similar to: replication fails after internal error 11 / panic

Hai MJ, ( gelukkig nieuwjaar he .. ;-) ) First, why sernet 4.2.5 current is 4.2.7 Upgrade to 4.2.7 first i suggest. And : Last attempt @ Wed Nov 11 <= 11 Nov ? latest really? The "misbehaving server" check the time first. Try to run : knit Administrator samba-tool drs replicate <destinationDC> <sourceDC> --full-sync -k reboot your server, check time, check

The two systems I'm referring to are on different domains, different locations. No connection whatsoever except me being the one administering both. According to oEMInformation the server was provisioned by 4.3.3. I just checked the Samba log file and it seems that version 4.7.4 was running before the update. I'm now looking at the logs right before the upgrade and indeed, there have

Greetings, I recently upgraded Samba on an Ubuntu 14.04.2 server from version 4.1.9 to 4.2.3. Upon rebooting Samba process goes into a running state then after a short time it will go into an uninterruptible state. If I check the log.samba, it appears that it is attempting to start, then hangs at the following: [2016/06/23 15:16:00.329503, 3] ../source4/param/share.c:124(share_register)

Let's see I've got a network about 10 PCs running XP and 1 running Linux. I had setup Samba and it was running like a charm. XP pcs could access linux box through network neighborhood and access 2 shared dir and edit/change files. Really not sure what has gone wrong. I am using Samba 2.2.8a I run both smbd and nmbd as daemons. When I run ps -aux they show up. root 1553 0.0

Hello. I've got a network of FreeBSD servers which traditionally hosted a classic domain. I upgraded some months ago, removing the old PDC and BDC and migrating to an AD DC controller in a jail. This is working fine with Samba 4.4.13. Now I'm trying to add a second DC, so I created a new jail on another physical server and went on with the setup, following: >

Am 13.03.19 um 13:25 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > My DC1 is named "PRE01SVDEB02" > and DC2 = "PRE01SVDEB03" checked for resolv.conf and DNS-pointers again. made sure that all 3 FQDNs (2 DCs, one DM) resolve from the servers. showrepl is happy again on DC1, but still fails on/to DC2 hm manual replicate: no progress or success visible (either from DC1 or

Greetings drama queen Stefan.... ;-) hehe :-)) Yes, wait.. Or reboot DC1, wait 5-10 min reboot DC2, wait 5-10 min. The waiting can be shorter is the AD is not so big. I suggest you have a look at this. (Rowland, look away... ;-)) A sample for a systemd setup, i'm working towards Debian Buster now, see : https://release.debian.org/ [2019-Mar-12] Bits from the Release Team: Debian 10

Hi all, I've been running Samba 4.1.6 in production for 2 weeks now and it's been great. However I noticed a huge security flaw today that I hit only once. I access Samba4 shares over the VPN that is irrelevant since the security access is user-based, not IP based. What happens right after the connection, Windows tries to read the shares and some are empty, but they are not supposed to

We have a Samba4 AD DC running on an Ubuntu 14.04 VM [ smb.conf ] # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MEADORANDCO realm = meadorandco.com netbios name = SOGO server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 192.168.121.1 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes passdb backend = samba allow dns updates = nonsecure

Hi, I have a CentOS 6.4 box running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC replicating from a W2k3 box. If I run "gpresult /s OLDDC /user MYDOM\Me" on a command prompt on OLDDC, I get a normal output, listing which GPOs are applied. If I run "gpresult /s NEWDC /user MYDOM\Me" in the same place, I get "ERROR: The RPC server is unavailable." This is after a fresh restart

Looking at the Windows Server Event Viewer, I find this error: The Remote Desktop license server could not be registered as a service connection point in Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS). Ensure that there is network connectivity between the license server and AD DS. To register the license server as a service connection point in AD DS, use Review Configuration in the RD Licensing

I was too quick to send my previous email. It can't really be a problem of the package since I have, as mentioned, another system with the exact same setup and the exact same package versions and it all works there... On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 11:18, Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Yes, I tried running dbcheck (see first email), it showed 0 errors from > the start, I

I could really use some support with this. I understand it's always possible to just restore from a backup but the more interesting question is if something can be done with the data at hand. Basically, I'm trying to understand how it's possible that a dbcheck shows no errors, an ldbsearch is successful, and yet it's not possible to start the AD properly. What else is there that

Hello there, I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 and dc2. Distribution: Debian 8.5 Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH". Because the message "BAD_NETPATH" I checked the DNS-resolution:

I have an issue where at odd times, maybe after 3 days, maybe after a week, people suddenly cant do domain logons. Unfortunately the machine is 50km away so i'm sure theres more details I can glean once I can interogate the users a bit more. Things I have noticed: Anyone currently logged in can still work fine. A restart of samba fixes the issue (till it hapens next). ps ax shows smbd and

Try : apt-get remove libbsd-dev restart samba, now is the message gone? Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens BasSamba via > samba > Verzonden: woensdag 15 maart 2017 16:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] samba: setproctitle not initialized, please either call >

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:13 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you simply try to modify type=forking to type=notify and test again? > Perhaps your old has disappeared (they do sometimes, not often enough)... Seems to work for starting smbd and nmbd (although Type=forking has been running flawlessly for many months) on my Gentoo system. In my Debian LXC

We have 3 ADCs based on Samba-4.7.4 (compiled from source,internal DNS)/ CentOS7: dcdo1,dcnh1 and dcge1. dcge1 holds all FSMO roles. The 3 ADCs are on different locations connected via IPSec based VPN. No traffic is filtered out. All 3 ADCs replicate fine except dcdo1 -->dcnh1. Symptom: [root at dcdo1 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dcnh1.ad.kdu.com dcdo1.ad.kdu.com dc=ad,dc=kdu,dc=com

Am 23.08.2016 um 15:36 wrote Heinz Allerberger via samba: > Hello there, > > I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 > and dc2. > Distribution: Debian 8.5 > Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 > > The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. > But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH".

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sven > Schwedas via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 16:44 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debugging Samba is a total PITA and > this needs to improve > > On 21.05.19 16:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > >> Since Cyrus