similar to: Crash (talloc error) after failed chdir

Dear all, I've an issue with my samba installation with a version of samba 4.9.2 that I’ve compiled for Ubuntu 16.04. Samba works without any particular issues until I try to use the sharing for Time Machine backup. In fact, after starting the Time Machine backup after a while, random time like 2-3 hours of backup, I got the following panic error and the backup stops and I need to reboot

Hello, I've encountered recurring issue with samba crashes when creating initial Time Machine backup on samba share from Mac. Whole scenario, details about software and logs are below. On Mac client: connected to smb share with "valid user" account; added smb share as Time Machine disk. Time machine has been set for automatic backup, I've selected Back Up Now. Connection dies

Am 2015-12-30 um 10:40 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Thanks a lot for that explanation. > I read it after it started working here yesterday so excuse my late > reply. I never understood it the way you described it above, this would > have helped me with other servers earlier as well. Maybe off topic or another issue, but I add it to this thread as it affects the same server. The

pls see this logs as well : Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: [2016/01/05 12:08:21.401618, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report) Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: =============================================================== Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: [2016/01/05 12:08:21.401904, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:79(fault_report) Jän 05 12:08:21

Hi, everybody. I can't understand the nature of the exact error on my samba-server. I'd be very thanksfull for some help... Here's situation: One Linux-server (CentOS 7.2) with Samba and a network of 14 noteboks (win 10). At some point, during working day, smb starts dumping core and syslog giving us the following: 2016-01-16 18:45:15 err infoclinik daemon smbd 2016-01-16

Sorry for the delay and thanks for your pointers. "allow insecure wide links" does not change the behaviour, tried that before. Which is strange, if you look at the code. On the other hand it is clearly not a static misconfiguration, otherwise I would be able to reproduce it. About half of the time, we get a PANIC about 5 to 10 minutes after these strange widelinks_warnings appear in

I could really need some help with this .... -> still problems here Am 2016-01-05 um 12:23 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > pls see this logs as well : > > > Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: [2016/01/05 > 12:08:21.401618, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report) > Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: >

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via samba wrote: > Dear List, > > I updated to samba 4.12.10-SerNet-Debian-9.buster from 4.12.9 > and did a > > gluster volume set volume performance.write-behind off > > Now I get this in /var/log/syslog and randomly people don't get access > to a shae. Can you load the debug symbols please ? That should

Hi, Bartlett I decided to cut some subsystem by myself, So I spent several days to study the SAMBA 4 WAF build system and now know the base steps of build. but which subsystem can be removed for snmd/nmbd/smbpasswd ? followings are the full dependencies of these 3 binary ldd bin/smbpasswd libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7139000) libsamba-util.so.0 =>

Dear Jeremy, thanks for your reply. I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the [global] section? I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again. Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it. Best Bene Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via

Dear List, I updated to samba 4.12.10-SerNet-Debian-9.buster from 4.12.9 and did a gluster volume set volume performance.write-behind off Now I get this in /var/log/syslog and randomly people don't get access to a shae. Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]: [2020/11/09 15:56:14.078120,? 0] ../../source3/lib/popt_common.c:68(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn) Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]:??

Dear all, we updated to 4.12.10-10 using the sernet packages. After approx. 30 minutes I obtainted the following messages in syslog: root at ctdb-ho-2:~# journalctl -f -- Logs begin at Wed 2020-11-11 08:53:27 CET. -- Nov 13 13:00:18 ctdb-ho-2 smbd[30956]: [2020/11/13 13:00:18.616823, 0] ../../source3/smbd/close.c:1150(close_directory) Nov 13 13:00:18 ctdb-ho-2 smbd[30956]: close_directory:

Hello, I switched the first member server in production from 3.6 to 4.1. But since that, several times per day, smbd processes are crashing on that machine. Has anybody encountered this, too? [2013/11/05 04:14:43.532768, 0, pid=91892] ../source3/lib/popt_common.c:67(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn) talloc: access after free error - first free may be at ../source3/smbd/open.c:1529 [2013/11/05

I'd remove the distro packages providing those libs in /usr/lib, as they could possibly cause problems. One more I forgot, which might possibly be responsible for corrupting your ldb database if the wrong one is loaded by samba at runtime, is libldb. >From the log, I'm guessing your database is corrupt if it can't read the schema, but someone else might have more insight. On

2016-03-03 16:32 GMT+01:00 IT Admin <it at cliffbells.com>: > Apt and to think those packages aren't installed: > > sudo apt-get remove libtdb-dev libtalloc-dev python-talloc-dev > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Package 'libtalloc-dev' is not installed, so not removed > Package

Apt and to think those packages aren't installed: sudo apt-get remove libtdb-dev libtalloc-dev python-talloc-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package 'libtalloc-dev' is not installed, so not removed Package 'libtdb-dev' is not installed, so not removed Package 'python-talloc-dev' is not installed, so not

pytalloc: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpytalloc-util.so.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpytalloc-util.so.2.1.2 /usr/local/samba/include/pytalloc.h /usr/local/samba/lib/private/libpytalloc-util.so.2 /usr/local/samba/lib/private/libpytalloc-util.so.2.1.3 libtalloc: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtalloc.so.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtalloc.so.2.1.2

On 10/5/2020 12:16 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/10/2020 17:01, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> On 10/5/2020 11:58 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> >>> On 05/10/2020 16:30, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> Using MIT5 backend with Samba.. >>> I hope you mean on the clients, the use of MIT as the

Forgot to mention that this is on Centos 8. So maybe something different than this: https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg163085.html Regards Christian Am 16.04.20 um 13:45 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba: > Hello alAl, > after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the > vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs > from the

Well, this puts me in a catch-22 situation... I can see the benefit of spinning up VMs as ADCs, unfortunately this machine is already leveraged to the limit and there aren't any resources available to support a single additional VM, let alone two of them. And I'm scratching my head a bit here as I have another Samba ADC deployed on another network, similar host OS, similar RAID setup, and