similar to: Join Samba without GC role

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Join Samba without GC role"

2015 Oct 30
3
Join Samba without GC role
Hi Andrew! I notice, when we have a lot of domain Samba replicate object from all domain - it's too long for us (GC about 16gb). I going to use --domain-critical-only, and after join disable GC on Samba. -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 6:31 AM To: Luchko Dmitriy; samba at
2015 Nov 02
2
Join Samba without GC role
Thanks for the answer! Is that true if we have Subdomains, Samba write to DB information only about join-domain? And what option --domain-critical-only do? I did not see the difference - with or without. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org] Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 12:14 PM To: Luchko Dmitriy <Luchko.D at digdes.com>; samba at
2015 Nov 17
2
Samba limitations at scale (was: Re: Join Samba without GC role)
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 12:44 +0000, Luchko Dmitriy wrote: > Andrew, thank for answer! > > We understand about limitation subdomains on Samba but we suggested > that is one cause of current problem. We can all agree that this is a current limitation. > May be you know why python process can hung with 100% CPU ? Does > samba have limitation of groups or OU hierarchy? > p.s.
2015 Nov 06
2
Join Samba without GC role
It's strange. We have root domain and a lot subdomain. We try to join Samba to one of subdomain. Active Directory DB (NTDS.dit) without GC = 1.2 Gb, with GC=16 Gb. When we try to join Samba we have samba DB limit 4Gb. We see that samba replicate information about all domains in forest: descriptor_sd_propagation_recursive: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=domain1,DC=oao,DC=company not found under
2015 Nov 17
2
Join Samba without GC role
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 08:27 +0000, Luchko Dmitriy wrote: > I created test environment: 1 root domain, 2 subdomain. I created > about 250000 user accounts in subdomain 2 (sub2.company.com) ntds.dit > 14gb. Joining samba in first subdomain (sub1) was without problem. > But in production environment (with a lot of domains and objects) > python process was hung with 100% CPU (after 6
2015 Nov 18
0
Samba limitations at scale (was: Re: Join Samba without GC role)
Andrew, thank for full answer! -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:34 PM To: Luchko Dmitriy <Luchko.D at digdes.com>; samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Samba limitations at scale (was: Re: [Samba] Join Samba without GC role) On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 12:44 +0000, Luchko Dmitriy wrote: > Andrew, thank for answer!
2015 Nov 17
0
Join Samba without GC role
I created test environment: 1 root domain, 2 subdomain. I created about 250000 user accounts in subdomain 2 (sub2.company.com) ntds.dit 14gb. Joining samba in first subdomain (sub1) was without problem. But in production environment (with a lot of domains and objects) python process was hung with 100% CPU (after 6 hour we killed hung process). Why can this happened? This is samba subdomain
2015 Nov 17
0
Join Samba without GC role
Andrew, thank for answer! We understand about limitation subdomains on Samba but we suggested that is one cause of current problem. May be you know why python process can hung with 100% CPU ? Does samba have limitation of groups or OU hierarchy? p.s. May be our questions too strange but we don’t have full documentation, about samba limitations and samba architecture. -----Original
2015 Dec 03
2
Disable KCC in Samba
Hi, colleges, We have a big environment with windows domains controllers. We know that KCC in samba doesn't work well now. How we can disable KCC in Samba and create site-link manually? Best regards,   DMITRIY LUCHKO
2015 Dec 03
1
Disable KCC in Samba
I read about 4.3.0 and we test this version in polygon. In production we have more than 80 sites and about 200 domain controllers. In test environment we have a lot warning KCC (samba 4.3.), and we suggest in production we have the same picture. Will you make change in KCC for nearest Samba release? Best regards, DMITRIY LUCHKO -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces
2015 Oct 02
3
Samba 4.3 Logon Error (Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service)
Stand contains two DC with Windows 2003 Std SP2 En: - root domain company.local - child domain (1) gonzo.company.local -- site 1: Windows 2003 (FSMO) -- site 2: Samba AD DC - child domain (2) depth.company.local I have CentOS 7 and Samba 4.3 in child domain (1) in dedicated active directory site (site 2 ). When I try logon from client (windows 7 workstation) I have error "Insufficient
2015 Dec 03
2
DRS_The specified I/O operation on %hs was not completed before the time-out period expired.'
Hi, When we try replicate domain tree from Win DC to Samba DC we have timeout error: ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DsReplicaSync failed - drsException: DsReplicaSync failed (-1073741643, '{Device Timeout} The specified I/O operation on %hs was not completed before the time-out period expired.') File
2015 Nov 13
2
Samba 4.3 restrictions
Hi, I have nowhere seen information about restrictions of Samba: How many objects Samba can store in sambadb? What maximum size tdb database? How many domain controllers can be in one samba domain? How many sites can be store in one Samba domain? Best regards, DMITRIY LUCHKO
2015 Oct 02
2
Samba 4.3 Logon Error (Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service)
I really forgot about .local but I don't think that the problem is related with this. -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 3:25 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.3 Logon Error (Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service) On 02/10/15
2015 Nov 13
0
Samba 4.3 restrictions
Hi Dmitriy, I can only answer one of your question: tdb size limit is 4GB because there some piece of code about tdb which is still in 32 bits, limiting the file size. Regarding number of objects I push a bit more than 270000 objects in one AD in addition of initial objects. 120000+ users, 150000+ computers, no groups. TDB size was between 3.0GB and 3.5GB. For others questions, I let others
2015 Oct 02
0
Samba 4.3 Logon Error (Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service)
On 02/10/15 13:47, Luchko Dmitriy wrote: > I really forgot about .local but I don't think that the problem is related with this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny > Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 3:25 PM > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.3 Logon Error (Insufficient
2017 Aug 11
3
Help to create bugzilla account
Hi mailing list and R-core. Could someone from R-core please help me to create account in bugzilla? I would like to submit issue related to gc() to wishlist. Related context is here - https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-July/074715.html -- Regards Dmitriy Selivanov [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2017 Aug 11
2
Help to create bugzilla account
2017-08-11 16:00 GMT+02:00 Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>: >>>>>> Dmitriy Selivanov <selivanov.dmitriy at gmail.com> >>>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:33:31 +0400 writes: > > > Hi mailing list and R-core. Could someone from R-core please help me to > > create account in bugzilla? I would like to submit issue
2017 Aug 12
3
Help to create bugzilla account
Strange because in my all my experiments calling malloc.trim always helped - memory reported by top decreased to the level it supposed to be. Do you have in mind case when calling malloc.trim won't do anything? Also shouldn't MALLOC_TRIM_THRESHOLD_ env variable has impact on malloc.trim calls? At the moment seems any value is ignored... 12 ???. 2017 ?. 6:09 ?? ???????????? "Simon
2013 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] Assertion failed after my storeRegToStackSlot/loadFromStackSlot
Hi Dmitriy, As you've seen our current spill code assumes that spill/reloads are single instructions. I think the best way to work around this is to introduce load/store pseudo-instructions and expand these after register allocation. Cheers, Lang. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Dmitriy Limonov <earl at excluzive.ws> wrote: > Hi All. > > I'm writing