similar to: Clarification requested

On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 14:38 +1100, John Gardeniers wrote: > There are smb.conf items which can have multiple entries. e.g. "admin > users". I see examples showing both comma separated and whitespace > separated lists. Even our old Samba 3 conf file shows both being > used. > The man page doesn't show an example of a multiple list at all, so > that >

We're upgrading (Sernet) Samba 4.2 to 4.4. As recommended on this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba, I have upgraded one of out 2 DCs, the one that does not have any FSMO roles. We will spend the next week making sure everything works as expected. So far, so good. One thing I'm not clear on is whether I should move the FSMO roles to the upgraded DC before upgrading

Hi Andrew, I don't understand why 2 systems running the exact same version of Samba have different behaviour. Is this an option I can disable? regards, John On 19/04/16 11:29, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:29 +1000, John Gardeniers wrote: >> I'm setting up a test domain in order to try out Sudoers LDAP and >> have >> run into a problem that has

This may be off-topic, as it's only indirectly related to Samba 4 but perhaps others here have already solved this. While testing Samba 4 I've come across a rather annoying little issue when preforming an LDAP address book lookup from Thunderbird. The display name in the address book does not match the display name in ADUC. It appears that the Thunderbird address book is using the uid

It would be nice if R ignored more unicode white space characters. For example, if I have "\u2028" in a command (which I get from a line-break in keynote) I get the following error: > qplot(carat, price, data = diamonds, colour=clarity) Error: unexpected input in "qplot(carat, price, data = diamonds, ?" And occasionally have such problems when copying and pasting from

Hi, testparm -v | grep 'ldap serve' Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions ldap server require

Hi I'm trying to make sense of the macroblock coding modes in section 7.4 of the Theora spec. The text in the specification is: (d) For each consecutive macro block in coded order (cf. Section 2.4) indexed by mbi: i. If a block bi in the luma plane of macro block mbi exists such that BCODED[bi ] is 1: A. If MSCHEME is not 7, read one bit at a time until one of

We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with internal DNS and I can't find the DNS logs. Where does the Samba 4 internal DNS log queries? Thanks. regards, John

On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or > was this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get logged > at all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to locate such > logs. > > On 28/10/15 14:28, John Gardeniers wrote: >> We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with

IMHO: no real need to move FSMO before upgrading FSMO owner if no real load. FSMO are roles which make one DC different of others DC on one specific point (for each role). As long as you don't do something which requires FSMO role you won't use FSMO roles, so no matter. Things which triggers FSMO usage are modifying the schema (don't do that during upgrade), reaching RID pool limit on

Hi, I have some questions about searching with Ferret. I have a user index with first_name, last_name and full_name (which is just first plus last with a space). Here are a couple of questions: 1) If I store the fields tokenized, it appears as though queries are case-insensitive. However, for untokenized, the query is case-sensitive. How can I make the untokenized searches case-insensitive?

Has anyone here managed to get sudo working with Samba 4 AD users, using either ldap or sssd, with sssd preferred? If so, can you please point me in the direction of whatever instructions you used? It seems like there are a bunch of tutorials on the subject, each with different, and sometimes conflicting, information but none of those I've tried work for me. regards, John

Hi Rowland, I Upgraded from Samba 4.4.2 and we have tried the FQDN without success. regards, John On 21/11/16 08:02, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:42:30 +1100 > John Gardeniers via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi Louis, >> >> While it wasn't spelled out, it was firmly implied in my previous >> message that

no DNS server on that planet logs normal queries just because there si not enough disk space in most setups, there is not benefit log anything except erros and warnings for normal operations what is the problem you like to solve and if there is no problem why do you want logging normal operations? in other words: what do you try to solve except https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS Am

It took much more time than I expected, and it is currently less complete than I have hoped, but I've finaly made a first draft of the Markdown Extra spec. You can find it at <http://michelf.com/specs/markdown-extra/ > Currently, the specification defines its goals and a document model for Markdown Extra. It lacks the most important part though: the parsing section, which

Hi Rowland, Perhaps I misled you with my wording. Each user has just one email address, which was not migrated across. From where I'm sitting that looks like a very serious bug. regards, John On 31/08/15 19:07, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 31/08/15 07:27, John Gardeniers wrote: >> I've been running through a bunch of tests after migrating from >> Samba > 3 to Samba 4

Can somebody tell me why the following RegExp doesn''t work for date validation in Rails... It validates fine in RadRails -- using REgExp panel. Intended format: (mm/dd/yyyy): %r{^(0[1-9]|1[012])(-|/)(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])(-|/)(19|20)([0-9][0-9])$} If i try the following, it works in Rails: %r{(0[1-9]|1[012])(-|/)(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])} When I add the last piece, it

Probably a ld issue. It might have not run in the rpm's post script. Do a ldd /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbregistry-samba4.so /usr/lib64/samba/vfs/acl_xattr.so and check if either are reporting missing dependencies. Em 07/02/2017 21:25, John Gardeniers via samba escreveu: > This is really weird. The error below occurred for about 10 minutes after the > post-update reboot and then went

Hi Klaus, I haven't used that tool for at least 13 years but I do recall that, among other things, it read from the registry. Coupled with the fact that Samba 4 AD is not a complete implementation of AD I can't imagine that it could possibly work. More to the point, I'd be seriously concerned about the results. This is not something I'm prepared to test in a production

Hi Rowland, Thanks for the suggestion. So far, since adding 'ntlm auth' to smb.conf on the DCs we are no longer having this problem. Only time will tell if it stays working but at least I'm no longer getting complaints from the users. regards, John On 21/11/16 10:00, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:31:28 +1100 > John Gardeniers via samba <samba