similar to: Cannot chown file to active directory user/group on member server

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > wrote: > On 07/11/15 16:02, Krutskikh Ivan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active >> directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, >> but >> 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership

On 17/11/15 20:46, Jeff Dickens wrote: > indeed > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny > <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>> > wrote: > > On 17/11/15 20:28, Jeff Dickens wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny > <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com >

On 07/11/15 16:02, Krutskikh Ivan wrote: > Hi, > > I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active > directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, but > 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership is unchanged. What am I doing wrong? > > archive-test:/archive/video # ls -lia ./test.mp4 > 17121 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root

So I am still stuck. For reference here is the smb.conf on the member server: root at florence:~# more /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] netbios name = FLORENCE security = ADS workgroup = IOL realm = IOL.SEAMANPAPER.COM log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 1 dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab

Hi everyone, I think, I've done something stupid here. At first I've created 2 lxc containers and provisioned one as dc.office.mtt and joined second one to the first ad bdc.tsnr.mtt. Then I've cloned those containers several times and changed ip adresses and dns names of new containers to different subnets. The name of domain stayed the same. At first everything seemed fine, but when

Hello, Occasionally when I perform "net rpc group members (group a)," I get a timeout. When I do "net rpc group members (group b)," I always get a timeout. I get the following error: [2007/01/05 16:36:18, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(790) rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine 127.0.0.1 pipe \samr fnum 0x72cdreturned critical error. Error was Call timed out: server did not

Hi, I have a very strange issue with samba as an ad member server. log.smbd goes: check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [TSNR]\[Administrator]@[ADMIN] with the new password interface [2015/11/27 19:09:26.196960, 3] ../source3/auth/auth.c:180(auth_check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [TSNR]\[Administrator]@[ADMIN] [2015/11/27 19:09:26.196993, 4]

ok =( Guess I should repeat all the work from scratch. So just to check if I got it right: 1) Create a new container. Provision a ad dc on it. Can I join some machine to apply some gpo's and to create users at this point? I'll delete it afterwards 2) Power down the container from 1) and use it as a template for every other dc I need just by changing ip/dns 3) Create another template for

Hi everyone. I ran into notorios gpo error on windows clients. When I go to my dc controller and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck I get an error: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tsnr.mtt/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

Hi everyone, A quick question: Is check password script option working for ad dc setup? I believe, ad on it's own cannot provide password protection against dictionaries.

Let me explain myself here. We ship video surveillance systems with build-in ad domain controllers on 2 servers. Right now we have 4 active projects and 3 more this year. Provisioning dc's by hand each time is a pain I would like to avoid. There's not much I want from a domain: groups 'video' and 'video admins' to exist, gpo's to auto redirect user profiles to network

I would like to bump my question 2015-05-27 10:21 GMT+03:00 Krutskikh Ivan <stein.hak at gmail.com>: > Hmm, looks like it's not. I've just set the password for something that > cracklib-check would argue using both ad management tools and at windows > login. Should it work that way or I'm missing something? > > My dc's smb.conf: > > [global] >

Hello to the list Some days ago, I placed a question on this maling-list and received an answer from Martin that I tried to follow. Unfortunately, I am still puzzled by the next step. I spent the whole Week-end in gathering information from the net. Some of them are almost contridtcory and I lack a good document to help me. So my first question would beL Is there a convenient document which

Looking at some of the stuff in /etc/logrotate.d, I see entries like this in some of the configuration files: postrotate /sbin/service privoxy reload 2> /dev/null || true >From the commandline, that doesn't work: # /sbin/service privoxy reload 2> /dev/null || true Usage: /etc/init.d/privoxy {start|stop|restart} Changing reload to restart does work: ]# /sbin/service privoxy

I use the KB SSL Enforcer https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/flcpelgcagfhfoegekianiofphddckof?hl=en so i could browse the net safer [i mean webserver <-> me] with using https, if available. The problem is: e.g.: facebook... if i go to https://www.facebook.com/ that's ok, it's https. But all the links are "http" on the site.. if i click on a "http"

With invaluable help here, I've just gotten 6.0 onto a PC. I went through the listings in PackageKit, removing things I know I'll never use; ran yum update; installed Opera; went to the epel, rpmfusion, and one whose name slips my mind (It's a new name.); enabled them all; and tried to get a lot of my regular apps : [....] Setting up Install Process No package dillo

For errors with: download.file() install.package() update.package() any other command that R uses to access the internet Setting up a proxy in R 2.2.1 for windows. I work at a Central Bank so our firewall and proxy are very particular. To allow R to access the net I did the following: 1. In order for other programs, specifically STATA, to access the internet we use a program called Privoxy.

>> But instead i get >> centos: sshd[7929]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user >> <username> > > "pam_unix" should be an indication that <username> appears in the local > unix password files. Make sure that it doesn't. Nope. None of the usernames i tried is in /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow > > What do /etc/pam.d/sshd and

Hi. I''m a happy shorewall user. I found something that looks like a possible bug. I''m using shorewall on a single computer at home. I''m using the privoxy proxy server and dansguardian content filter. I configured shorewall based on the "one interface" example from the shorewall.net website. I set the firewall up so that users cannot directly connect to

On 19/10/15 14:07, Krutskikh Ivan wrote: > ok =( Guess I should repeat all the work from scratch. So just to check if > I got it right: > > 1) Create a new container. Provision a ad dc on it. Can I join some machine > to apply some gpo's and to create users at this point? I'll delete it > afterwards Well NO , there is no point. > > 2) Power down the container from