similar to: Functionality of Nmbd at Active Directory mode of Samba4 !

> If you run 'nmbd' with 'samba' i.e. on an AD DC, you are duplicating the code in the 'nmb' component of the 'samba' deamon, this is definitely > not recommended. You could turn off 'nmb', but again this is not recommended, the rest of the 'samba' deamon relies on 'nmb' not the > external 'nmbd' . > Or to put it another

> net:\\server > Sometimes, you have to read documentation. Oh, no. It have to do users, who use Far. :) I remembered just first camt to my head. :)) And try to explain it of nubers of users. Especially acconuters... You as Russians can know it. I know some other soft where there is no such ability (access by \\server\folder) But can not remember it at the time. > That's simply not

P. p. S.: Oh, I have remember. Quite important thing. There are some soft where is not address line where you can put \\server\folder address to access or you can not get access resource via \\server\folder, it only via computer list. For example: Far. By typing \\server - there is error. Only: Alt+F1/F2, network, MS Windows Network, GroupName, CompName. If it is visible - Samba4 with Nmbd, it is

If my messages seems somehow unreadable - I sent it from Gmail Web UI. mathias dufresne, read my 2 or 3 last messages. I wrote about mounting \\server\share as disk and risky fo viruses crypting files. Also read messages other, who does not work in AirBus. And more over, it' s your oppinion. But I see useless of more discussion at atll. If you want to combine your efforts to help with

I create multiple server instances for the samba with systemd, everything ok, but after reboot server, the service nmb does not work randomly. selinux disable samba version 4.2.10 config smb [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP3 netbios name = net3 security = user interfaces = enp7s0f3 bind interfaces only =

On 05/12/15 11:45, CpServiceSPb . wrote: >> There is nothing stopping you connecting directly to your shares, or using a domain member as a fileserver > I agree, but for most of users T talked with, via friendly name > (NetBios) but not quite long (DNS) is more comfortable. > >> In my personal opinion, you are risking trouble by still using XP, yes I know that sometimes you

2015-12-07 10:44 GMT+01:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > If my messages seems somehow unreadable - I sent it from Gmail Web UI. > > mathias dufresne, read my 2 or 3 last messages. > I wrote about mounting \\server\share as disk and risky fo viruses > crypting files. > Also read messages other, who does not work in AirBus. > > And more over, it' s

> There is nothing stopping you connecting directly to your shares, or using a domain member as a fileserver I agree, but for most of users T talked with, via friendly name (NetBios) but not quite long (DNS) is more comfortable. > In my personal opinion, you are risking trouble by still using XP, yes I know that sometimes you have to, but I would suggest that you start > making plans to

On 05 Dec 2015, at 14:43, CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com> wrote: >> Obviously to you, the lack of network browsing is a big deal, to others, >> it is just not that important. > Not to me only, also to people whom I know of and to people whom know > those people of. :)) I really don't see the need for browsing an AD DC. I prefer it does the job it's

If I enable wins support = yes & I start smbd it starts smb & nmb. When I restart the service it says that there is no nmb service at 10045 running. When I do a ps -aux, you can still see the service running. They will keep building up until I manually delete them. Does anyone know how to fix this?

Hi, Still playing around with Samba 2.0.5a running on HP-UX 10.20. Attempted to startup the smbd and nmbd daemon during system startup. smbd starts up but not the nmbd. Is there any hints. thanks in advance. best

Hi list, I am exporting share which has a small base partition into which several much larger partitions are mounted. Which are used by different user groups. My problem is, that windows takes the size of the base partition to be the size of the whole share. If I try to copy anything larger than the base partion into a partition that is actually larger Windows reports insuffient disk size

As soon as I start up the daemons using the following commands, nmbd dies. /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd -D When I view the nmbd.log it gives the following. We're trying to set up Samba to work over 2 subnets. Smbd is ok and we can still mount our shares. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks for any help. [2002/10/22 10:37:55, 0]

Newbie question. If I type nmblookup __some other machine__ I get the correct response from Samba. If I type nmblookup __mymachine__ then I get an error yhat it is not found. So if nmbd is not setup right, how do I fix it? --Dan Dan Huston Phone (602) 965-2420 Measurement, Statistics and Methodological Studies Fax (602) 965-0300 Psychology in Education

What do you want to say that Samba4 can not operate as standalone server, only intend for DC ? Or there is other way to use Samba4 simply as filserver. Btw, I was able to use Samba4 as standalone server of 434 version. 2016-03-14 22:40 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > Sorry. > But my gmail account ... > > > > 2016-03-14 22:34 GMT+03:00

Hi guys, I got a weird problem over here and couldn't find any solution in several days searching. If I switch my server on (Debian 5.0), the machine boots successfully, samba logs tell me [2009/03/05 09:13:30, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1213) smbd version 3.2.5 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 and [2009/03/05 09:13:30, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(849) nmbd

ctdb 2.5.3 dual node file server with 4.1.9 serving AD domain Hi We have enabled the script at: /etc/cdb/events.d/50.samba but when we are the enabled node, it starts not only smbd but also nmbd. This doesn't make sense in an AD domain. I've tried disabling nmbd starting under openSUSE's systemd but ctdb overrides that, I've had a look at the script but can't decipher the bit

Thanks for this answer. As I understood, for example if parameter bind interfaces only = yes is and interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254) is and if broadcast packet goes from 95.95.95.14 such packet will be dropped (in other words) ? Am I right ? And other thing. Why is 192.168.0.255 (network broadcast) opened for ? May be exact such address (network broadcast) is inbtended for receiving broadcasts

Hmmm, I founded some at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html As I saw these patches was already implemented. But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ? This is network broadcast either. And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from net security point of view. I think so. May be is it necessary to add

Hi guys, I realy need your help. It looks like SMBD doesn't want to talk with NMBD, but why? When I run the command: nmblookup torpc8 The result is: querying torpc8 on 10.5.255.255 Got a positive name query response from 10.5.2.27 ( 10.5.2.27 ) 10.5.2.27 torpc8<00> That is correct. When I run the command: smbclient -NL torpc8 The result is: resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for