similar to: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature

hehehe Thank you for your attention. Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be presented here. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba Application patch, exemple.... Bye!! Em 09-12-2015 12:11, L.P.H. van Belle escreveu: > Sorry none.. > > I suggest first upgrade to the latest 4.3.x > If it is still there, post again, but with some

Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki? Thanks Em 09-12-2015 13:47, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > Am 09.12.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> hehehe >> Thank you for your attention. >> Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be >> presented here. >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba

Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the samba, I use the method described it to upgrade my Samba 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba Em 09-12-2015 14:07, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki? > > Wiki? > how did you install

Ok, my installation was build following the official wiki Samba using OS like Ubuntu 14:04. Still the question remains how do I update the package? Following the wiki (I spent in another email) or otherwise? Thanks Em 09-12-2015 14:33, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the

In short, I follow what ja think I was telling to UPGRADE follow the Wiki(which is was the same as you gave me) My samba has been updated from version 4.2 to 4.3(used wiki), so said he was running since August. Thank you very much for your attention. Bye Em 09-12-2015 15:01, Reindl Harald escreveu: > > > Am 09.12.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: >> Ok, my installation

Hello guys. When checking the Samba status, an error is displayed. This error was displayed after upgrading from version 4.7.5 to version 4.7.7 I've reviewed everything and found nothing wrong. Anyone have any idea what it is? *Mai 14 08:54:47 XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM <http://XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM> samba[14480]: [2018/05/14 08:54:47.676288, 0]

Am 09.12.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: > Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki? Wiki? how did you install samba? if i installed from a package i would just write a bugreport when my distribution stays on a x.0 release and when i build my own packages, well, download tarball, edit the version number in the SPEC-file and just fire rpmbuild > Em 09-12-2015 13:47,

Am 09.12.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: > hehehe > Thank you for your attention. > Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be > presented here. > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba > > Application patch, exemple.... 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 don't need any special examples becaus eit is a *bugfix only* minor

Am 09.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha: > Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the samba, I use > the method described it to upgrade my Samba 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2? > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba damned - how did you install it? [ ] self compiled [ ] package [ ] package on what operating system THERE IS NOTHING to do besides update the

samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3 My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. My log.samba file is full of the following; I'm not certain of the significance of these. [2012/12/17 05:59:09, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid

Dear all, after upgrading an existing NT4 domain, via "injecting" a samba3 LDAP BDC to vampire security database, classicupgrade with samba-tool ... everything seems to work like expecting, except the mentioned windows 2000 terminal server, see excerpt from log.samba file: ... [2012/11/18 13:09:26, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:475(binary_smbd_main) samba: using 'standard'

Hi, I have a test AD running Samba on Ubuntu that I sometimes poke with Sysinternal's ADExplorer. A few days ago I tried connecting to it, but got a short reply of "The directory service is not available." As it was working earlier, I tried finding the problem. After installing a few older releases, I found that it was working on Ubuntu 17.04, Samba 4.5.8 and stopped working on

Hi all, I've been running Samba 4.1.6 in production for 2 weeks now and it's been great. However I noticed a huge security flaw today that I hit only once. I access Samba4 shares over the VPN that is irrelevant since the security access is user-based, not IP based. What happens right after the connection, Windows tries to read the shares and some are empty, but they are not supposed to

Hello! I have a setup - Samba 4 for AD functionality and Zimbra 8 for e-mail and collaboration. Configured in Zimbra that for authentication Samba 4 has to be used.?Basically it works, but now randomly one time in two or three days authentication just stops working.?Nobody?is able to log in to Zimbra e-mail. Had to restart samba and everything goes as nothing ever happened! :( Last entry in

On a server Centos 7 with samba-4.2.3-11.el7_2.x86_64, joined to a server samba-3.6.23-24.el6_7.x86_64 PDC on Centos 6.7 up to date, after 7 days I want restart winbind service because the users are not autenticate anymore. This is the error into log file: > Feb  4 10:15:26 s-graph smbd[28960]: [2016/02/04 10:15:26.529467,  0] > ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) >

Hi, I want to use samba as AD on SLES 11 SP3. And I can make samba 4.5.x into some rpms which works well. Recently I try to build samba 4.8.0 using my spec file which works well on samba4.5.x. But when I test these rpms there is a problem. When I use ldap to access the domain to query some domain info, it remains me the directory service is not operational. This problem also appears in

On 3/27/2018 6:37 AM, Erdei Miklos via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I have a test AD running Samba on Ubuntu that I sometimes poke with Sysinternal's ADExplorer. > A few days ago I tried connecting to it, but got a short reply of "The directory service is not available." > As it was working earlier, I tried finding the problem. > After installing a few older releases, I

Hi, On 3/27/2018 6:37 AM, Erdei Miklos via samba wrote: &gt; Hi, &gt; &gt; I have a test AD running Samba on Ubuntu that I sometimes poke with Sysinternal's ADExplorer. &gt; A few days ago I tried connecting to it, but got a short reply of "The directory service is not available." &gt; As it was working earlier, I tried finding the problem. &gt; After

>From smb.conf: hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. Same story using the following syntax instead: hosts allow = 10.0.0.0/24 127.0.0.1/8 If I comment out the hosts allow line, the slow MS Office document access and most of the errors in the log go away. >From log.samba: [2013/07/04 00:15:52, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to

Hi, Recently I try to build a domain with samba as the domain controller. It’s the samba 4.8.0. After I’ve built and install it on my Linux, I try to test it via Ldap connection. But it remains me that the server is not operational. I used samba 4.5.16 before, and it works well. Is there any difference between samba 4.8.0 and 4.5.x about samba access or Ldap setting especially. Here’s my smb.conf: