similar to: 'Smb' server service is reason of panic of Samba 436 smbd daemon.

Yes, exactly. Also, bind9 is used. Such behavior I saw at 436 at Ubuntu 14.04 x64. There was not so with 434 at Ubuntu 14.04 x32. Unfortunatelly, I didn' t understand what you said in 2nd part of phrase. I understand that if remove either some services or all from the line, it will turn it off. But I suppose, that 'smb' additionally tries to turn on smb which has been already on and

Hello. At a customer's site I had: _ Windows 2008 DC; _ Samba 4.8 fileserver on FreeBSD 11.3/amd64 on UFS; _ several Windows and Mac clients. Recently, having to move to Samba 4.10, I decided to bring up a new fileserver in a jail (and let the base 4.8 one die after transferring all shares). I have no problems with Windows clients, but several strange things are happening with Macs.

Hello ! I decided to upgrade my fileservers from stretch/samba 4.9 to buster/samba 4.11 I just realized that smbd is not working anymore :-/ If someone has an idea It would be amazing... as an idiot, I upgraded my 20 servers.... without snapshot.... Thank you so much Here's some logs : root at ef113:~# tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd #1

Can someone point me at how the machine account plays into permitting access here? [it] path = /mnt/data/samba/data/it valid users = CUSTOMER\sgw CUSTOMER\fhäu @CUSTOMER\edv read only = No browseable = No A user out of the group "edv" uses the PC "p10013". Sometimes he gets access, sometimes not. Logs show: (a) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [P10013$]

Am 2015-12-29 um 18:59 schrieb Rowland penny: > NO! This will give you precisely 0 users > > config * == the range the 'builtin' users will be mapped to. > config customer == the range for all the domain users that have a > uidNumber attribute. If a user doesn't have a uidNumber attribute > containing a number inside the range set in smb.conf (in your case >

Hello alAl, after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs from the crash see here: .0.31:445] Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: [2020/04/16 13:36:47.546559, 0] ../../source3/lib/util.c:830(smb_panic_s3) Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: PANIC (pid 6263): vfs_full_audit.c: name table

Le 25/11/2019 ? 09:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba a ?crit?: > I tested Friday also with a W7 pc. > Not working, im try to see what i can do today on this problem. > > Greetz, > > Louis Hi Louis, Thanks for your help. I'm still investigating on it, but sadly i cannot upgrade to 4.11 as those servers cannot reach external repositories for security reasons (those servers

Dear all, since a few days I have a panic error in my logfiles on my second joined DC, Samba version 4.3.4. Can anyone help? PANIC (pid 24120): assert failed: VALID_STAT(smb_fname->st) May 16 10:01:43 s4slave smbd[24120]: [2019/05/16 10:01:43.333006, 0] ../source3/lib/util.c:900(log_stack_trace) May 16 10:01:43 s4slave smbd[24120]: BACKTRACE: 30 stack frames: May 16 10:01:43 s4slave

Hello, I'm having a permissions problem I just can't quite figure out. I can not access any directory that is owned by my userid if the permissions are 700. If I change them to 770, with my default group on the directory, then I can access the directory. This was working fine with Fedora 19 for several years, and it broke when I upgraded to Fedora 22, and still broken with F23. my

On 3/3/2016 2:02 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > It would help if you would provide some information about your system: > - Samba version - smb.conf - "ls -ld" of the directory - etc. Regards, > Marc Hello, version: samba-4.3.4-1.fc23.x86_64 ls -ld: ls -ld /home/blaster drwxrwx--- 76 blaster users 4096 Mar 3 14:15 /home/blaster testparm Load smb config files from

I am trying to install samba 4.5.1 from source, as a domain controller only, under Ubuntu 16.04, with ZFS filesystem (actually inside an lxd container with ZFS backing). Out-of-the-box, samba-tool domain provision does not like the filesystem: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix

Dear List, I updated to samba 4.12.10-SerNet-Debian-9.buster from 4.12.9 and did a gluster volume set volume performance.write-behind off Now I get this in /var/log/syslog and randomly people don't get access to a shae. Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]: [2020/11/09 15:56:14.078120,? 0] ../../source3/lib/popt_common.c:68(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn) Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]:??

I've just upgraded my DM from samba 4.5 to 4.8, using luois repos (also, debian jessie -> stretch). I'm experimenting some troubles on some shares, seems that both guest access and 'machine account' access does not work. The share is rather simple: [wpkg] browseable = No comment = WPKG Automated Software Deploying System force create mode = 0664 force directory mode =

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > There is a limitation for containers regarding xattrs as I understand > it, so you may need to go to a full DC. ...googling around seems to me that are ''old limitation'', now gone. I've also hitted: https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/2015-November/012789.html so seems that

Hi, We are running a samba fileserver, access controlled using posix acl (right 770, with users/groups on the filesystem level. Therefore samba shares look like this: [share] path = /srv/academic read only = no writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 Now certain users complain that they cannot access certain folders, but looking at the folders from the linux fileystem, their

Dear all, I experience now a strange bug with Samba 4.1.11 : When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : logon script = employee.bat But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even "%G.bat", it doesn't work : * logon script = %g.bat * logon script = %G.bat * logon script = "%G.bat" In the logs, there was a message showing that Samba was

Dear Jeremy, thanks for your reply. I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the [global] section? I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again. Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it. Best Bene Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via

On 2017-11-13 12:33, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:05:33 +0100 > Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > >> /etc/hostname:villach-file >> /etc/hosts:# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts >> /etc/hosts:::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback >> /etc/hosts:ff02::1 ip6-allnodes >>

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from