similar to: Windows 10 SysVol and GPO problems

I've been running Samba 4 in NT4 Domain mode for a few years, and it's been working fine with Windows 7 PCs. I now need to join a new Windows 10 PC to the domain, but I'm not having any success! When I try to join the domain, the Windows 10 PC says "An Active Directory Domain Controller could not be contacted...." I've tried a few things, including:- Setting

Dear Rowland, Thanks a lot for your anwswer ! Le 2017-10-17 20:16, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 > "Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : >> > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet >> > support except in the

The issue does not seem to be connected to SMB1. It can be installed and it still won't authenticate. Something has been changed to force authentication to AD/DNS either solely or as a first step. The translation of the netbios name never happens even if the computer can resolve the name. Given that the authentication thru netbios resolution seems to get grandfathered in provided the domain

Hopefully this is a simple problem for a guru to solve. I have been installing Centos / Samba servers for my clients since 2004. However, in almost every instance, the linux machine has been the only server on site. To begin with I set up the server as a domain server but as most of my customers have less than a dozen PCs on a single site, the domain seemed to be an overkill so I now tend to use

Folks I have a Centos7 system (SOFA) and want to install a Samba share named "STUFF" for the machines inside my home. All users in my home have read access to the share, but only one user "me" has write permission. The configuration below worked just fine when the Samba system was on Centos 6, but did not work under Centos 7. The client machine is Windows 10. I have

Given an existing NT4 Samba 4 DC, a recently upgraded Win10 machine can no longer access NETLOGON to authenticate to the network. This lead to the research revealing that my Samba4 PDC SMB.CONF must be changed to limit MAX PROTOCOL = NT1 to avoid negotiating a version of SMB2 from Win10 that Samba4 can't resolve. Doing this broke authentication via other resources that no longer support NT1,

Hello We have a problem with our Windows 10 Clients. Installed on a SLES12 Server is samba v4.4 I can bind the clients to the domain without any problem. Afterwards I want to login in the domain, I get the error, no logonserver available I can change in the smb conf max protocol to NT1 -> now it is possible to login with user xxx in the domain We don't want to use our samba server

I have a pretty simply home LAN with a Linux box (Mandrake 9.1) and 2 XP boxes. The workgroup is named UNIVERSE and the machines are earth (Linux), voyager (XP) and starbase (XP). (smb.conf has security=user). Voyager can browse over to \\earth\share no problem. Recently I connected starbase to my LAN using a wireless router. When on starbase I cannot browse to \\earth\share. When I do so I

Good morning Chris > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sonic [mailto:sonicsmith at gmail.com] > Verzonden: dinsdag 27 oktober 2020 21:07 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO fail and sysvol perm errors > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:01 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git? The only other

I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git? The only other

Hi, a year ago i installed corsair flash voyager utility with wine. This is the encryption tool for a corsair usb-stick, that runs only under windows, but i hoped, i could use it with ubuntu and wine. But it didn't work. So i tried to uninstall it. But i can't get rid of it. Even now, with Hardy heron 8.04 and the newest update for wine, i can't uninstall corsair flash voyager

GPO's fail to apply on Windows clients and sysvol permission errors are logged. DC is Samba 4.13.0 created via a classic upgrade. Logged sysvol errors (uid 5025 is the system I ran gpupdate on, don't know what uid 3000011 refers to): =================================== Oct 25 12:17:09 srvr01 smbd[3762]: [2020/10/25 12:17:09.695062, 0]

Hello. Is there a way to start Gpo startup scripts using logged user? i can see that startup scripts working from root, yes there is option run_as (which somehow dont work) but this is not what i need, i dont want to create GPO for every user. i need gpo that will start script from user that just logged it, not root.

> It's needed after every GPO addition and edit. There must be a root > cause to hunt down somewhere. Or is it a bug in 4.13.0 ? Yes, and no. Yes, its a bug. No, in my opionion its an old setting thats just needs some updating. Try this. samba-tool ntacl set "O:LAG:BAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;BA)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;SO)(A;OICI;0x001f01

This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately. This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- arch/i386/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/i386/kernel/smp.c

This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately. This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- arch/i386/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/i386/kernel/smp.c

On 4/18/23 4:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > I think what you are saying is this, using oddjob-gpupdate replaces > the 'apply group policies = yes' line in smb.conf > > Anderson compiled oddjob-gpupdate and it didn't work using sssd, but > the same basic setup on the OS using winbind did. > > As far as I can see, oddjob-gpupdate or 'apply group

On 17/04/2023 15:47, David Mulder via samba wrote: > On 4/14/23 2:23 AM, Anderson Sampaio Mello via samba wrote: >> Hello Samba Team, how are you? >> >> I'm joining linux clients in the company's environment and I would >> like to >> apply GPOs to linux clients, I'm in the testing phase. >> >> I'm testing with ubuntu clients version

Not strictly asterisk related, however... Here's an odd one for you.. I got a Nokia E90 and setup it's SIP client which runs via Wi-Fi (anyone know if I can make it work via GPRS/3G?) Anyway, in a fit of idleness, I thought I'd see what codecs it supports, as I couldn't find it in the manual... And it supports: ilbc g729 ulaw/alaw No GSM! How odd is that, given