similar to: Windows ACLs and Replication

A Samba server I've configured uses the VFS acl_xattr module to support Windows ACLs. I'd like to view the ACL data, in as raw a state as possible, but also in a human readable format. Is there an existing utility that does that? If not, and I need to write an application to accomplish it, which APIs would you recommend (and on which attributes)? Thanks,Steve Tice

Hi all, I'm debugging a performance problem for a client. Needless to say, the organisation of their data is such that this problem is really annoying. Here's the situation: Samba 3.0.x PDC in a mixed 9x/nt/xp environment, using acls. When trying to delete a large number of folders from a folder, the 'preparing to delete' stage takes about half hour. It's simple to repeat:

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:21:21 -0400 rac8006 at aol.com wrote: > > > If it is only a windows problem. Wouldn't windows try to do this > sequence to all shared devices? This only happens to the devices > running 4.3.11. Each device has a Public folder mapped to a windows > drive letter. There are 5 samba shares > > mapped on the windows PC. Two running 4.3.11 and

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Hi, My problem relates to SAMBA 4.0.5, especially with acl / ntacl problem. Explanation: I'm currently trying to install a TEST System with a Samba4 ADDC system, using Ubuntu server 12.04. I've successfully completed the install and followed mostly the howto's on samba.org for SAMBA4. I'm currently struggling with changing ACL on the Samba 4 Share itself, and

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

The latest version that Western Digital has shipped with the My cloud devices accesses the disk about twice a minute. The access to /dev/sda2 is causing the system to keep the disk from going into standby mode. I don't understand the call to quotactl every minute when no one is trying to access the share. An strace of one of the processes shows the following: poll([{fd=13,

Can anybody provide the expected response to an SMB2 CREATE request that includes ACCESS_SYSTEM_SECURITY in the DesiredAccess mask? I?m particularly interested in cases where the SMB client is connected as an authenticated user with administrative (superuser) privileges on the share, and has made the request on a directory. Should such a client expect full (read/change) access to the SACL (under

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== New Minimum MIT Krb5 version for Samba AD Domain Controller ----------------------------------------------------------- Samba now requires MIT 1.21 when built against a system MIT Krb5

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== New Minimum MIT Krb5 version for Samba AD Domain Controller ----------------------------------------------------------- Samba now requires MIT 1.21 when built against a system MIT Krb5

[ Received no feedback, i resend it... ] A little strange things, but i'm hitting my head on the wall... I needed to 'enlarge' my main filesystem (XFS backed-up), that contain my main samba share and a brick for a GFS share; i've setup a new volume (for the VM), formatted XFS, move all the file taking care to umount and stop GFS (so, syncing the brick, not the GFS filesystem)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5298 Summary: xattrs and acls do not work well together along with fake-super, even worse on XFS Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

A little strange things, but i'm hitting my head on the wall... I needed to 'enlarge' my main filesystem (XFS backed-up), that contain my main samba share and a brick for a GFS share; i've setup a new volume (for the VM), formatted XFS, move all the file taking care to umount and stop GFS (so, syncing the brick, not the GFS filesystem) using --acls and -attrs rsync options. All

Hi, I am using kernel 3.7-rc6. I have written a test application for extended attributes and have for some folders a wired behaviour: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <attr/xattr.h> char attrs[1024]; ssize_t attrslen; int i; char value[1024]; ssize_t valuelen; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Syntax: testxattr

I am trying to solve what I perceive as undesirable behavior of my Samba server. Please understand I am not claiming this is a bug in Samba. It is simply different from the behavior I want, and I'm asking for help in modifying the behavior. My Samba server is version 3.5.4 (release 68.el6) and runs under CentOS 6.0 (x86_64). I happen to use Active Directory (AD) to authenticate, but am not

Hi everyone, I've noticed a problem with Debian wheezy + samba 3.6.6 configured with acl_xattr in my configuration. The following test sequence causes Windows Explorer to report incorrectly ordered permission entries: 1) Map a share as with "admin" user credentials to a drive letter on a Windows client 2) Create a folder at the root of the share "rootfolder" 3) Create a