similar to: Roaming Profiles acls after upgrade

Dear Mark, It looks like you are trying to do the same as I did. Did you read the thread I had some days ago with subject "How to copy roaming profiles to new server ? ("Group policy client service failed. The logon access is denied")" ? This could help you. Other suggestions : Not sure if [profiles.V2] is still required but maybe you should try to add it ? We also

I'm configuring a new samba 4.1 server with NT4 style domain. I've copied most of the configuration from our working 3.6 server, making some changes as needed for the newer samba version. So far, I have been unable to get roaming profiles to work. It seems like the users cannot write in the profiles directory, but I don't see why not. Here is the relevant part of smb.cond [global]

On 10/12/2016 1:34 PM, Mark Nienberg via samba wrote: > Well, the easy fix is to add this to the share definition: > > admin users = "@STA\domain admins" > > The wiki implies that this should not be necessary, so I don't know if the > wiki is wrong or if I failed to follow it correctly. This was my first > share using Windows ACLS and it was an interesting

On 10/12/2016 7:32 PM, Mark Nienberg wrote: > Yes, it looks like this: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles#Profile_share_using_Windows_ACLs > > but as I say, it works now that I have added the admin users, so I am > satisfied for now. > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:31 AM, lingpanda101--- via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > have you given Domain Admins the required rights ? > > net rpc rights grant DOMAIN\\"Domain Admins" > SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -UAdministrator > Yes. I followed this wiki example: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs Here is some output: [nienberg at

Yes, it looks like this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles#Profile_share_using_Windows_ACLs but as I say, it works now that I have added the admin users, so I am satisfied for now. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:31 AM, lingpanda101--- via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 10/12/2016 1:34 PM, Mark Nienberg via samba wrote: > >> Well, the

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Mark Nienberg < mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Trenta sis via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> We have detected that machines with dhcp (It was configured as is >> described >> in samba wiki dhcp and samba 4) are updating correclty and any message >>

Sorry I should have said in my original post, this server is a NT4 style domain server. Looking in /var/log/samba I see log files with the machine names in the file names, so samba definitely knows the machine names. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ricky Nance <ricky.nance at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mark, I think (and I may be wrong here, so if a dev sees this correct me) >

I've set up a profiles share according to the wiki article: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles Users are able to create new roaming profiles and they cannot browse each others' profiles, so all that is working. The only issue is that the group "domain admins" does not have privileges to read or delete user profiles. The acls on the profiles directory

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:19:09 -0700 Mark Nienberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I've set up a profiles share according to the wiki article: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles > > Users are able to create new roaming profiles and they cannot browse > each others' profiles, so all that is working. The only issue is that >

In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: Samba version 4.1.1 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2482 john Everyone 10.0.0.109 (ipv4:10.0.0.109:49178) 7364 george Everyone 10.0.0.60 (ipv4:10.0.0.60:49232) In Samba 3.6 it was like this: Samba version 3.6.24 PID

Mark, I think (and I may be wrong here, so if a dev sees this correct me) smbstatus works with sockets. With that being said, I don't think it has been updated to work with samba as an AD DC, but should still work fine on other configurations (member server, legacy DC, etc). If you are running with a non ad dc config, let us know, there may be a bug there. Ricky On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:12

Well, I created a bug report for this issue. Seems that none of the developers has picked up on it. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214 On 16 January 2018 at 19:47, Mark Nienberg <mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:34 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> I have

I'm testing dovecot as a replacement for an aging UW-IMAP server. I have the basic IMAP setup working but I'm stuck on public folders (which my users are addicted to). I set up public folders generally a described in the wiki. The problem is that when a user creates a new public folder, the folder is owned by the user with permissions drwx------ which prevents other users from

Hello everyone! I'm facing a big problem with the samba server I just set up: System: FreeBSD 5.4 Samba ver: 3.0.20 (previuosly 3.0.12) Client(s): Windows XP Professional I configured the server to make use of roaming profiles. I was able to copy local profiles to the server, to login and voila - got my desktop. Also after creating a new user, the new profile gets copied to the server,

Hello there. I´ve been having problems with dynamic dns update by dhcp on my samba ADDC running on CentOS 7 on an RPI2. After a while, the dhccp_dyndns.sh stops stops being able to authenticate with named. for the longest time I was stumped with this, exploring all kinds of kerberos issues, but found out that *restartint* named did resolve the issue. I have finally traced this problem down to a

Hello, I try to set up a shared maildir with symbolink links, but it doesn't work. The main user, from which I would share a mailbox, creates a mailbox named "Commun" with thunderbird. I see on the file system from the server that a directory .Commun is created in his ~/Maildir/ and that the file ~/Maildir/.subscriptions has now such an entry. Right. In ~/Maildir/Commun the

I had the same problem. We used samba 3.0.14 and upgraded to 3.0.20 After that profile were not loaded anymore. Th problen you are discribing looks like Windows is loading the local copy of your profile and after you deleted it it tries to load the profile from samba and fails. I found out that we had problems with "profile acls = Yes" wich was needed by the earlier samba releases.

(2005.10.10, 14:25) I am running Samba 3.0.14a-2 on Fedora 4. I have no problem seeing the Linux file system from any of the Windows (2000, SP4) computers attached to the network. The problem is that smbd processes are created for no apparent reason and never die. I noticed this when the computer had been up for about three days and there were some 600 active smbd processes! What could be the

Hi I'm sure this must have come up before - if so I apologise. I have googled, read HOWTOs FAQ and numerous personal accounts on how to configure samba as a PDC but to no avail - neither w2k nor XP will join the domain. NT4 Workstation and Win9x I have working fine - where have I gone wrong ? Linux SETUP: RedHat 7.3, samba-2.2.7-3.7.3 (upgraded from 2.2.3a) Win2k SETUP: Win 2000 Pro,