similar to: The sad state of samba 4 adaption for home/small business routers.

Am 11.03.2016 um 18:04 schrieb Andy Walsh: > i would like to inspire a discussion on why samba4 has nearly no adaption on > home/small business routers firmware. > > I recently switched from my old Asus-N16 running tomato to a WRT-1200AC and > was researching potential firmware's that i could run. We have a new > synology disk-station at work that runs Samba 4.x and it works

Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > most likely because there is no serious market > > if i want a NAS i buy a NAS > if i want a router i buy a router > > > no struggle with updates and security holes > no struggle with software versions > no struggle with "i can have this and this but not combined with that" > no struggle

Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: >bloatware means unsecure, uncomfortable webinterfaces with limited >functionality compared what iptables alone offers you with some knowledge > all that embedded crap is for people which needs handholding and have > fun to own a dozen of halfbaken devices instead just one real box It seems you still have some

Jeremy Allison <jra <at> samba.org> writes: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:16:36AM +0000, Andy Walsh wrote: > > > > Also keep in mind that samba3.6 was successfully adopted on any device that > > had a usb2.0 port in the past. So slapping a usbstick/sdcard/hdd on a cheap > > router is already a common scenario. > > Yes, and I'd like to help

Am 11.03.2016 um 20:31 schrieb Andy Walsh: > Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > >> most likely because there is no serious market >> >> if i want a NAS i buy a NAS >> if i want a router i buy a router >> >> no struggle with updates and security holes >> no struggle with software versions >> no struggle with

On 12/03/16 11:16, Andy Walsh wrote: > Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > > >> bloatware means unsecure, uncomfortable webinterfaces with limited >> functionality compared what iptables alone offers you with some knowledge >> all that embedded crap is for people which needs handholding and have >> fun to own a dozen of halfbaken

Am 12.03.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Andy Walsh: > Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > >> bloatware means unsecure, uncomfortable webinterfaces with limited >> functionality compared what iptables alone offers you with some knowledge > >> all that embedded crap is for people which needs handholding and have >> fun to own a dozen of halfbaken

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:19:13PM +0000, Andy Walsh wrote: > Jeremy Allison <jra <at> samba.org> writes: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:16:36AM +0000, Andy Walsh wrote: > > > > > > Also keep in mind that samba3.6 was successfully adopted on any device that > > > had a usb2.0 port in the past. So slapping a usbstick/sdcard/hdd on a

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:31:13PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > i personally don't care what any soho-equipment manufacturer does or not, so > it's not abut "attitude" - it's simple logic - and maybe the switch to GPLv3 > is the reason for the whole subject "The sad state of samba 4 adaption" Utter bollocks, and I have the OEMs to prove it.

Am 12.03.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 12.03.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Sketch: >>> On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>> >>>> GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba >>>> on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:50:50PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: > El 12/03/16 a les 12:37, Rowland penny ha escrit: > > >Well yes, but these are usually a mass market product and will no doubt, > >in the fullness of time, get to use a version of Samba 4 seeing as how > >3.6 has been EOL since March 2015. > > You'd be surprised to see what old shi^H^H^H

Am 12.03.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Sketch: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba >> on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no >> DRM. >> >> If you find a Samba device using any Samba 3.2 or >> newer that doesn't allow you to replace it, please >> let us know so we can

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: > Unfortunately it seems it is using a really old version of samba > > $ telnet x.x.x.x > Trying x.x.x.x... > Connected to x.x.x.x. > Escape character is '^]'. > F680 > Login: root > Password: > > BusyBox v1.01 (2015.04.27-11:59+0000) Built-in shell (ash) > Enter 'help' for a list

On 12/03/16 16:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:50:50PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> El 12/03/16 a les 12:37, Rowland penny ha escrit: >> >>> Well yes, but these are usually a mass market product and will no doubt, >>> in the fullness of time, get to use a version of Samba 4 seeing as how >>> 3.6 has been EOL since March 2015.

El 12/03/16 a les 18:27, Jeremy Allison ha escrit: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> Unfortunately it seems it is using a really old version of samba [...] >> Version 1.9.16p10 >> -D become a daemon >> -p port listen on the specified port >> -d debuglevel set the

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: > GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba > on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no > DRM. > > If you find a Samba device using any Samba 3.2 or > newer that doesn't allow you to replace it, please > let us know so we can start the compliance process. I wonder how that will play out with the new

Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > no, it's not for the masses, for the masses is what comes out-of-the-box > > there is not much difference between replace the operating system on a > mass-product and just setup my own box from-scratch in the end > i know what modern arm based devices can do > > the HP microserver comes with a >

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Sketch: > >On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > >>GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba > >>on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no > >>DRM. > >> > >>If you find a Samba device using any

El 12/03/16 a les 17:08, Jeremy Allison ha escrit: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:50:50PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> El 12/03/16 a les 12:37, Rowland penny ha escrit: >> >>> Well yes, but these are usually a mass market product and will no doubt, >>> in the fullness of time, get to use a version of Samba 4 seeing as how >>> 3.6 has been EOL since March

Greetings. I'm new to tinc, but have so far managed to get a couple laptops and a hosted server all connected. They're working as expected, running Tinc 1.1-pre11, which I compiled from source. Next I want to move on to adding my home router into the mix. My routers run OpenWRT. I don't have experience compiling anything from source for OpenWRT, but OpenWRT has Tinc 1.0.25