similar to: Windows 10 administrative templates /central store with Samba

Viktor, thanks again! Now that I did this (added the Win10 1511 ADMX files to the central store), I probably will have to recreate the policies that will be applied to Win10 machines, right? Ole On 21.01.2016 17:16, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > I've been using Samba with Win10 clients for a while now, so I'm happy > to share some of my findings. > > See

On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't > think that's necessary. I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7 only, so far. Therefore I believe that e.g. the Windows Update policy is not fit for

On 21.01.2016 15:51, James wrote: > On 1/21/2016 9:39 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> This might or might not be a Samba related post. Feel free to ignore >> it in case it is too far off-topic >> >> My current understanding is that ... >> a) I need those new templates in order to fully integrate Win10 >> clients in an AD domain (i.e.

Hi, I have a problem with GPO editing. I have some GPO first created with RSAT and GPO editor on Win 7 x64. I have modified recently this object with RSAT and GPO editor on Win 10 x64 . If I try to edit the GPO back to Win7 I got the following error (in french): La ressource ? $(string.SiteDiscoveryEnableWMI) ? r?f?renc?e dans l?attribut displayName est introuvable. Fichier

Hi Ole, Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't think that's necessary. The main benefit you have with the central store is that you now *can edit* GPOs with Win10-only-rules also on non-Win10-computers. It does not, however, affect how the client implements the GPO. Viktor On 25.01.2016 12:36, Ole Traupe wrote: > Viktor, thanks again! > > Now

On 25.01.2016 17:04, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> Hi Ole, >> >> Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't >> think that's necessary. > > I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 > clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7

Hi Ole, I've been using Samba with Win10 clients for a while now, so I'm happy to share some of my findings. See comments inline. On 21.01.2016 15:39, Ole Traupe wrote: > Hi list, > > This might or might not be a Samba related post. Feel free to ignore > it in case it is too far off-topic > > My current understanding is that ... > a) I need those new templates in

Commented inbetween. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ole Traupe > Verzonden: donderdag 21 januari 2016 15:40 > Aan: samba > Onderwerp: [Samba] Windows 10 administrative templates /central store with > Samba > > Hi list, > > This might or might not be a Samba related post. Feel free to ignore it >

On 1/21/2016 9:39 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > Hi list, > > This might or might not be a Samba related post. Feel free to ignore > it in case it is too far off-topic > > My current understanding is that ... > a) I need those new templates in order to fully integrate Win10 > clients in an AD domain (i.e. with compatible policies). > b) I can only modify policies based on

Hello, everyone. After some windows 10 client join to our samba AD DC. A lot of setting is missing in the windows 10 PCs. so I need to import some windows 10 Administrative Templates to samba dc like that: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/3087759/how-to-create-and-manage-the-central-store-for-group-policy-administra Unfortunately, I didn't see any dir named

Viktor, reading your original post again, I find that the "Primary Domain Suffix" there is given as "SAMDOM.COM" while you claim that your domain name actually has the form of "samdom.example.com". Is this a typo, or does this actually differ? I am asking, because you can (at least in Win7) - in the system properties right where you give the domain name for the

On 27.10.2015 09:05, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 26/10/15 22:35, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >> On 26.10.2015 23:03, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 26/10/15 21:38, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> I joined a Samba AD member server (file server) to a Samba AD DC. >>>> This seems to have worked. However, if I try to access the file >>>>

On 27.10.2015 11:17, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/10/15 09:34, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >> On 27.10.2015 09:05, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 26/10/15 22:35, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26.10.2015 23:03, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 26/10/15 21:38, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>>>>

On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> See replies below >>>> >>>> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 16/11/15 11:19,

On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >> >> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >> objects after the 'leave'? >> >> Ole >> > > Yes, first and only. As I said, it's more or less a lab setup

I have an AD with 1 Samba DC and 5 Windows 10 clients. The DC and the clients all have a fixed IPv4 address. In the windows event viewer, I constantly see the following warning: Event 8019, DNS Client Events ------------------------------------------ The system failed to register host (A or AAA) resource records (RRs) for network adapter with settings: Adapter Name: {someGUID} Host Name:

On 27.10.2015 12:38, Rowland Penny wrote: > See inline comments: > > On 27/10/15 11:17, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >> On 27.10.2015 11:17, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 27/10/15 09:34, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27.10.2015 09:05, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 26/10/15 22:35, Viktor Trojanovic

I was experiencing problems with Group Policy Objects. The Windows Event Viewer spits out so many different errors, most of them less than helpful, so Iwas seeking help here with some of those messages. In the end, and after many hours and even days of researching this problem, I seem to have pin-pointed the main issue to some simple permission irregularities that I don't know how to

So only for old NT4 style PDC - BDC environment one needs poledit. While AD's (with virtual pdc role servers) can use the MMC.? We got a pure Samba AD environment and thus it should work. Be it that we might not have all mmc templates (not yet checked that). Thanks Viktor. -----Original message----- From: Viktor Trojanovic?<viktor at troja.ch> Sent: Wednesday 21st October 2020

Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: > > > On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> See replies below >> >> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 16/11/15 11:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> So I ran a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck, and the following error >>>> message came up: >>>>