similar to: samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "

Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: > On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: > > Hi at all, > > > > i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago > > from an nt4-domain. > > > > By trying > > samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ > > > > i get the

On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>> Hi at all, >>> >>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago >>> from an nt4-domain. >>> >>> By trying >>>

Hi Rowland and al. > On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>>> Hi at all, >>>> >>>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some >>>> time ago >>>> from an

Hi again, Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 12:09:59 CET schrieb Rowland penny: > On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: > >> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: [....] > Ok, there are two schools of thought here, you can give Administrator a > uidNumber attribute, but this, as far as Unix is

On 02/02/16 13:38, Markus Dellermann wrote: > Hi again, > > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 12:09:59 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: > [....] >> Ok, there are two schools of thought here, you can

On 2 September 2016 at 14:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > > > As I said, I know very little about freebsd, but you should be aware > that Samba only supports the last three major versions i.e. at the > moment 4.2.X, 4.3.x and 4.4.x > They are supported in three ways, the oldest version (now 4.2.x) only > gets security fixes, the middle

Hello! I've got this error dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. Already tried the step described here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable But when trying to delete the account used the

On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote: > > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 > > >

On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100

Hi, I try to switch from internal DNS to bind9 on an samba-ad-dc (sernet 4.1.23 on debian wheezy). I try to run samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ and get an python error pointing to /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py line 271 Reading domain information Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 261, in

On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote: > > > > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba

On 2 September 2016 at 13:19, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo gets its ideas from :) After freebsd built everything in the chain of required packages, it finally built Samba, I did notice two things, one it built

Hello, I actually have 3 principal DCs Samba version : 4.6.4 / Redhat7 All 3 DCs work with BIND9_DLZ as dns backend. Today I added a new DC to my domain assignd to a site i previously created with: samba-tool domain join mydomain.lan DC -U administrator --realm=MYDOMAIN.LAN -W mydomain --site=MYSITE* *Then I tried to migrate the dns backend of this fresh new DC to bind DLZ (as i did for

Hi, I'm trying to migrate a NT4 domain under Samba3 to an AD DC under Samba4 on a separate server. During the classicupgrade, there were a number warnings while importing groups: WARNING 2019-05-13 15:09:56,728 pid:25284 /usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/upgrade.py #299: Could not add group name=Domain Admins ((68, 'Entry CN=Domain

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Hai, Ok. I did more digging, this is a link Dennis showed which might help.. https://www.itprotoday.com/windows-78/q-how-can-i-create-domaindnszones-directory-partition Now, if i go throught the mailing list and lookup everything abotu this part. > Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password for DOM from both secrets.ldb (Could not

Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the

Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Hi to all, >> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports >> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors >> with the

Hi, This is just a report I wanted to share. Maybe someone can put it on the wiki. I created a new DC for a new site using the samba internal dns option. Later, I decided to go with bind. So I ran the command, and got this error: [root at theoden ~]# samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --verbose Reading domain information DNS accounts already exist No zone file