similar to: No more replication for new DC

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "No more replication for new DC"

2015 Nov 16
2
No more replication for new DC
On 16/11/15 14:33, mathias dufresne wrote: > Another error coming often: > [2015/11/16 15:11:07.592598, 0] > ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:745(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) > Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for >
2015 Nov 16
2
No more replication for new DC
On 16/11/15 15:09, mathias dufresne wrote: > That did not work. I've added DNS entries mentioned in that wiki page. I > also forced creation of all entries mentioned by samba_dnsupdate > --all-names --verbose. > So I expect all needed DNS entries are present. If some are still missing > they are not mentioned by samba_dnsupdate. And as samba_dnsupdate job is to > create
2015 Nov 16
0
No more replication for new DC
Yep, I did. SPN of newly added DC were missing on all DC except for the newly added DC. I expect SPN are created on joined DC then replicated on others DCs. Adding SPN for that newly added DC in DIT of FSMO owner does not helped much. Now the error is coming repetitively in newly added DC is: [2015/11/16 16:49:42.529374, 0]
2015 Nov 16
0
No more replication for new DC
Another error coming often: [2015/11/16 15:11:07.592598, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:745(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for
2015 Nov 16
0
No more replication for new DC
That did not work. I've added DNS entries mentioned in that wiki page. I also forced creation of all entries mentioned by samba_dnsupdate --all-names --verbose. So I expect all needed DNS entries are present. If some are still missing they are not mentioned by samba_dnsupdate. And as samba_dnsupdate job is to create missing DNS entries, I dare rely on it. I expect the issue comes from missing
2015 Jul 30
2
Failed to bind to uuid ???
Dear All, Recently I notice that sometime the AD DC will die sometime. Any one have see this issue before? And yesterday case lead me to believes that this error message was the issue... They are repetitive and thus I only show 2... [2015/07/29 00:00:04.620033, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for
2015 Aug 02
1
Failed to bind to uuid ???
What Samba version are you using? I have seen a similar problem triggered by connectivity issues between the DCs. What's the output from samba-tool drs showrepl? Still, I haven't found a solution... On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Just to ask. > Anyone can shard some light on that wrong is that? > > Thank you. > > Min
2014 Sep 23
1
Replication Failure
I have 2 DCs running 4.1.12 that have stopped replicating and are producing these error messages: from dc1: Failed to commit objects: WERR_GENERAL_FAILURE/NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE [2014/09/23 10:43:35.530000, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1646(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsGetNCChanges) ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1646: DsGetNCChanges 2nd replication on
2015 Jul 21
2
Replication Problem with Deleted Object on Samba 4.1.17
Hello List, Im running an network with five samba 4 addc, all on debian wheezy with the sernet packages. Recently an replication error showed up for an single Computer (WIN7-M-ADMIN) record. So I unjoined the pc from the domain deleted it's record from dc1 manually on the other dc's it had been removed automaticaly during unjoin. Now I get the following error [2015/07/21
2014 May 06
2
Replication problems
Hai, ? Im having the same problems as discribed here. https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-June/173981.html? samba4 install on debian with sernet samba. i did this about 10 times now, and this is the first time i have this. i've tried to update manualy. samba-tool drs replicate dc2 dc1 DC=INTERNAL,DC=DOMAIN,DC=TLD ? but results in : ERROR(<class
2017 Jun 13
2
skip chunk if "DRS linked attribute for GUID - DN not found"
Hello everyone, i try to use Samba RODC(4.6.5) with W2K8R2. Windows AD has around 35000 objects. My Samba machine is small one (ARM 32bit CPU) with only 2GB physical memory, so i can’t join to the domain because of expensive memory usage. To solve this Problem, i decide to replicate only critical objects and then let samba_kcc to get other objects. 1 ) Is this an possible way to use Samba AD or
2015 Feb 04
1
Samba4 - Corrupted group caused stop of replication - "Object class violation"
Hi Samba List! We are using Samba Version 4.1.12 on two master DC. We've noticed that a corrupted group has been created, we tried to delete it, and since then, the replication fail between the two DC. The result of the command : "samba-tool drs showrepl" is the following : On the first DC, INBOUND NEIGHBORS : Last attempt @ Wed Feb 4 11:26:41 2015 CET failed, result 58
2015 Jul 02
2
Rejoin dc to domain
Hallo When rejoining a dc to the domain I get the following error message: [2015/07/02 11:51:44.089786, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:729(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for
2016 Apr 21
1
The RPC server is unavailable when clicking on RSAT tools
I'm running two Ubuntu 14.04 servers with Samba version 4.3.8-Ubuntu on each. I haven't been able to access the tools since April 15, 2016. It is setup as AD DC and all of the domain workstations CAN log in. Iv'e googled the error msgs and tried many things and have come up empty. I'm at the stage where I'm thinking of promoting dc2 and demoting dc1. I've been down a
2015 Aug 26
2
Inconsistent DCs / Failed to convert objects / WERR_GENERAL_FAILURE
Hi, I'm experiencing a strange replication problem. Context: 5 samba DC in a single domain FSMO roles are owned by 10.0.10.11 (vs-dc-siege-001) vs-dc-siege-001: 10.0.10.11 vs-dc-siege-002: 10.0.10.12 vs-dc-vty-001: 10.0.100.11 vs-dc-vty-002: 10.0.100.12 vs-oc-vty-001: 10.0.100.156 I get the following errors in : samba-tool drs showrepl CN=Configuration,DC=corp,DC=mydomain,DC=fr
2016 Apr 01
4
Samba suddenly restart and replication does not works anymore
Hello Samba team ! On my network I have three Samba-4.1.17 domain controllers (Debian Jessie) : -> One PDC : pdc01 -> Two "slave" DC : sdc02, sdc03 I don't know why, but sometimes Samba receive the SIGTERM signal and restart even if I remove it from the logrotate configuration. On "pdc01" I see : ---------- pdc01 (log.samba) ---------- SIGTERM: killing children
2023 May 11
2
Different spns for primary and secondary DCs
Hi, I have 2 domain controllers with samba4, and i realized i have some missing spns for the second domain controller: > samba-tool spn list dc1$ dc1$ User CN=dc1,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=test,DC=pt has the following servicePrincipalName: ?? ? HOST/dc1.test.pt ?? ? HOST/dc1.test.pt/test[1] ?? ? ldap/dc1.test.pt/test[1] ?? ? GC/dc1.test.pt/test.pt[2] ?? ?
2015 Dec 22
5
Dead Domain Controller server
Good afternoon, I have an environment with 4 servers samba 4 and yesterday one of them died, I tried removing it and not found, then recreated the server with the same name and joined him as a DC, however, he created a new uuid and sync entres servers I stopped, I had to force a forced sync: # samba-tool drs replicate samba02 samba01 DC=example,DC=com,DC=br # samba-tool drs replicate samba03
2015 Mar 27
4
Win 2008srv to Samba4 DNS problems
Hello, I try to migrate form an old windows AD ( win 2000 ) So I use a temporary windows2008R2 to move AD from win2000 to S4. Forest and domain level are W2008R2. Now I have some problems with the dns in samba4. I have no answers even in local from samba4. If I try to move from a new empty windows 2008 ad, The service start and answer well... So I think something in my old DNS database is
2015 Jul 06
1
Rejoin dc to domain
Dear Davor We receive an error message at the command "list domains" ntdsutil metadata cleanup connections connect to server <DC with fsmo roles> quit select operation target error: error at handling the input invalid syntax -> list domains But the command is correct! Am 02.07.2015 um 21:11 schrieb Davor Vusir: > You might need to do a meta data cleanup before