Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Change default samba 4.1. ACL behaviour"
2015 Nov 16
3
Samba 4.1. creates group rights for not existing group.
I use samba 4.1 as dc with acl. I have user with uid 3000023. However, I don't have group with guid 3000023. However, when this user creates a folder samba in acl list creates permissions for group 3000023 and as result I have broken link. How to fix it?
-- 
Alex Sviridov
2015 Nov 16
2
Samba 4.1. creates group rights for not existing group.
On 2015-11-16 at 11:14 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 16/11/15 10:11, Alex Sviridov wrote:
> >  I use samba 4.1 as dc with acl. I have user with uid 3000023. However, I don't have group with guid 3000023. However, when this user creates a folder samba in acl list creates permissions for group 3000023 and as result I have broken link. How to fix it?
> >
> >
> 
> Hi,
2016 Oct 26
3
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a
freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a
standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the
client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server
unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC
itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are
2015 Nov 16
2
Samba 4.1. creates group rights for not existing group.
On 2015-11-16 at 12:57 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 16/11/15 12:53, Michael Adam wrote:
> >On 2015-11-16 at 11:14 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote:
> >>On 16/11/15 10:11, Alex Sviridov wrote:
> >>>  I use samba 4.1 as dc with acl. I have user with uid 3000023. However, I don't have group with guid 3000023. However, when this user creates a folder samba in acl list
2016 Oct 27
4
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400
Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve,
> except for 300000. Below is an example.
> 
> root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/
> total 16
> drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies
> drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp
2019 Feb 25
2
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
On 25.02.2019 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:24:24 +0100
> Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>> I'm confused.. how is the choice of the idmap backend related to an
>>>> AD DC use case?
>>> Only in the case of wanting the same ID everywhere.
>> In my understanding, the
2017 Jun 16
2
Erro sysvolcheck/sysvolreset
:-|
ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol
drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol
Em 16-06-2017 13:38, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:15:19 -0300
> "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, sorry, uncomment a line :-D
>>
>> Yes  exist!
>>
>> ls -ld
2018 Jun 14
4
Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400
Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have either
> libnss-winbind or libpam-winbind files on my AD/DC.
I keep forgetting that you use slackware, I suppose it uses something
different, but do you have any file like: libnss_winbind.so.2
> 
> Circling back
2019 Sep 18
2
Sync UID/GUI between two DCs
Am 18.09.19 um 16:17 schrieb Rowland penny:
> On 18/09/2019 03:41, Simeon Peter via samba wrote:
>> I would remove any uidNumber & gidNumber attributes from the 
>> following users (if set):
>>> administrator
>>> guest
>>> krbtgt
>> Administrator has a uidNumber since long time and owns some files. 
>> Are there disadvantages if I leave his
2019 Jun 03
3
How to fix mapping Administrator to root
Thanks, Rowland , 'net cache flush' solved my problem. but I found that I can't access any share in \\myshare.
some related configurations  in my smb,conf
....
access based share enum = yes
hide unreadable = yes
username map = /etc/samba/user.map
I can't see  any share folder of my fileserver in fsmgmt.msc. and I run "smbstatus -b"
PID     Username     Group       
2017 Jan 11
4
Corrupted idmap...
Rowland, no domain user can authenticate on any system and running
sysvolreset followed by sysvolcheck results in a crash. If the sysvol
permissions are correct, sysvolcheck does not crash. If I attempt to
join a NAS or workstation to the domain I get NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID.
Researching these symptoms turns up a thread about a corrupt idmap.ldb
where a group SID and user SID may be the same or
2016 Feb 02
2
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
Hi again,
Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 12:09:59 CET schrieb Rowland penny:
> On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny:
> >> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote:
[....]
> Ok, there are two schools of thought here, you can give Administrator a
> uidNumber attribute, but this, as far as Unix is
2018 Jun 15
1
Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:10:03 -0400
Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400
> > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have
> > >
2015 Nov 16
0
Samba 4.1. creates group rights for not existing group.
On 16/11/15 12:53, Michael Adam wrote:
> On 2015-11-16 at 11:14 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 16/11/15 10:11, Alex Sviridov wrote:
>>>   I use samba 4.1 as dc with acl. I have user with uid 3000023. However, I don't have group with guid 3000023. However, when this user creates a folder samba in acl list creates permissions for group 3000023 and as result I have broken
2015 Nov 16
0
Samba 4.1. creates group rights for not existing group.
On 16/11/15 13:28, Michael Adam wrote:
> On 2015-11-16 at 12:57 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 16/11/15 12:53, Michael Adam wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-16 at 11:14 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>> On 16/11/15 10:11, Alex Sviridov wrote:
>>>>>   I use samba 4.1 as dc with acl. I have user with uid 3000023. However, I don't have group with guid 3000023.
2014 Jan 22
1
Samba4 as DC and Neighborhood browsing (nmbd functionality) !
At the moment if Samba4 acts as DC (domain controller) it doesn' t
support neighborhood browsing, that is computers in a local group are not
visible in network neighborhood.
I have not been remaining think about working of the functionality.
And have found this one:
http://forge.univention.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30132
I am not a programmer but may be it will be useful for easier and
2017 Jan 13
3
Fwd: Re: Duplicate xidNumbers
Rowland,
Thank you for the quick response.
I have just run net cache flush no change in problem.  I have dumped the
idmap.ldp using ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb >
idmap.txt and did some sorting, that is how I found the duplicates.
On 1/13/2017 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> samba-tool ntacl
> >sysvolreset
2017 Jan 12
2
Corrupted idmap...
I forgot about ldbsearch. Here is a dump of xid numbers.
root at dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xidNumber
xidNumber: 3000028
xidNumber: 3000013
xidNumber: 3000033
xidNumber: 3000003
xidNumber: 3000032
xidNumber: 3000023
xidNumber: 3000019
xidNumber: 3000010
xidNumber: 65534
xidNumber: 3000031
xidNumber: 3000022
xidNumber: 3000026
xidNumber: 3000017
xidNumber: 3000027
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 2:38 PM Rowland penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> So '5035' is a computer, but what is '3000011' ?
> You can find out by running this on the DC:
> ldbsearch -H /path/to/idmap.ldb '(&(objectClass=sidMap)(xidNumber=3000011))'
===================================
# ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb
2017 Sep 05
3
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Thank you very much for clarifying the ID mapping "magic";)
 
> You do not need 'posixgroup', it is an auxiliary objectclass of
group, you can add any of the rfc2307 attributes without it.
Well, is there any option to remove it? Because "posixgroup" is on
every group that was migrated from Samba 3.
And I cannot edit this attribute in ADUC (delete button is grayed).