similar to: which DNS backend ?

Hello. which are the main differences between Samba_Internal and BIND9_DLZ ? I refer to the differences about functionality such as zone transfers and automatic updates. Which others functionalities offers BIND9, that Samba_Internal doesn't support ? Is it possible to use a DNS Server (Bind9) separate of the DC Samba4? I mean, in other server. Thanks for reply, FelipeGS6 .

Hi Rowland, Would you care to elaborate on that last sentence? I've not seen that mentioned before and I'm very curios about your reasons for saying it, especially as we're using internal DNS for our two DCs. regards, John On 29/02/16 06:18, Rowland penny wrote: > On 28/02/16 18:30, Felipe_G0NZÁLEZ_SANTIAG0 wrote: >> Hello list, I need to know which DNS backend is using

My first Active Directory setup had two DC's and shortly after getting things going the second DC created a hardware failure issue and I just continued life with one DC. Now, while upgrading I am returning to two DC's. In a normal Bind9 "master and slave" setup the master always "feeds" the slave. With Bind9_DLZ setup (recommended to be used with Samba4) there is

Hello guys, For those who already have an external DNS server on a separate machine, how the best way to work with Samba4 ? How to integrate this bind server with Samba configuration ways in relation to dns (samba_internal/bind_dlz)

> > I have been doing a bit of investigation and I 'think' we do have a tool > ;-) > Gooooooooddd!! :-) > If you examine 'samba_upgradedns', at the top it says this: > # Upgrade DNS provision from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL > I think if you use it to upgrade to either BIND_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL, > it should create the required AD

Hello! Yes already tried this, both he always says that the account already exists even if it does not exist, it affects only dicamicas entries, entries staticas work and replication as well, but as dynamic are troubled by instances in Multiple Sites will have problems ... But some log or command that can help? Thanks Em 30-12-2015 18:38, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 30/12/15 19:57,

Le 16/10/2019 ? 12:07, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 16/10/2019 10:59, nathalie ramat wrote: >> ???????????? Checking file: /etc/samba/smb.conf >> >> # Global parameters >> [global] >> ?????? dns forwarder = 192.168.xx.230 > You cannot forward to the DC itself, it needs to be a dns server > outside the AD dns domain. >> ?????? netbios name =

Hello guys: I need to know a strategy to identify which dns-backend are Samba4 DC using: BIND9 or Internal? Some time ago someone told me I can check this by verifying if exists the user 'dns-hostname'. But, what if this user has been deleted? Or, what's the situation if I need to get the dns-backend on a replication environment? On the other hand, How can I know if my server is

> > Not so much forgetting but not understanding ;-) - Internal DNS that responds to our services (site, moodle, etc) - ns.myinstitution.edu (registered in registro.br) - Samba DNS answering for samba stuff - addc.myinstitution.edu Maybe it's better to use SAMBA_INTERNAL instead of BIND_DLZ? On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>

Hallo, We have Samba4 (Sernet, Version4.1) on a Debian Wheezy server. There we try to use our Infoblox (It is our primary and secondary DNS server) as an external DNS server for the active directory on the samba4 server. It doesn?t matter which setup option (Samba_internal, bind_dlz, none) we use it doesn?t work. Harry

Le 16/10/2019 ? 11:17, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 16/10/2019 09:43, nathalie ramat wrote: >> >> I put the trace of the script : > OK, only two problems, one minor, one possibly catastrophic ;-) >> >> Collected config?? --- 2019-10-16-10:23 ----------- >> >> ???????????? Checking file: /etc/hosts >> >> 127.0.0.1?????? localhost

On 05/08/2019 10:14, Patrik wrote: > I am not using flatfiles and i using BIND_DLZ it shows in my log and i > do not use flatfiles. BIND_DLZ only. Oh yes you are, you have this in your /etc/bind/named.conf.local : ??? zone "patrikx3.com" { ??????? type master; ??????? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com"; ??????? include

Il giorno mar 17 dic 2019 alle ore 17:49 Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> ha scritto: In the last year this has come up a few times, try reading this > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/817470/how-to-reconfigure-an-msdcs-subdomain-to-a-forest-wide-dns-application > It looks like we need a tool to correct AD :-( > Thanks! I will read that article. Do

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Hi, We are in the process of migrating our samba AD (4.1.0pre1-GIT-6be458d) to the latest 4.7.0 release. In the process we want to switch from the BIND_DLZ to the internal dns server. I have done some experiments in our test environment and everything seems to work ok, but I'm not sure how to handle the dns backend change. Is it just the case of running samba_upgradedns

I had configured Samba AD's with Bind9_DLZ in all DC. But for some reason (i couldn't determine) three (sambadc02,03,04) AD's responded very slowly . So change to Samba_Internal backend into the servers with problem and works fine. sambadc01 -> with FSMO roles - Bind9_DLZ sambadc02 -> Samba_Internal sambadc03 -> Samba_Internal sambadc04 -> Samba_Internal My question is:

Hi Rowland, Thank you. Yes to the first point. We are using Bind9 but to continue using it is not necessarily set in stone. If using Samba Internal DNS makes more sense then we can do that too. The question is do we need to do dns-upgrade and use Internal DNS, pre-migration? Then use internal dns during the classic migration? Also, I assume the bind9 service will have to stopped if infact we

On 11/28/2017 2:38 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:53:32 -0600 > Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of >> dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because >> systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - >>

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > So, it sounds like you have a PDC for the domain 'DOMAIN' and an AD DC > for the domain 'DOMAIN' both using the same SID, I don't think this is > going to work. I suggest you turn the old PDC off. No no no! I'm not mad! ;-) There's the OLD PDC for the domain 'SVCORSI', and the new AD DC

Hello, I'm installing Samba4 AD from repo Ubuntu16.04. These are the steps I've applied: 1. editing fstab in EXT3 2. install dependencies ( acl attr quota fam libnet-ldap-perl ) 3. install krb5-user, bind9, ntp, winbind, ldbtools and samba. 4. remove smb.conf, if exists 5. samba-tool provision 6. Restart services bind9, ntp and samba 7. config Bind9