similar to: Snipe-IT ldap integration / Create read only user

On 1/25/2016 4:37 PM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 25/01/16 19:37, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm able to successfully authenticate Snipe-IT against Samba. >> However looking through the documentation for the ldap config. >> >> http://docs.snipeitapp.com/manual/user-management/index.html >> >> I see LDAP Bind Username

Le 26/01/2016 14:09, Rowland penny a écrit : > > In which case it is easy, especially as the page you linked to has > 'Example' above the user DN you posted. > Using your favourite way of creating AD users, create a user, that's > it! The user will have read-only access to AD and read/write access to > its own AD object. > > You should be aware that the

Hi Simon, thanks for your quick reply. 1) ... so you can reproduce this? 2) Do you know a way how this can be 'foreseen'? We allocate larger matrices in the copula package depending on the user's input dimension. It would be good to tell her/him "Your dimension is quite large. Be aware of killers in your neighborhood"... before the killer attacks. Thanks & cheers,

Hi, I am testing Google's recent ability to integrate Chromebooks into AD and it's failing when I try to join the device to the domain. When I run wireshark during the test I notice 2 TGS-REQs from the device that are answered with KRB5KDC_ERR_ETYPE_NOSUPP. The Chromebook is only passing AES256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 and AES128-cts-hmac-sha1-96 as enc types. I was getting the same result from

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 14.48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > > The cure is to STOP your windows clients trying to update their own > records. Yes, this is true, on windows I will stop this service. But my problem now is another The samba command samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately not work It's possible to resolve this

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:57:15 +0100 Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 16.00 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba ha > scritto: > > The samba command > > > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > > > not work > > > Following this howto, >

I ran both scripts last night and was able to get the Chromebook to join the domain this morning. Thanks, Achim! For posterity's sake, I should mention that I changed the user's password when I enabled AES on their Account tab, in ADUC. Thanks, Mike On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Achim Gottinger via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Mike, > > Can be you

On 06/22/2016 02:44 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > Why is is when I do a getfacl I do not see the mapping of BUILTIN like > others? do you have winbind in /etc/nsswitch.conf? mj

Hello, I'm using Samba 4.5.1 as a ADDC and the internal DNS. If I use 'allow dns updates = secure' in my smb.conf. Only A records update. The applicable reverse zone fails to update. If I switch to using non secure updates both the A and the PTR records are updated. Is someone else able to confirm this behavior? Thanks. -- - James

Hello, I upgrade the schema for our main ADDC and everything works properly, but the member DC (DC to an Existing AD) fails. Both servers are in version 4.10.2 Distro: Debian 9.8 *Main ADDC:* [2019/04/16 15:43:03.814846, 0] ../../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:2919(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsGetNCChanges) ../../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:2919: DsGetNCChanges 2nd replication

Hello, I set up a domain with two DCs (dns-backend is BIND9_DLZ) on a Debian 10 system. I used either the Debian-packages or the Packages from Louis (4.12.8). I created an Ansible-role to setup everything, starting from installing the packages over doing the provision/join up to change the settings for bind9. The first DC runs fine. After the reboot services are all present, allthe SRV Record for

Hi, I'm trying to set up an AD DC in an iocage jail on FreeBSD (to avoid the issues of having the DC a file server) but I'm running into some trouble. I've setup Kerberos and can kinit OK: root at samba-addc:/ # kinit administrator administrator at BEGER.COM.AU's Password: root at samba-addc:/ # klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at

I have setup on Fedora 27 server a AD-DC samba server + bind + dhcp. All seem work fine: I can join to domain, add/remove dns records with samba-tools, access to shared folder, use MS Management Console on Win7, ecc But when I join a new machine Samba winbind Member server to domain [ root at server-dati ~]# net ads join DOGMA-TO -U administrator Using short domain name --

It's me again :-) Now we have DDNS with DHCP running but we have a problem on one of our two DCs. Btw we used the setup and the script from wiki. Doing a "dhclient" on a host we are getting the following messages: ------------- Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: Commit: IP: 192.168.0.249 DHCID: 1:50:5b:5d:1c:ab:aa Name: horst Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: execute_statement

On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 06:56:32 +1300 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 13:17 -0400, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > > On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > > > Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > > > > >

Hi, Interesting "feature" in 10.11.4. I wonder if the process is killed before or after malloc() returns. If before, it seems very blunt: "You're asking too much and I don't like it so I kill you now". If after it doesn't look much better: "You're asking a lot and I don't like it but I give it to you anyway. I'll kill you quickly later". Why

Hello all I have set up a Debian etch server with a samba and ldap integration. domain master = yes domain logons = yes os level = 33 preferred master = yes local master = yes passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost/ ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=test,dc=net ldap suffix =dc=test,dc=net ldap user suffix = ou=users ldap machine suffix = ou=machines ldap group

We would like to use samba 4.x as our ADDC and also as an ldap source for authentication. Google apps can use an ldap server as a source for users and groups. There seems to be plenty of use of AD as a ldap server for this purpose. I wanted to check to see if anyone has used samba 4 running as an ADDC as an authentication server for other services that can consume ldap. -- David Bear mobile:

> > If you run getent passwd administrator on a DC, you should get > something like this: > root at dc1:~# getent passwd administrator > SAMDOM\administrator:*:0:10000::/home/administrator:/bin/bash On my DC getent passwd administrator show nothing. :( Is it necessary to map the root user to ADDC as well? There is however a gotcha, on any domain > joined windows machine there

On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: >> I have seen you state this before that "server services" line within a >> smb.conf file is not necessary on a DC. >> >> I have to ask, and it may have been asked before but, I recently install >> from source the