similar to: Domain join failure - error during DRS repl ADD: No objectClass found in replPropertyMetaData

On 2015.11.16, at 2:53 AM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 20:36 -0600, Matthew Delfino wrote: >> Hello Colleagues and Mentors, >> >> I'm attempting to join a Samba AD DC that I compiled with samba 4.3.1 >> on Ubuntu 14.04.3 to a group of three AD DCs, also running Samba on >> Ubuntu 14.04.3, but each of them is

If you plan to keep 4.3.x you can use --enable-fhs from configure script's options (and the two others proposed by configure --help associated to --enable-fhs). Doing that you should have most of your directories reused (/etc/samba, /var/lib/samba...) That worked for me as I don't care polluting /usr and others (I use VMs and destroy them without a tear) on Centos 7 when I switched from

On 22/11/15 19:49, Matthew Delfino wrote: > On 2015.11.19, at 9:59 AM, Matthew Delfino <mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com> wrote: > >> On 2015.11.19, at 4:26 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> If you plan to keep 4.3.x you can use --enable-fhs from configure script's options (and the two others proposed by configure --help

On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 20:36 -0600, Matthew Delfino wrote: > Hello Colleagues and Mentors, > > I'm attempting to join a Samba AD DC that I compiled with samba 4.3.1 > on Ubuntu 14.04.3 to a group of three AD DCs, also running Samba on > Ubuntu 14.04.3, but each of them is running Canonical's pre-compiled > Samba package, v4.1.6. > It appears to me that this initial

On 2015.11.19, at 9:59 AM, Matthew Delfino <mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com> wrote: > On 2015.11.19, at 4:26 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > >> If you plan to keep 4.3.x you can use --enable-fhs from configure script's options (and the two others proposed by configure --help associated to --enable-fhs). Doing that you should have most of

On 2015.11.19, at 4:26 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > If you plan to keep 4.3.x you can use --enable-fhs from configure script's options (and the two others proposed by configure --help associated to --enable-fhs). Doing that you should have most of your directories reused (/etc/samba, /var/lib/samba...) > > That worked for me as I don't care

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 07:12 -0600, Matthew Delfino wrote: > On 2015.11.16, at 2:53 AM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 20:36 -0600, Matthew Delfino wrote: > > > Hello Colleagues and Mentors, > > > > > > I'm attempting to join a Samba AD DC that I compiled with samba > > > 4.3.1 > >

On 2015.11.23, at 8:32 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > OK, try again, but this time, remove the <fSMORoleOwner> from the end of the command, this will dump the entire AD object, I am sure you will find that there is no 'fSMORoleOwner' attribute. This is your actual problem, why do you not have this FSMO role ? > > You have however found a

On 2015.11.22, at 2:27 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 22/11/15 19:49, Matthew Delfino wrote: >> On 2015.11.19, at 9:59 AM, Matthew Delfino <mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015.11.19, at 4:26 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If you plan to keep

On 2015.11.22, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Delfino <mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com> wrote: > > On 2015.11.22, at 2:27 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 22/11/15 19:49, Matthew Delfino wrote: >>> >>> I have 3 domain controllers, running Samba 4.1.6 on Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS in a VMware virtual machine (part of the package

On 23/11/15 15:51, Matthew Delfino wrote: > > On 2015.11.23, at 8:32 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>> wrote: >> OK, try again, but this time, remove the <fSMORoleOwner> from the end >> of the command, this will dump the entire AD object, I am sure you >> will find that there is no

On 2015.11.23, at 3:58 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 23/11/15 00:09, Matthew Delfino wrote: >> >> On 2015.11.22, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Delfino <mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com <mailto:mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 2015.11.22, at 2:27 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155

On 23/11/15 14:15, Matthew Delfino wrote: > > On 2015.11.23, at 3:58 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> On 23/11/15 00:09, Matthew Delfino wrote: >>> >>> On 2015.11.22, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Delfino >>> <mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com >>>

On 23/11/15 00:09, Matthew Delfino wrote: > > On 2015.11.22, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Delfino > <mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com > <mailto:mdelfino.list.samba at KNOCKinc.com>> wrote: > >> >> On 2015.11.22, at 2:27 PM, Rowland Penny >> <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>> >> wrote: >>

> On 2017.08.02, at 4:22 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:48:50 +0200 > gizmo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>> No you cannot delete something that is already deleted, but then >>> deleted objects should be ignored and I think this is fixed in later >>> versions.

An awful response: change tombstoneLifetime : ) When deleting objects they go to recycle bin then to deleted objects then are deleted. This if you have some recycle bin working which is not the case by default I reckon. tombstoneLifetime is the number of days AD has to keep deleted objects before the real deletion. If you use the recycle bin this very same tombstoneLifetime is also used to

Hello! I’m seeing the following log entries in /var/log/syslog on my FSMO (Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS / Samba 4.3.4): Feb 19 09:56:48 dc00 samba[4552]: [2016/02/19 09:56:48.527183, 0] ../source4/dns_server/dns_update.c:426(handle_one_update) Feb 19 09:56:48 dc00 samba[4552]: Can't handle updates of type 255 yet Feb 19 09:56:48 dc00 samba[4552]: [2016/02/19 09:56:48.860255, 0]

On 23/06/15 15:02, Luke Bigum wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to join a third domain controller to an existing Samba 4 domain (sernet samba 4.2.1-17.el6.x86_64) and we're hitting a problem that looks like some bad replication data on certain objects. We get part way through replicating the tree and then it dies on a Sudo Rule object: > > [root at dc03 ~]# /usr/bin/samba-tool

The system described by https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-May/199829.html (Invalid data for index DN=@INDEX:OBJECTCLASS:DNSNODE) now appears to perform DNS updates correctly, all systems are 4.2.10-Debian, and we've been able to add a user and a new DC. (Thanks for the help!) Synchronisation between v-ward (the new local DC), and empire isn't entirely working, though. >

Hello, I am trying to join a third domain controller to an existing Samba 4 domain (sernet samba 4.2.1-17.el6.x86_64) and we're hitting a problem that looks like some bad replication data on certain objects. We get part way through replicating the tree and then it dies on a Sudo Rule object: [root at dc03 ~]# /usr/bin/samba-tool domain join EXAMPLE.COM DC -U Administrator