similar to: mkdir-dup test flapping

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote > the attached patch. Great catch you guys ! Thanks for taking a look, I've been busy on other stuff for the past few weeks. Let me go through the issue and proposed code *really* carefully :-). The open code can be really tricky (as you've

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > > Cheerio! > > > -slow > > > > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: > > > > When adding the

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is >

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote > the attached patch. > > We need to decide if the change in owner is enough reason to refuse > the open(), or if we should just continue. > > On the basis that the owner change is not significant, we reworked the > code to do the

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Cheerio! > -slow Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in [PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements incorrect. Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()

Hi all, On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 03:00:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:42:48PM +0200, Ervin Heged?s wrote: > > Dear Samba users, > > > > here is an Ubuntu 14.04, with Samba 4 (4.1.6), and LDAP (slapd > > 2.4.31). The config came from a previous system (Debian Squeezy), > > which had been crashed (HW error - on this new machine,

Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor does it display the existing ACLs. - I have setup ACLs in my Kernel - I have translated and installed libacl and libattr - I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl. - I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes - I have enabled

Hi, I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show [2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767) tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,

Hello, Back when 2.2.2 was the current samba release I came across the following problem when deleting folders in Windows 2000 which I'll repost again below. After I finally got his attention with a few very wordy messages to the samba mailing list, Jeremy fixed it blazingly fast and wrote me back: "I just found the problem and fixed it in 2.2 CVS and HEAD CVS. It was to do with the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I am encountering a problem with Samba and setting acl's for files/directories from the security dialog on my Windows clients. I can easily toggle the file permissions. However, it am not able to add/remove user/groups from the GUI interface on my windows clients. I have also noticed when I add access with setfacl it doesn't not

Hi, this is the first time I've tryed to build a 64 Bit Version with acl's enabled - so I expect I could duplicate this with older versions too... Here's the build info: System: AIX 6100-07-01-1141 Compiler: IBM xlc CC=xlc_r -g CXX=xlC_r CFLAGS=-qmaxmem=-1 -DSYSV -D_AIX -D_AIX32 -D_AIX41 -D_AIX43 -D_AIX51 -D_AIX52 -D_AIX53 -D_AIX61 -D_ALL_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -O

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Changes since 4.16.2 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15099: Using vfs_streams_xattr and deleting a file causes a panic. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 14986: Add support for bind 9.18. ?? * BUG

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Changes since 4.16.2 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15099: Using vfs_streams_xattr and deleting a file causes a panic. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 14986: Add support for bind 9.18. ?? * BUG

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

Hello, I've been wondering why my no-optimization R-devel builds have been hanging during "building/updating package indices ...". I tracked it down with gdb to this line from do_basename in utils.c: while ( *(p = buf + strlen(buf) - 1) == fsp ) *p = '\0'; Now, imagine if your compiler places the variable fsp immediately before buf on the stack, and strlen(buf) is 0.

So last week I was wondering if XFS was still working -- even with its last on-disk structure changes -- and it _suprisingly_ worked as expected. Right, now I can finally get rid of GRUB and use Syslinux to boot my Linux on EFI from a rootfs with xfs. Shit, I have two partitions (the first one being the required ESP) so there is no way to access the other partitions since because Syslinux does not

I have an intermittent problem with dangling MS Access DB lock files. In a productive environment with N batch queus (each on a separate Windows XP Professional) a scheduler PC dispatches the work load to a free queue by means of modifying a simple MS Access DB file called "PRIM.mdb", which resides on a Samba 3.0.20 share. Each free queue PC polls the same MS Access DB file every 60

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

Hi All, I was checking the access rights and a problem (hence a question) appeared: Who can delete a file through Samba ? Suppose we have the following situation: drwxrwxrwx john finance directory -rw-r--r-- jack finance directory/file Under unix everyone can delete the file. Under Samba, the documentation says (due to the Windows sementic) you also need the write access to the