similar to: samba-4.3.6 and talloc-2.1.6

On 17:21:44 wrote Andrey Cherepanov: > I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and > samba-4.3.6. > But if I provision domain by command > > samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test > --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc > --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes > > I got error: > Fixing

On 12/03/16 14:20, Andrey Cherepanov wrote: > I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and > samba-4.3.6. > But if I provision domain by command > > samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test > --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc > --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes > > I got error: >

Hello, after migrating a samba NT-style domain from Samba 4.2.14-debian (debian 8.10) to samba 4.5.12-debian (debian 9.4) We copied all tdb-files to the new machine plus the smb.conf plus /etc/group. The old Samba has tdbsam as backend. we use the same domain and hostname on the new DC as it was set on the old system. We are using bind9 as DNS-backend in the new system. The "samba-tool

It's amazing how long Samba just keeps running even when apparently everything's broken. In preparation of finally upgrading our DCs to 41.0, I ran dbcheck on all of them, resulting in: graz-dc-sem: > Checking 3861 objects > Error: governsID CN=ucsUser,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=tao,DC=at on 1.3.6.1.4.1.19414.3.2.2 already exists as an attributeId or governsId > Error:

12.03.2016 17:57, Rowland penny пишет: >> What policy of using new version of libraries for stable version of >> Samba? Can I fix domain provision with talloc-2.1.6 for samba-4.3.6? >> > > Can I ask why you are building talloc separately ? If you build Samba > normally, it will be built for you. I am no expert here, but I think > Samba relies on the builtin version of

Hello all, I am looking to setup a Samba AD on my NAS. I am currently using the latest version of NAS4Free which has Samba bundled into it already. However, I am getting a very nasty error when I go in to setup the samba service: Initializing... Looking up IPv4 addresses Looking up IPv6 addresses No IPv6 address will be assigned Setting up share.ldb Setting up secrets.ldb Setting up the

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:17:42 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:27:13 -0500 > Andrew Walker via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I'm sorry. I probably should have linked their samba fork: > > https://github.com/freenas/samba You can look at the commits from > > around the time period of

Hi, Anyone knows what is this? [root at artemis bin]# ./samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [DOM.CITY10.COM.BR]: Domain [DOM]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [187.85.85.1]: Administrator password: Retype

I am trying to setup samba as a dc using bind dlz I'm not sure how much I need to setup on bind before I can use it. I did the following check. [root at dc1 ~]# named -V | sed 's/ /\n/g'| grep '\-\-' |grep -e gssapi -e dlopen '--with-dlopen=yes' '--with-gssapi=yes' I am using the default config for samba that came with Fedora Rawhide. I wanted to try out the

I'm sorry. I probably should have linked their samba fork: https://github.com/freenas/samba You can look at the commits from around the time period of the bug report. It looks like quite a lot of work in ./python/samba/provision/ On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:23:28 -0500 > Andrew Walker via samba

Am 24.07.2014 10:53, schrieb C.Kindler: > > Hello Achim, > > having similar troubles as mentioned on > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-July/182916.html in our domain > > > How to solve the replication error? > > Many thanks, > Chris > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *C.Kindler* <kindc1 at gmail.com <mailto:kindc1 at

Hello, I have a problem with samba provisioning as DC. CentOS 7, built from tarball using samba howto. Below is the output. I would have filled bug report, but the "New Account" in bugzilla is not working also :( [root at dc samba-4.6.0]# samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --realm navidom.office.navi.pl --domain NAVIDOM --server-role dc --adminpass DuDu778$$# --dns-backend

-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: Fwd: dnsdomainzone replication failure Datum: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:32:56 +0200 Von: C.Kindler <kindc1 at gmail.com> An: Achim Gottinger <achim at ag-web.biz> Many thanks! I didnt thought about Microsoft Admin Tools :-) - Yes with this is much easier: Now the replication goes a little forward: in the logs there are now such

On Tue, 15 May 2018 08:07:27 +0200 Stefan Kania <stefan at kania-online.de> wrote: > Good morning, > > today we started allover with a new machine, we got the same errors > but now we have an errormessage when doing a "samba-tool dbcheck" > --------------- > root at addc:~# samba-tool dbcheck > Checking 664 objects > ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception -

Bind-9.11 is installed. How do you configure it? Does it need anything special in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf afterwards? My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way through it's configuration with no errors. I've

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > See inline comments > And Please keep replies to the list > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:08:26 -0600 > Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Samba's wiki didn't have a walk through working example from A to Z. > > It is great don't get me wrong but I

On 03/07/2019 15:50, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > It's amazing how long Samba just keeps running even when apparently > everything's broken. > > In preparation of finally upgrading our DCs to 41.0, I ran dbcheck on > all of them, resulting in: > > graz-dc-sem: >> Checking 3861 objects >> Error: governsID

I'm trying to configure an SoC system as an AD DC on Ubuntu 18.04. I was successful on Ubuntu 16.04 a couple of years ago, and the script I used to configure the system from first boot to provisioned fails on 18.04 and 16.04. The failure is thus: Setting up self join set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741637,

Hi Rowland, after we solved the puzzle today here is what we found: The Samba PDC with tdbsam backend was installed a loooooong time ago. Many updates and distributions later, the Samba PDC was still running with with the same databases and the same smb.conf. The only thing that someone sometime changed was the hostname and the NetBIOS-Name in smb.conf. BUT in secrets.tdb was still the old name.

Hi, I believe some Neon code doesn't get invoked properly, because all PRESUME macros were set in my build. Probably not all optimized functions are called directly under iOS. Regards, Victor -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Lennox Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 11:59 AM To: Victor Cherepanov Cc: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] NEON detection under iOs On iOS, configure