Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "mkdir-dup test flapping"
2016 Mar 09
0
mkdir-dup test flapping
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote
> the attached patch.
Great catch you guys ! Thanks for taking a look,
I've been busy on other stuff for the past few
weeks.
Let me go through the issue and proposed code
*really* carefully :-). The open code can
be really tricky (as you've
2016 Aug 27
2
Issue with acl_xattr:ignore system acls in 4.5rc2
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > >
> > > Cheerio!
> > > -slow
> >
> > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing:
> >
> > When adding the
2016 Aug 26
2
Issue with acl_xattr:ignore system acls in 4.5rc2
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we
> > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is
>
2016 Mar 09
0
mkdir-dup test flapping
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote
> the attached patch.
>
> We need to decide if the change in owner is enough reason to refuse
> the open(), or if we should just continue.
>
> On the basis that the owner change is not significant, we reworked the
> code to do the
2016 Aug 29
1
Issue with acl_xattr:ignore system acls in 4.5rc2
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote:
>
> ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for
> forgetting this in the previous version.
Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-).
I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the
code and realized that adding the following change made it
much clearer (at least to me).
diff --git
2016 Aug 26
2
Issue with acl_xattr:ignore system acls in 4.5rc2
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
>
> Cheerio!
> -slow
Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing:
When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in
[PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function
this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements
incorrect.
Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()
2015 Apr 18
2
Samba 4 slow write
Hi all,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 03:00:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:42:48PM +0200, Ervin Heged?s wrote:
> > Dear Samba users,
> >
> > here is an Ubuntu 14.04, with Samba 4 (4.1.6), and LDAP (slapd
> > 2.4.31). The config came from a previous system (Debian Squeezy),
> > which had been crashed (HW error - on this new machine,
2007 Jan 29
5
ACLs fail in 3.0.23d
Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba
Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor
does it display the existing ACLs.
- I have setup ACLs in my Kernel
- I have translated and installed libacl and libattr
- I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl.
- I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes
- I have enabled
2005 Sep 21
2
locking.tdb: expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied)
Hi,
I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can
create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show
[2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied)
[2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,
2003 Apr 04
2
2.2.1a / 2.2.2 bug is back in 2.2.8
Hello,
Back when 2.2.2 was the current samba release I came across the following problem when deleting folders in Windows 2000 which I'll repost again below. After I finally got his attention with a few very wordy messages to the samba mailing list, Jeremy fixed it blazingly fast and wrote me back:
"I just found the problem and fixed it in 2.2 CVS and HEAD CVS. It was
to do with the
2006 Feb 16
1
Too Many Ace Entries for file
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I am encountering a problem with Samba and setting acl's for
files/directories from the security dialog on my Windows clients. I
can easily toggle the file permissions. However, it am not able to
add/remove user/groups from the GUI interface on my windows clients. I
have also noticed when I add access with setfacl it doesn't not
2013 Jan 24
0
64 Bit Build 3.6.11 on AIX 6 with acls enabled dumps core,
Hi,
this is the first time I've tryed to build a 64 Bit Version with acl's
enabled - so I expect I could duplicate this with older versions too...
Here's the build info:
System: AIX 6100-07-01-1141
Compiler: IBM xlc
CC=xlc_r -g
CXX=xlC_r
CFLAGS=-qmaxmem=-1 -DSYSV -D_AIX -D_AIX32 -D_AIX41 -D_AIX43 -D_AIX51
-D_AIX52 -D_AIX53 -D_AIX61 -D_ALL_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -O
2022 Jul 18
1
[Announce] Samba 4.16.3 Available for Download
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series.
Changes since 4.16.2
--------------------
o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
?? * BUG 15099: Using vfs_streams_xattr and deleting a file causes a panic.
o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz>
?? * BUG 14986: Add support for bind 9.18.
?? * BUG
2022 Jul 18
1
[Announce] Samba 4.16.3 Available for Download
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series.
Changes since 4.16.2
--------------------
o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
?? * BUG 15099: Using vfs_streams_xattr and deleting a file causes a panic.
o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz>
?? * BUG 14986: Add support for bind 9.18.
?? * BUG
1999 Jul 02
1
preexec: return code not used? (PR#18576)
T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote:
>
>
> But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec
> be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script
> above would be modified to generate this return code.
>
> Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check
> the return code (calling smbrun to do the
2007 Mar 24
2
Subtle bug in do_basename
Hello,
I've been wondering why my no-optimization R-devel builds have been
hanging during "building/updating package indices ...". I tracked it
down with gdb to this line from do_basename in utils.c:
while ( *(p = buf + strlen(buf) - 1) == fsp ) *p = '\0';
Now, imagine if your compiler places the variable fsp immediately before
buf on the stack, and strlen(buf) is 0.
2015 Jul 22
13
[PULL 0/8] MultiFS suppport for BIOS and EFI
So last week I was wondering if XFS was still working -- even with its
last on-disk structure changes -- and it _suprisingly_ worked as
expected. Right, now I can finally get rid of GRUB and use Syslinux to
boot my Linux on EFI from a rootfs with xfs. Shit, I have two
partitions (the first one being the required ESP) so there is no way to
access the other partitions since because Syslinux does not
2005 Oct 10
6
Dangling MS Access DB Lock Files *.ldb
I have an intermittent problem with dangling MS Access DB lock files.
In a productive environment with N batch queus (each on a separate
Windows XP Professional) a scheduler PC dispatches the work load to
a free queue by means of modifying a simple MS Access DB file
called "PRIM.mdb", which resides on a Samba 3.0.20 share. Each free
queue PC polls the same MS Access DB file every 60
2017 Jan 07
2
frequent core dumps (invalid lock_order?)
Hi,
I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version
is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on
each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack
trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order".
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Sergei
#0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from
2002 Sep 10
2
Who may delete a file ?
Hi All,
I was checking the access rights and a problem (hence a question)
appeared: Who can delete a file through Samba ?
Suppose we have the following situation:
drwxrwxrwx john finance directory
-rw-r--r-- jack finance directory/file
Under unix everyone can delete the file.
Under Samba, the documentation says (due to the Windows sementic) you
also need the write access to the