similar to: running DCs with 4.2 and 4.3 at the same time

Hello, Am 07.01.2016 um 16:41 schrieb mj: > Is it all right to upgrade one DC to 4.3, while keeping the other two on > 4.2 for a few days, to first see how things work out? > > The question is: do I need to upgrade all DCs together, on a large > version jump, such as 4.2 to 4.3. There was no database change between 4.2 and 4.3. So it should be OK to have a mixed DC environment.

Hi, I would like to ask how exactly the "password server =" smb.conf option works. The man pages say that the option is to "restrict Samba to to do all its username/password validation using a specific remote server" I know that we should normally leave it empty, to have samba auto-discover the DCs. But my question is: Suppose it's defined it like: > password

It's very difficult at least. I can't instantly think any sensible way forward, but you might be able to get somewhere using %a variable. Aki > On December 31, 2016 at 11:38 AM mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible? > > (or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody

Or. maybe it is the holidays and people actually have a life? On December 31, 2016 4:38:53 AM EST, mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: >Hi, > >Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible? > >(or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody bothers to point it >out..?) > >MJ > >On 12/29/2016 09:23 PM, mj wrote: >> Hi, >>

On 10/16/2017 11:13 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:53:17 +0200 > mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am >> trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done >> >> ldbedit -e nano -H

Hi! You can ignore it, or you can change the socket permissions to 0666. service stats { unix_listener stats-writer { mode = 0666 } } Aki > On 23/10/2020 17:52 mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Nobody? > > It happens so rarely, and the system appears to be running fine > otherwise, should I just ignore it? > > Still

On 03/21/2018 10:34 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > The question is does it allow remote users to login with no password? Yes, and the answer is: no. > If not, then the message ie nearly notification that login without a password is potentially possible. Yes, but a worrying one. That's why i decided to post here. > I have no idea why you would have nopassword=y set in the first place, so it

Hi, I would like to have two seperate imap listeners, with different authentication settings, but the mailstore and userbase etc will be identical. I know I can do this: > service imap-login { > inet_listener imap { > port = 143 > } > inet_listener imap2 { > port = 144 > } > } But I'm unsure how to configure imap/143 with "driver =

Hi Jeremy, list, On 06/26/2016 12:11 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > We should probably have something in the server that logs > this as an official "event". Can someone log a RFE bug in > the bugzilla so we don't forget this request ? I created this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11998 I hope it is (approximately) what you mean. :-) Best regards, MJ

Hi, To make our AD more robust, I'd like to provide more than one dns forwarder, like for example: dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 However, this seems to break dns resolution completely (and without logging errors in the logs!): # Host test.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) With only one forwarder things work: $ test.com has address 208.64.121.161 Am I really allowed to specify only one

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/jj631606.aspx goes through the steps I remember taking in a windows environment. As you can see step 2 is to install ADFS this is what would need emulated with some web server. So I will try and google ADFS on apache or nginx or linux. I'll let you know if I find anything interesting. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski

On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:14:45 +0200 mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Nobody knows..? > > Or my question is unclear..? > OK, whilst it is recomended to use 'password server = *' you can use a list of servers instead. I personally do not see the point of setting it as you are proposing, surely it is just the same as using '*' ? I am also

Hi James, Thanks for the quick reply. On 10/09/2017 08:52 PM, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > You should be able to fix the 'replPropertyMetaData' errors with; > > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes > 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' Yep, worked great! Fixed all of those replPropertyMetaData errors! :-) > The highwatermark doesn't necessarily

Hi, On 25/05/2020 23:04, Voytek wrote: > jumping here with a question, if I use 143 with STARTTLS, and, force > TLS/SSL in configuration, that's equivalent from security POV, isn't > it? and, same for 110 STARTTLS? Or am I missing something? Interesting point, after some googling, I think you are right, and as long as we have set "disable_plaintext_auth = yes" (and we

Hi, On 07/31/2016 04:36 PM, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > We are discussing about making ce repos at some point. This would probably help some people. > > Aki We're following this thread with interest. What exactly is a "ce repository"? (google doesn't help) MJ

None of my computers have a UID/GID and my GPO works fine. Add the line i suggested to the share, and setup your rights Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens mourik jan c > heupink > Verzonden: dinsdag 17 november 2015 18:55 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Permission Issues with

Hi Andrew and Louis, Found the issue: after rsync-ing the sysvol from our old decommissioned DCs, the sysvolreset/sysvolcheck DO work out. I tried to keep the things simple first, by NOT immediately importing our old sysvol contents, but first check with a default sysvol... I thought that the sysvolreset would just reset whatever is located under samba/sysvol, but I guess that it reads the

Ho Mourik Thanks for your reply, any other attribute which we can duplicate? Br. Umar On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:47 PM, mourik jan heupink - merit < heupink at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > In AD, the attribute mail can only exist once. > > MJ > > On 01/23/2015 05:27 AM, Umar Draz wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> I am tying to create a user in SAMBA 4

> Le 29 mai 2020 ? 11:17, Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> a ?crit : > > On 2020-05-26, mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 25/05/2020 23:04, Voytek wrote: >>> jumping here with a question, if I use 143 with STARTTLS, and, force >>> TLS/SSL in configuration, that's equivalent from security POV, isn't

I used to also get related log messages of the form: auth_check_password_send: Checking password for unmapped user [HPRS]\[mark]@[ROVER] auth_check_password_send: mapped user is: [HPRS]\[mark]@[ROVER] but now all I get is the auth_check_password_recv in the log. Perhaps the change is due to an upgrade to Samba, or perhaps a change I made to my smb.conf log options? (see log config in my