similar to: static vs shared modules build

Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >> >> $ rm test.txt >> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >> >> cannot remove: >> OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan >> OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite >> OS X 10.9.5

samba-4.2.9-0.fc22.x86_64 with the configuration below a user from a up-to-date Apple client copies a folder with some images (from the share itself) to a different subfolder * he sees the folder * it appears empty in finder - in fact it is not empty * he can not delete it * he can rename it * a different user from a Apple clients sees the files * remove the "vfs objects" line and

On 26/12/15 17:33, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: >> On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. >>> >>> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. >>> >>> smb.conf: >>> path = /export/test1/ >>>

Hi all, I'm trying to upgrade samba from 4.5 to 4.8 and it no longer starts. This is using the Debian Jessie (4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u2) and Debian testing (4.8.2+dfsg-1) packages. Below are a log file from the non-starting server, and testparm on the working 4.5, and again on the non-working 4.8. I do so an ERROR in the the testparm for 4.8: idmap range not specified for domain

Hi, i'm running Samba 4.2.1 compiled from source on an Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS Server. ACL/XATTR is active and working. I tried to activate the vfs_fruite module and added the sample code: vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:resource = file fruit:metadata = netatalk fruit:locking = netatalk fruit:encoding = native to the share. In addition i tried the following share definition: vfs

I must reply to my own post. Changing the fruit:locking to "none" results in a working share. Netatalk 3.1.6 is installed and from the information of the changelog Netatalk 3.1.7 doesn't change anything to the file locking (except if you're using Solaris). Am 25. April 2015 bei 12:16:20, Christian Kovacic, MA (chris.k at gmx.at) schrieb: Hi, i'm running Samba 4.2.1

Hi all, We use the vfs_fruit module and lately we have experienced that random files copied with Finder are being grayed out. We think this is probably due to the extended attribute "user.DosStream.AFP_AfpInfo:$DATA" not being updated/removed after the file is copied. If we manually remove the xattr in question with the command setfattr -d 'user.DosStream.AFP_AfpInfo:$DATA', the

On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > Hi, > I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > > The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > > smb.conf: > path = /export/test1/ > writable = yes > vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr > fruit:locking = netatalk > fruit:encoding = native > streams_xattr:prefix = user.

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:33:10AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > > On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > >> > >> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > >> > >> smb.conf: > >> path =

Hi, I previously had an issue that was fixed by implementing vfs_fruit. For reference: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199583.html <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199583.html> I’m running Samba 4.2.11 on FreeBSD 10.0 release and our shares are on ZFS. Our macs are on OS X 10.11.4. What I had previously was this: vfs objects = zfsacl Which I then

> Please keep the wiki page simple. Anyone who wants to get > down and dirty > has to read man vfs_fruit and understand what the options are > really for > and he probably also has to understand the code. Its not about getting down and dirty, but about gettings a simple setup for samba version X.YY for users that are more beginners. And exactly my point a beginner, will fail,

Hi. I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. The character ":" in EA name is wrong. The EAs are not seen from clients. smb.conf: [test2] path = /export/test2 writable = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:locking =

In case of FreeBSD, the name of the extended attribute is wrong. % lsextattr user ICONandEA.txt ICONandEA.txt netatalk.Metadata com.apple.TextEncoding com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment "netatalk.Metadata" is incompatible to Netatalk. The first atom "org." is removed. source3/include/smb.h: /* Prefix for DosStreams in the vfs_streams_xattr module */ #define

I?m not sure if this is related, but there was a regression a while back in handling resource forks in folder icons. It was supposed to be fixed in 4.10.13 but I don?t think it quite works yet and I haven?t had the time to test it further yet. -Perttu > On 30 May 2020, at 21.00, Martin Steiner / 3MF GmbH via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I changed the configuration

After upgrading to macOS 10.15 I've hit an issue where if the share's connection is interrupted for long enough (e.g. because the server is rebooted) then the client Mac's Finder becomes stuck and?puts up a message 'The operation can?t be completed because the original item for ?<share>? can?t be found. Sometimes restarting Finder helps, sometimes restarting sharingd helps

Hi HAT! Nice to meet you over here... ;) On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:30:45PM +0900, HAT wrote: > Hi. > I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. > I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with > Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. > The character ":" in EA name is wrong. > The EAs are not seen from clients. >

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 00:15:32 +0200 Jonathan Szalavecz <john_johnk at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thank you for your feedback, and I apologize for misunderstanding > your question earlier. Here?s the output of my command: > > ```bash > |john_johnk at raspberrypi: $ df -T /mnt/shared/ Filesystem Type > 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 ext4

I changed the configuration and raised the log level, in my opion samba tries to access the non existent double files. Samba is now probably writing the data in a netatalk compliant way in the extended attributes of the file but is not reading it. new configuration: [Global] min protocol = SMB2 vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:metadata = stream fruit:resource = stream fruit:encoding

I thought with the ACL it would be easier but it is the same nightmare :-( john_johnk at raspberrypi:~ $ getfacl /mnt/shared/partage_de_fichiers getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: mnt/shared/partage_de_fichiers # owner: john_johnk # group: sharedaccess # flags: -s- user::rwx group::rwx other::--- default:user::rw- default:group::rw-

Am 13.05.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Reindl Harald via samba: > since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and > so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to > go get rid of netatalk these days? > > is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble > extended attributes which are *not* compatible