similar to: idmap_ad problem and workaround

The DC's are running Windows Server 2012R2. The directory itself has RFC2307 attributes. The file servers are running FreeBSD with Samba 4.1. These are just member servers not joined as domain controllers. I have tried to upgrade to samba 4.2, and samba 4.3 as a test with no difference. Here is a peak at the smb4.conf via pastebin. http://pastebin.com/Ai14LREW Joe Maloney On Tue, Jan 26,

I have tried to add all of the above to smb4.conf with no luck. I also did a net ads leave, and net ads join. In addition I cleared the contents of /var/db/samba4. Only users who have once been granted access to domain admins will show up. I am becoming more convinced it is something at the Active Directory level. Joe Maloney On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at

On 26/01/16 18:48, Joe Maloney wrote: > Hello all, > Samba Version 4.1.21 on 8 servers as member servers configured with > idmap_ad. I have all the RFC2307 attributes configured for every user, and > group. I wrote a script to ensure that. I have scripts in place to make > sure I don't have duplicates, show users without attributes, etc. I also > filter out the users I

How can I confirm that idmap_ad is being called? I've configured Samba with --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad, built and installed it; the file ad.so is now present in /usr/local/samba/lib/ idmap/ as expected. I then added the following to smb.conf: idmap backend = tdb idmap uid = 65536 - 999999 idmap gid = 65536 - 999999 idmap config SU : backend = ad idmap config SU :

I'm unabe to use idmap_ad and sfu nss info with Samba on AIX. The configuration as it is works on a Linux build. workgroup = DOMAIN realm = DOMAIN.TLD server string = SERVER security = ADS idmap domains = DOMAIN idmap config DOMAIN:default = yes idmap config DOMAIN:backend = ad idmap config DOMAIN:range = 1000 - 60000

Is then new idmap_ad module capable of getting uid/gid info from a Windows 2003 AD pre-R2 with RFC2307 Unix Identity Mapping Extensions applied? Also, is the correct syntax for specifying the schema_mode as follows: idmap config dom.example.com:schema_mode = rfc2307 (I am not confident that I am reading the idmap_ad manpage and the new idmap document correctly.) Thanks for the help, Murthy

>It's probably worth noting that for users who are >adding idmap_ad over an existing winbind setup, the >old mapping has to be deleted as above. Thanks, I'll put this in the README for the next version. regards, -- Luke --

Some empirical testing shows that if I am using the idmap_ad module the template homedir parameter in smb.conf is ignored. I would just like to determine if this is the correct behaviour or if I am doing something wrong. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom.

Hi 4.1.11 no longer includes the idmap_ad module in a default ./configure. This has caught out at least two list users recently. We think it is important enough to reinstate as default. Anyone with us? Especially those whose task it will be to have to tell users via the list of the change. . . Cheers, Steve

I've been noticing that group policies in OU's haven't been working for me. So far I've installed samba 4.1.4 on a fresh install of FreeBSD 10.0 with UFS + acls turned on with the only shares being sysvol, and netlogon. I can get Windows 7 machines to take policies that are in the root of my domain. If I create an OU move a computer or user to that OU and move the policy to that

I'm interested in using samba4 in a production environment that has multiple locations tied together via a WAN. In order to do so I need to figure out what is the absolute most stable and supported path. I found this email thread here stating samba4 ad roles, and file server roles should be on separate servers. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mailing.unix.samba/QySoM_uGGL8 Can

I have two boxes on which I am trying to get idmap_ad (from xad_oss_plugins) to provide uid/gid mapping, and am getting the error: "Could not convert sid <sid of some_user> to uid" The story so far goes like this: Without the line "idmap backend = ad:ldap://<PDC's FQDN>/" in smb.conf, I can successfully do all of: #> wbinfo -S $(wbinfo -n some_user | awk

I'm trying to get my linux boxes to authenticate to AD using winbind. I need to get my uid's from AD so I'm using idmap_ad. I got to the point where 'getent passwd' shows me the list of unix users from AD with all correct details, however when I do 'getent passwd <username>' for any username from the list returned by 'getent passwd' I get an empty reply

It would be a handy feature to have idmap_ad implement an alloc routine to write back the uid and gid mappings to AD either as SFU attributes or RFC 2307 attributes. I figure this could allow dynamic uid and gid allocation that can be easily preserved across multiple domains in a Windows environment. Has there been any attempt to provide this feature? Ross S. W. Walker Information Systems

I note from the man pages, that idmap_ad will only map users/groups IF you set the UIDnumber in the active directory. In lookin in my active directory, there is a "Unix Attributes" tab with "UID" in that tab that you can set. There is also and "Attributes Editor" tap where you can look at all attributes and edit the "UIDnumber" I just want to verify that

Hello from Germany, I have a problem with the following constellation: A Samba-Fileserver - Samba 3.5.6 - running in a Windows AD as a member server using idmap_ad for the mapping the User-IDs. This all works fine as long as the LDAP-port 389 is available on the domain controllers. Now, our AD admin wants to close this and move over to LDAPS. And here is my problem. How do I configure my Samba

Greetings samba community, I am running samba version: Version 3.5.11-79. fc14. Trying to join linux servers to the windows 2003 domain by running winbind and smb. I have configured the following smb.conf file which worked but can't seem to understand why the uid is different from the windows side when the windows side has already mapped some kind of uid to the sid. If i were to log

Dear list, upgrading from SLES11 SP1 to SLES11 SP2, I upgraded Samba from 3.4.3 to 3.6.3. I was successfully using idmap_ad to authenticate users but after the upgrade it stopped working and users are not seen by the OS. Obviously the users I want to see on the Linux server have all RFC2307 attributes populated and are seen by all other SLES11 SP1 servers. I checked everything (I know) from the

I'm testing winbind 3.3.1-1ubuntu1 (jaunty) and my user stored in AD is consistently being returned with a UID of 1000, rather than 10031, which is whats stored in LDAP/AD under uidNumber. If I install the 3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 packages from intrepid, 'id bryanm' correctly returns 10031, but when upgrading back to 3.3.1-1ubuntu1, I get the wrong UID again. I did an install from source as

On 29/04/2019 21:12, Joe Maloney wrote: > With CFT version you chose to build, and package individual components such as sendmail with a port option. That does entirely solve the problem of being able to reinstall sendmail after the fact without a rebuild of the userland (base) port but perhaps base flavors could solve that problem assuming flavors could extend beyond python. This sounds very