client-{0,1,2} usually.

On 11/02/2020 15:19, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote: > Hi Rowland > > My two DC are Samba 4 on Debian. I? haven't Windows DC. > > >Hi Marcio, the ACLs should be copied, so I think it is likely to be > a?permissions problem, does the user who is running robocopy have > the?SeDiskOperatorPrivilege on the computer you are copying to ? > > I'm running robocopy with

Hi Karthik, Thanks for the info. Maybe the documentation should be updated to explain the different AFR versions, I know I was confused. Also, when looking at the changelogs from my three bricks before fixing: Brick 1: trusted.afr.virt_images-client-1=0x000002280000000000000000 trusted.afr.virt_images-client-3=0x000000000000000000000000 Brick 2:

Hey Henrik, Good to know that the issue got resolved. I will try to answer some of the questions you have. - The time taken to heal the file depends on its size. That's why you were seeing some delay in getting everything back to normal in the heal info output. - You did not hit the split-brain situation. In split-brain all the bricks will be blaming the other bricks. But in your case the

Hi, >||||||Do not set ANY additional share parameters, such as force user or >valid users. Adding them to the share definition can prevent you from >configuring or using the share. OK, sorry. Now is working properly. I'm copying the Windows files to Samba4 and I'm not able to copy the NTFS security information. In the logs it states that the destination is not an NTFS system.

I run dovecot --version 2.3.10.1 (a3d0e1171) postconf mail_version mail_version = 3.5.7 with three valid accounts on the server, user1 at example1.net user2 at example2.net admin at mx.example.com I can send/receive from each -- both to/from external addresses, as well as between one another. E.g., on mail sent to user2 at example2.net -> admin at mx.example.com logs of the

Hello everybody and Timo. I have the next problem. With LDAP tree like ou=mail | - dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box1 at example1.com,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box2 at example1.com,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail ? | - dc=example2.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box1 at example2.com,dc=example2.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box2 at example2.com,dc=example2.com,ou=Mail ? and settings in dovecot

This reverts commit 25206df20275aeff346d9b86adf5e9be99cc9e43. An upcoming patch wants to ensure no leaked fds from the server to a child process. POSIX has required O_CLOEXEC since 2008, and although current POSIX doesn't yet specify full atomic interfaces everywhere such as SOCK_CLOEXEC, it does have an open bug since 2014 [1] recommending the full set of interfaces that will be mandatory

I hav a problem porting my ACLS from my old filserver to a new one... My old Fileserver: I have my shares on a partition supporting acls with ext3 /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) My new Fileserver: /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext4 (rw,acl,user_xattr) Now I copied all my shares to the new Fileserver with rsync and backed up my acls with: getfacl -R

This reverts commit 25206df20275aeff346d9b86adf5e9be99cc9e43, and temporarily breaks compilation on Haiku which has O_CLOEXEC but lacks SOCK_CLOEXEC [1]. An upcoming patch wants to ensure no leaked fds from the server to a child process. POSIX has required O_CLOEXEC since 2008, and that is long enough that we should start blindly relying on it. Meanwhile, POSIX doesn't yet specify full

On 16/05/2019 09:00, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, > listing all GPOs is working: > ------------------ > > root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall > GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > display name : Default Domain Policy > path : >

Introduce a new helper function to resolve a path name, calling nbdkit_error on failure: other than doing what nbdkit_absolute_path does, it also checks that the file exists (and thus avoids errors later on). To help distinguish it from nbdkit_absolute_path, improve the documentation of the latter. Apply it where an existing path is required, both in nbdkit itself and in plugins. Related to:

Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- align/Makefile.am | 2 +- builder/Makefile.am | 2 +- builder/website/Makefile.am | 2 +- cat/Makefile.am | 4 ++-- common-rules.mk | 8 ++++---- customize/Makefile.am | 2 +- df/Makefile.am | 4 ++-- diff/Makefile.am | 2 +-

Introduce a new helper function to resolve a path name, calling nbdkit_error on failure: other than doing what nbdkit_absolute_path does, it also checks that the file exist (and thus avoid errors later on). Apply it where an existing path is required, both in nbdkit itself and in plugins. Related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527334 --- docs/nbdkit-plugin.pod | 13

Hai Stefan, What is the samba version your running now? Im now at 4.10.3 with my DC's and the command : samba-tool gpo list username Then it does show the GPO's for the user. If you on 4.10, check if these are installed : ii python3 3.5.3-1 amd64 interactive high-level object-oriented language (default python3 version) ii

I use Redhat Linux 9, SWAT version 2.2.7a-8.9.0 , and Samba version 2.2.7a-8.9.0. I have one Windows 2000 and one XP system that use the linuxbox as a filserver. There are various access problems with the Windows machines getting access to the Samba shares. The Windows2000 machine accesses the Linux shares fine (requiring authentication for each share and giving access rights based on the local

Hi all, Im having a hard time figuring whats wrong with my Samba-ldap setup. I hope somebody may point out the error. I've set it up according to John H. Terpstra's excellent "Samba 3 by example". This book is also availible from samba.org, and chapter I'm referencing is this: http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/happy.html I followed the book character by