similar to: Replication issue

Before digging into the whole stack of what composed an AD, I would try to replace this second DC (the one you called SDC). When joining a DC to a Samba AD domain,if this DC was already decalred as DC, Samba first demote that DC to then start a the whole process to join that DC to the domain. And that whole process includes re-creation of the AD database locally with full synchronisation. Not

I have two zentyal servers running samba, one as PDC and one as additional DC. It was working perfectly until last week. Now if I add a new computer to the domain it appears on one of our DCs but not on the other one. Same with users, if I deactivate one it doesn't get deactivated on the other DC. I was waiting more than a day to make sure it's not syncing . If I execute 'sudo

Thanks Garming. We currently use a standalone bind DNS server. Will the later version of samba work without the integrated DNS backend? Cheers Chris On 21/06/18 23:41, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi, > > Many of these syncing problems were solved in Samba 4.7 (and probably a > few more in 4.8). There were a number of unresolved locking issues that > we uncovered as well as some

Today I noticed something that has been going on for some weeks: I have 2 dc, (dc1 and dc2) both debian buster with the distro provided samba (4.9.5), recently upgraded from stretch. samba-tool drs showrepl on dc2 says DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=wetron,DC=es Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 via RPC DSA object GUID: 89812346-9037-43b0-86ab-c5052f55125d

On 20/09/2020 15:31, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: >> But, the error with the replication still occurs. I thought the replication >> error was linked to the ghost entry error. >> # samba-tool drs replicate DC3 DC4 dc=campus,dc=company,dc=br --full-sync >> --sync-forced >> ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DsReplicaSync failed - >>

On 20/09/2020 00:30, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > hi, > > I listed the 0ADEL entries with the command below and didn't find the > object. > # ldbsearch --cross-ncs --show-deleted -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb | > grep "\0ADEL" > > I tried to delete using the command below, but it says it doesn't exist. > # ldbdel -H

I have three S4 DCs (Sernet 4.5.2) all in happy replication, and a Windows 2008r2 DC to which the Exchange scema was added - it has failed to replication the schema/configuration ever since [yet consultants forged onwards]. It is possible to attempt to retry the replication somehow - we have since update the S4 DCs. Something like a "drs replicate --full-sync"?

Hello, We have a Windows 2008 DC (inview-dc1 and a samba 4.4.16 (inview-dc2) server as a backup DC. The system for the most-part works OK, but occasionally the Samba DC goes wildly out of sync (with respect to group membership), normally after a change to a large group. I have noted previously before the out-of-sync event occurs, this command always fails thus : root at inview-dc2:~#

Hi Samba List! We are using Samba Version 4.1.12 on two master DC. We've noticed that a corrupted group has been created, we tried to delete it, and since then, the replication fail between the two DC. The result of the command : "samba-tool drs showrepl" is the following : On the first DC, INBOUND NEIGHBORS : Last attempt @ Wed Feb 4 11:26:41 2015 CET failed, result 58

Hi The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is failing. I have enabled the log level 9. samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --full-sync -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9

Hi All, On my llvm pass I have some variable named "expr" which is being declared as :- string expr; // or char *expr; // Now I want to pass this "expr" to some external function. How can I do this?? Similarly, How can I pass variable "var" to an external function which is being decalred as :- Vector<int> var; Any help will be

hello, There is a group in my AD that has a user that does not exist. I can see it via RSAT. By running the command: samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes The following error occurs: Checking 10016 objects WARNING: no target object found for GUID component for one-way forward link member in object CN=ALUNOS,OU=GRUPOS,OU=CAMPUS,DC=mycompany,DC=net -

Hi I am running Server-1 Samba4 AD 4.6.10 with an additional Server-2 Samba4 AD 4.7.2 The Inbound replication on the Server-1 is failing with the error below: DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na Default-First-Site-Name\Server-2 via RPC DSA object GUID: 27182378-a9c7-451e-bb95-7b2172a5f311 Last attempt @ Tue Jan 9 12:55:59 2018 WAST failed, result 58

Thanks Carlos, The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have same problem after update for samba. > I allow new ports in firewall. > >

Hai, ? Im having the same problems as discribed here. https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-June/173981.html? samba4 install on debian with sernet samba. i did this about 10 times now, and this is the first time i have this. i've tried to update manualy. samba-tool drs replicate dc2 dc1 DC=INTERNAL,DC=DOMAIN,DC=TLD ? but results in : ERROR(<class

> > Basically, flag operands are a hack used to handle resources that > are not > > accurately modeled in the scheduler (e.g. condition codes, explicit > > register assignments, etc). The basic idea of the flag operand is > that > > they require the scheduler to keep the "flagged" nodes stuck > together in > > the output machine instructions. >

Hi I have tried using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is failing.Please assist to fix samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --sync-forced -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9 idmap: 9

I believe a schema change on a Windows DC (2008rc) has broken replication with our S4 DCs. Anyone have any tips or pointers to resolve this? I have three S4 DCs [CentOS6] and one Windows 2008R2 DC. The Windows 2008R2 DC has the schema master FSMO, and I believe the Exchange schema was added. I am willing to pay US dollars to get this issue resolved. I need the replication restored, the

On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 11:00 +0100, Gaetan SLONGO wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for your answer. The issue is in the source or destination ? > Because meanwhile I noticed the destination server was on 4.6.11 and not 4.7.3 as the source. What do you think about it ? Update the destination to 4.7.4 when this is released in a few days. I hope this helps, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew

Hallo, we have 5 ADDCs. All of them did run with sernet-samba 4.6.7. I updated 4 of them to sernet-samba 4.7.0, one after the other, checked replication, everything seemed to be ok. One day later a colleague wanted to delete a lot of users with a powershell-script and since then the replication doesnt work anymore. (Im sure the script is not the problem, but it seemes like it triggered something)