similar to: AD authentication in active/passive cluster

Hello, I create a volume in LVM2 (thin) to use snaphots, so normal users can recover files from the snapshot. I set some parameters for samba and for the snapshots so normal users can access the snapshot and the snapshots will be listed in Windows explorer. Here my volume info ------------------------ root at cluster01:~# gluster v info Volume Name: gv1 Type: Replicate Volume ID:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I have two monitors and an nvidia graphic card. I uses the nvidia proprietary driver from rpmfusion and have configured the system to use the twinview option. I need to load an icc profile for each screen (they are not exactly the same) and this seems to be impossible under this configuration.... Am I right? So I changed my config:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 28.09.2015 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 28/09/15 11:30, Steffen Weißgerber wrote: > Hello, > > after configuring kerberos and winbind for authentication against an A D > (Window 2008 R2) and succesful launching getent passwd I followed the > instructions https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs > for

As far as I understood this privilege is available only for domains which are Active Directory domains. As you are using Samba 3.6 you shouldn't have AD domain but NT4 domain. 2015-10-01 14:49 GMT+02:00 Steffen Weißgerber <steffen at weiszgerber.de>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 28.09.2015 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > On 28/09/15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hmm why, the guy at https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/SAMBA_Share_with_Active_Directory_Login_o n_Ubuntu_12.04.html does exactly this. Also the manpage e.g. for smb.conf describes the config for a connection to an AD. And after granting file rights to the share via setfacl -m g:domänen-admins:rwx /var/samba/test I can mkdir and granting rights to

I'm getting a weird error when I try to sFTP on a CentOS box (which I don't have root access). when I run: sftp -oPort=990 user at host.domain.com I get the following error, which I suspect is a result of not being in "passive mode" (which works when I use Filezilla on Windows) Connecting to host.domain.com ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host

Grant Taylor wrote: > I''ll have to double check some things to make sure that you don''t need > to do any thing special other than just allow the initial connection and > rely on the FTP connection tracking helper to handle all other connections. > > I''ve never run an FTP server behind a NAT, but I''ve never had a problem > with the FTP

I am trying to control traffic in my server and a doubt came over me... My ftp server is set up in passive mode, so it will randomly choose a port to transfer data (in my case ports 50000-50100)... Is there a way of controlling this ftp traffic without marking packets? Thanks! Bye... msn: fredi_bieging@hotmail.com skype: fredibieging A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into

Hi, I just wanted to share my script with the list. I have been trying to shape outbound passive and active ftp traffic without affecting inbound and lan transfers. I have tried to do this for a long time and it seems that I have finally figured it out. Feel free to comment on the below script if there is anything that can be improved. It seems to work flawlessly so far. #!/bin/bash

Hi, I am trying to use the following script to limit my passive ftp traffic to 35KBytes. Problem is, it kill''s the entire connection on that computer. The script is running on the same machine as the ftp server. I was hoping to limit the ftp traffic, and only the ftp traffic, leaving the computer. It seems to limit everything, i tried transfering a file with samba and the whole

I am trying to mark outbound passive ftp traffic with iptables and shape it to 35KBytes. I am using the following script on the computer that runs the ftp server. It is not working correctly, it seems to limit ALL traffic. Cant file share or anything. Anyone might know what is wrong? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the outbound passive ftp packets on ports 50000-51000

Hi, I''m using the same set of firewall rules of 2.0.x (sorry, I can''t remember the exact minor version) and put it to work with 2.0.9. And now I can''t do passive ftp (was working before). I see that my NEWNOTSYN is set to Yes, and the loc->net rule is blocking 1024:65535. But I believe with the ip_conntrack_ftp, the passive mode would be allowed, since

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Remember my thread that I can''t FTP into my server? It seems that (well, what Tom has suggested) ip_conntrack_ftp and ip_nat_ftp weren''t loaded. I don''t know why in that particular machine mdk9.2 doesn''t load them by default, whereas in other machine they were loaded. I have put them in /etc/modules, and

Hello, everyone Here part of my dialplan context [globals] CMD_NOOP=0 CMD_DOSTUFF1=1 CMD_DOSTUFF2=2 CMD_DOSTUFF3=2 [blah-context] same => n,Set(COMMAND=${CMD_NOOP}) same => n,UserEvent(blah-event,CHANNEL:${CHANNEL(name)} same => n(COMMAND_SWITCH),GoToIf($["${COMMAND}"="${CMD_DOSTUFF1}"]?LBL_DO_STUFF1) same =>

Hello, I''m observing a weird bug with ip_nat_ftp in a somewhat more complicated constellation. It''s possible that XEN is also involved in this, but I''m not sure. What I''m trying to do is have XEN guest domains on a host, connected via a bridge into a private network. The the privileged domain attaches to this private network and acts as a NAT router to connect

Hi all, there''s an interesting citaton on kerneltrap.org, mentioning the addition of passive OS fingerprinting to the OpenBSD firewall (http://www.kerneltrap.org/node/view/770 for those interested) This new feature enables the possibility of triggering customized firewall rules according to the (detected) incoming OS, in a fully passive way. I was wondering if the above would be

Ok, from what I can see _NO_ passive ISDN cards will work with Asterisk on freebsd, is this correct & is it likely to change soon? Secondly, if this is likely to be the way for a while, what is the lease expensive card that will work with FreeBSD? Also, can I use DID (Direct Inward Dialling) on FreeBSD? Thanks for all your help to date. Regards, Cian Hughes

Author: bw Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 8256e1e381a84873d93d900e1d0735c57208e91b Log message: 6331032 in.routed deletes aggregated passive routes through remote gateways Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/in.routed/table.c

See below... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] xenoprof passive profiling and "mode" setting Date: Wednesday 05 July 2006 21:53 From: "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@intel.com> To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>, "Ray Bryant" <raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi all, I am trying to do Xen / Kernel profiling. So I tried passive domain profile with oprofile tool in Dom0 as below. * Environment 1 + i7-2600 CPU + XCP 1.6 Base ISO + CentOS 6.3 Guest (HVM,PV) * Environment 2 + i7-2600 CPU + Xen hypervisor 4.2.1 + Konrad''s passive domain profiling patch applied Dom0 Kernel ( 2.6.32 jeremy branch & 3.2.44 mainline kernel) + CentOS 6.3