similar to: Fetching ACL data from extended attributes

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Fetching ACL data from extended attributes"

2018 Jun 14
4
Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:39:46 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > And i did read the Comment to for Rowland below, > On debian you need : > libnss-winbind libpam-winbind to be installed. > I think you miss one of these. They are the glue that connects Samba to nsswitch and allows 'getent passwd username' to work. Without
2016 Jun 25
4
Rights issue on GPO
Am 25.06.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Achim Gottinger: > > > Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 24.06.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 24/06/16 21:35, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>>> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at
2016 Jun 27
2
Rights issue on GPO
On 26/06/16 12:43, Achim Gottinger wrote: > Created an feature request > > "add resolving for well known security principals" > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11997 > > Am 25.06.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 25.06.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >>> >>> >>> Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16
2009 Mar 04
9
samba 3.3.x vfs_acl_xattr support
>From samba 3.3.0 release notes, it seems like samba 3.3.x is at least experimenting using xattr to store NT ACL, which can eventually provide better NT ACL support. I tried similar features with samba 4.0.0 alpha6, which works very nice. Is there any plan to provide same level of NT ACL support with samba 3.3.x? If there is such plan, any targeted date for that? Thanks, Ying
2016 Jun 27
6
Rights issue on GPO
Hai, After lots of testing and checking today im must concluded that achim and mathias are right. There are "BUILDIN\" security groups which make some GPOs are going wrong. Also, im getting errors again with sysvolcheck. .. i was in the understanding this was resolved.. but im but off with all info, very buzy at the office atm. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class
2018 Sep 21
6
[SOLVED] Samba 4: 'Access denied' error when accessing user profile during logon
Hai, Now, i did not know you used the DC for the profiles here but yes it looks good. Small comment on point 3 and 4. 3) Its good, you might notice a few more rights there compaired to what i posted, thats because you have your profiles on the DC but the settings are good. 4) yes, the security is ok, i like the higher security setting and try to mimic the windows settings as much as
2016 Mar 15
2
static vs shared modules build
> it may make sense to build others which you really use on every > machine statically to not need to add them in your smb.conf That's what I expected, too. Since then I made some experiences. I built samba 4.3.6 with a static vfs_acl_xattr module. It is builtin alright, it is listed under "Builtin modules" at the output of "smbd -b". Then: -- Comment"vfs
2018 Sep 07
2
"missing security tab" and related ACL issues
Am 07.09.18 um 12:45 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:22:36 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> At a customer server (gentoo linux, so far only Samba version 4.7.7) >> we tried to use Windows ACLs and failed: >> >> no security tab in Windows ... for local C: yes, not on
2016 Mar 12
3
static vs shared modules build
> i would give the same device for *any* type of software since the > whole operating system including the kernel itself these days is built > with shared modules and you hardly gain anything measureable just > because one piece of your system is statically compiled > > when it's mostly interesting on very slow embedded devices where it > makes a small difference in
2018 Sep 21
1
[SOLVED] Samba 4: 'Access denied' error when accessing user profile during logon
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 21 september 2018 10:11 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] [SOLVED] Samba 4: 'Access denied' > error when accessing user profile during logon > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:35:13 +0200 >
2017 Aug 24
5
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
Ok, rechecked this, your correct. This did work fine. In now at samba 4.6.7, you? This worked untill ( last i checked ) 4.6.5 :-(( now sysvolreset is totaly broken. :-(( New thing for my ToDo list.. Try this script, the rights are my defaults "after a sysvol reset" Place the script somewhere within /var/lib/samba Preffered that location . Run it with : bash script.sh sysvol/ !
2018 Jun 14
4
Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have either > libnss-winbind or libpam-winbind files on my AD/DC. I keep forgetting that you use slackware, I suppose it uses something different, but do you have any file like: libnss_winbind.so.2 > > Circling back
2016 Jun 14
3
since i added second DC i have some trouble
Hi, i provisioned a domain and all went well, until i added the second dc.... for example: the new DC2 tells me: getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol # owner: root # group: BUILTIN\134administrators user::rwx user:root:rwx user:BUILTIN\134administrators:rwx user:BUILTIN\134users:r-x user:ELEMAY\134guest:rwx user:ELEMAY\134domain\040guests:r-x
2016 Jun 14
3
since i added second DC i have some trouble
On 6/14/2016 1:16 PM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 14/06/16 17:38, J. Echter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i provisioned a domain and all went well, until i added the second >> dc.... >> >> for example: >> >> the new DC2 tells me: >> >> getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> >> # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> #
2016 May 25
2
Regression: The 'net' command is now failing to login (UNKNOWN ENUM VALUE 1003?)
Hello: Platform: CentOS 6.7 x86-64 $ rpm -qa | grep samba samba-common-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba4-libs-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 ie-samba-utils-3.6.13-7.x86_64 samba-winbind-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-client-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.i686 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 Problems began after requiring SMB signing (I forgot the specifics but it was
2019 Aug 27
3
Permissions at the top of a Samba share
Am 2019-08-26 um 16:35 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 26/08/2019 15:20, ? Peter Rindfuss via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a question regarding permissions at the top of a share as seen >> from a Windows 10 client. >> >> We are using Samba 4.10.6-Debian (van Belle) on Debian 10 (Buster) with >> one AD controller and one file server. >>
2015 Nov 10
2
NT ACL preservation
Hey, hoping I can get some guidance on how this works. I've got a running samba standalone setup. On one of my shares, I want to preserve the ACL of files as they come from the client (Win 7), in essence acting as a file backup. My setup for this share is currently: valid users = @wheel public = no writeable = yes vfs objects = btrfs acl_xattr # acl_xattr: ignore system acls = yes # map
2017 Sep 29
3
user cannot access shares on new ad-dc
> On 29.09.2017 11:44 Rowland Penny wrote: > Have you set up the libnss_winbind links, PAM and /etc/nsswitch.conf ? Yes, I had modified two lines in /etc/nsswitch.conf: passwd: files winbind group: files winbind No, I had not seen a pointer to libnss, but now did ln -s /usr/local/samba/lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ ln -s
2017 Jan 13
1
Duplicate xidNumbers
Hello Samba team, I have 3 production samba DCs version 4.5.1 serving the same domain (2 sites) and all are having the same problems, I believe based on two duplicate xidNumbers described below. xidNumbers 3000002 & 3000003 have two SIDs assigned while xidNumbers 3000011 & 3000012 have no SIDs assigned. Is fixing this as simple as moving one of the duplicates to the empty xidNumber
2019 Aug 26
2
Permissions at the top of a Samba share
Hi, I have a question regarding permissions at the top of a share as seen from a Windows 10 client. We are using Samba 4.10.6-Debian (van Belle) on Debian 10 (Buster) with one AD controller and one file server. The top directory of our main share on the file server has, on the Linux level, these permissions reported by getfacl: # file: ... # owner: root # group: domain\040users # flags: ---